Abstract
Growth attributes of Vigna mungo and Vigna radiata crop influenced by level and type of fertilizers. The present study was carried out to evaluate and compare the effects of organic (vermicompost) and inorganic (urea) fertilizers on the germination percentage and seedling growth of V. radiata (Green gram) and V. mungo (Black gram). Fresh weight and dry weight of tested plant samples at 10th days of growth stage were also determined. Vermicompost was used as organic fertilizer and urea as inorganic fertilizer. Experimental results showed that vermicompost and urea both has positive effect on seedling growth parameters of V. mungo and V. radiata [average root length (6.1cm and 6.7cm)] , shoot length (6.5cm and 8.3cm), leaf area (312.2 sq.cm and 334.1 sq.cm] as compared to control set [average root length (4.4cm and 4.3cm)] , shoot length (6cm and 5.9cm), leaf area (282.7 sq.cm and 305.5 sq.cm). But urea exerts negative effect on seed germination percentage in V. mungo and V. radiata (58% and 50%) as compared to control (77%). Vermicompost exhibited better result in above parameters in comparison to urea. V. mungo showed increased value in comparison considering V. radiata in case of organic, inorganic fertilizer treated as well as control sets. As composition of locally available fertilizers is unknown, the application of these fertilizers for improving germination percentage and growth parameters of tested crop need to be evaluated. Present work may provide the suggestive approach for usage of these tested fertilizers in field level trial.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost and urea both increased average root length of V. mungo and V. radiata compared with the control.
- Taxon
- V. mungo and V. radiata
Vigna mungo.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae1 - Treatment
- vermicompost and ureae1
- Outcome
- average root lengthe1
- Direction
- positive effecte1
- Value
- 6.1cm and 6.7cme1
- Qualifier
- 4.4cm and 4.3cme1
- Comparator
- control sete1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“vermicompost and urea both has positive effect on seedling growth parameters of V. mungo and V. radiata [average root length (6.1cm and 6.7cm)] , shoot length (6.5cm and 8.3cm), leaf area (312.2 sq.cm and 334.1 sq.cm] as compared to control set [average root length (4.4cm and 4.3cm)] , shoot length (6cm and 5.9cm), leaf area (282.7 sq.cm and 305.5 sq.cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost and urea both increased shoot length of V. mungo and V. radiata compared with the control.
- Taxon
- V. mungo and V. radiataVigna mungoVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- vermicompost and ureae1
- Outcome
- shoot lengthe1
- Direction
- positive effecte1
- Value
- 6.5cm and 8.3cme1
- Qualifier
- 6cm and 5.9cme1
- Comparator
- control sete1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“vermicompost and urea both has positive effect on seedling growth parameters of V. mungo and V. radiata [average root length (6.1cm and 6.7cm)] , shoot length (6.5cm and 8.3cm), leaf area (312.2 sq.cm and 334.1 sq.cm] as compared to control set [average root length (4.4cm and 4.3cm)] , shoot length (6cm and 5.9cm), leaf area (282.7 sq.cm and 305.5 sq.cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost and urea both increased leaf area of V. mungo and V. radiata compared with the control.
- Taxon
- V. mungo and V. radiataVigna mungoVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- vermicompost and ureae1
- Outcome
- leaf areae1
- Direction
- positive effecte1
- Value
- 312.2 sq.cm and 334.1 sq.cme1
- Qualifier
- 282.7 sq.cm and 305.5 sq.cme1
- Comparator
- control sete1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“vermicompost and urea both has positive effect on seedling growth parameters of V. mungo and V. radiata [average root length (6.1cm and 6.7cm)] , shoot length (6.5cm and 8.3cm), leaf area (312.2 sq.cm and 334.1 sq.cm] as compared to control set [average root length (4.4cm and 4.3cm)] , shoot length (6cm and 5.9cm), leaf area (282.7 sq.cm and 305.5 sq.cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Urea reduced seed germination percentage of V. mungo and V. radiata compared with the control.
- Taxon
- V. mungo and V. radiataVigna mungoVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- ureae1
- Outcome
- seed germination percentagee1
- Direction
- negative effecte1
- Value
- 58% and 50%e1
- Qualifier
- 77%e1
- Comparator
- controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“But urea exerts negative effect on seed germination percentage in V. mungo and V. radiata (58% and 50%) as compared to control (77%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Vermicompost gave better seedling growth results than urea.
- Taxon
- V. mungo and V. radiataVigna mungoVigna radiatae2
- Treatment
- Vermicomposte1
- Outcome
- result in above parameterse1
- Direction
- bettere1
- Comparator
- ureae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Vermicompost exhibited better result in above parameters in comparison to urea”
e2“vermicompost and urea both has positive effect on seedling growth parameters of V. mungo and V. radiata [average root length (6.1cm and 6.7cm)] , shoot length (6.5cm and 8.3cm), leaf area (312.2 sq.cm and 334.1 sq.cm] as compared to control set [average root length (4.4cm and 4.3cm)] , shoot length (6cm and 5.9cm), leaf area (282.7 sq.cm and 305.5 sq.cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
V. mungo showed higher seedling growth values than V. radiata across fertiliser and control sets.
- Taxon
- V. mungoVigna mungoe1
- Outcome
- increased valuee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- V. radiatae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“V. mungo showed increased value in comparison considering V. radiata in case of organic, inorganic fertilizer treated as well as control sets”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →nitrogen · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.