Paper · 2005 · Agritrop (Cirad)

Genetic effects of inter-tree competition in mixed cocoa stands on yield, vigour and cropping efficiency

Philippe Lachenaud

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A method developed to assess family competition effects (partner effects) in variety trials was applied to the cocoa tree. The study was conducted in a hybrid trial, involving twelve families of 50 trees each planted in a totally randomised single-tree plot design, at a density of 1,667 trees ha-1. The trial was thinned 10 years after planting, at a rate of two out of four rows. Competition was studied with reference to juvenile and adult vegetative vigour, to periodic and cumulative yields (number of pods, potential total pod weight and average weight of one pod), and the yield x vigour ratio or "cropping efficiency" (total pod weight divided by the trunk cross-section). At the end of the trial, after thirteen years of monitoring, competition effects were revealed which explained 8 to 10% of the residual variance after removal of the hybrid and micro-environmental effects. The competition effects, which were detectable by 18 months after planting for vigour, occurred earlier than generally acknowledged. Competition effects for yield increased with age of the plantation and decreased drastically after thinning at 10 years. Under the trial conditions, the families could be classified as "aggressive", "stimulating" or "passive" in relation to their neighbours. Vegetative vigour (trunk cross-sectional area) explained up to 34% of the competition effects affecting vegetative development- total pod production and total pod weight over the period concerned. The partner effects on the production variables could never be explained by any of the production variables themselves, hence it should be possible to select non-aggressive high-yielding families. No significant partner effect was observed for average pod weight. The improvement of the cropping efficiency, and more generally management of vegetative vigour, can follow genetic and plant husbandry pathways and these are considered in the Discussion. The genetic pathway entails the selection of hybrid or clonal material with low vigour and/or the search for dwarfing rootstocks. The plant husbandry pathway involves developing designs and techniques (such as thinning, pruning, etc...), which might decrease the competition effects between trees in a given plot situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition (partner) effects explained 8 to 10% of the residual variance in cocoa after removal of hybrid and micro-environmental effects.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment
competition effectse1
Outcome
residual variancee1
Value
8 to 10%e1
Qualifier
after removal of the hybrid and micro-environmental effectse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“competition effects were revealed which explained 8 to 10% of the residual variance after removal of the hybrid and micro-environmental effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–885 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition effects on cocoa vigour were detectable by 18 months after planting, earlier than generally acknowledged.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
vigoure2
Value
18 months after plantinge2
Qualifier
occurred earlier than generally acknowledgede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“The competition effects, which were detectable by 18 months after planting for vigour, occurred earlier than generally acknowledged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1018 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition effects for cocoa yield increased with the age of the plantation.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment
age of the plantatione3
Outcome
Competition effects for yielde3
Direction
increasede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“Competition effects for yield increased with age of the plantation and decreased drastically after thinning at 10 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1139 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Competition effects for cocoa yield decreased drastically after thinning at 10 years.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment
thinning at 10 yearse3
Outcome
Competition effects for yielde3
Direction
decreased drasticallye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“Competition effects for yield increased with age of the plantation and decreased drastically after thinning at 10 years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1139 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under the trial conditions the cocoa families could be classified as aggressive, stimulating or passive relative to their neighbours.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
families could be classifiede4
Qualifier
in relation to their neighbourse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the families could be classified as "aggressive", "stimulating" or "passive" in relation to their neighbours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1277 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative vigour (trunk cross-sectional area) explained up to 34% of the competition effects affecting vegetative development, total pod production and total pod weight, in cocoa.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Treatment
Vegetative vigour (trunk cross-sectional area)e5
Outcome
competition effects affecting vegetative developmente5
Value
up to 34%e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“Vegetative vigour (trunk cross-sectional area) explained up to 34% of the competition effects affecting vegetative development- total pod production and total pod weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1448 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partner effects on the production variables of cocoa could not be explained by the production variables themselves.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
partner effects on the production variablese6
Comparator
any of the production variables themselvese6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“The partner effects on the production variables could never be explained by any of the production variables themselves, hence it should be possible to select non-aggressive high-yielding families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant partner effect was observed for cocoa average pod weight.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
average pod weighte7
Qualifier
No significant partner effecte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e7

“No significant partner effect was observed for average pod weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1738 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

It should be possible to select non-aggressive high-yielding cocoa families.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
select non-aggressive high-yielding familiese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“The partner effects on the production variables could never be explained by any of the production variables themselves, hence it should be possible to select non-aggressive high-yielding families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1671 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Improvement of cropping efficiency in cocoa can follow genetic and plant husbandry pathways, including management of vegetative vigour.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
improvement of the cropping efficiencye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“The improvement of the cropping efficiency, and more generally management of vegetative vigour, can follow genetic and plant husbandry pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1883 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The genetic pathway for cocoa is selection of hybrid or clonal material with low vigour.

Taxon
cocoa treeTheobroma cacaoe0
Outcome
selection of hybrid or clonal material with low vigoure2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied to the cocoa tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“The genetic pathway entails the selection of hybrid or clonal material with low vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2014 · show in text ↑