Paper · 2019 · Journal of Bacteriology & Mycology Open Access

The effects of plant extracts of lemon-scented tea tree [Leptospermum petersonii (Myrtaceae)] on Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae)

Pervin Erdogan

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The two-spotted spider mite [Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae)] is a very serious pest worldwide, causing considerable damage to vegetables, flowers and fruit crops. Control is difficult mainly due to mite resistance to conventional acaricides. The application of plant extracts to control insects can be an effective alternative. In this study, the efficacy of extract obtained from Leptospermum petersonii Bailey (Myrtaceae) was tested as an alternative to conventional acaricides. Using two different methods, bioassays were used to determine the effects of varying concentrations (0.1, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5%) of the extracts. Experiments were carried out using 3cm diameter leaf disks of Phaseolus vulgaris L. In addition, the effects of the extracts on mite reproduction and oviposition were investigated. In the leaf dipping method, the extract at 0.5% concentration caused the highest mortality in the nymph (100%) and adult (100%) stages. In the lowest concentration bioassays, the adult mites laid lower numbers of eggs compared to the untreated control. The highest effect occurred at a concentration of 0.5% while the lowest effect was at 0.1%. No ovicidal effects of the plant extracts were observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5% extract caused the highest mortality of nymphal mites (100%) in leaf dipping.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Organ / stage
nymphe3
Treatment
the extract at 0.5% concentratione3
Interactor
Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
mortalitye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
100%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Experiments were carried out using 3cm diameter leaf disks of Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–725 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the leaf dipping method, the extract at 0.5% concentration caused the highest mortality in the nymph (100%) and adult (100%) stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5% extract caused the highest mortality of adult mites (100%) in leaf dipping.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Organ / stage
adulte3
Treatment
the extract at 0.5% concentratione3
Interactor
Tetranychus urticae KochTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
mortalitye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
100%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina: Tetranychidae)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“Experiments were carried out using 3cm diameter leaf disks of Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–725 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the leaf dipping method, the extract at 0.5% concentration caused the highest mortality in the nymph (100%) and adult (100%) stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the lowest concentration, adult mites laid fewer eggs than on the untreated control.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Organ / stage
adulte4
Treatment
lowest concentratione4
Interactor
adult mitese4pest
Outcome
numbers of eggse4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
untreated controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Experiments were carried out using 3cm diameter leaf disks of Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–725 · show in text ↑
e4

“In the lowest concentration bioassays, the adult mites laid lower numbers of eggs compared to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1074 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.5% concentration had the highest effect and the 0.1% concentration the lowest effect.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
a concentration of 0.5%e5
Outcome
effecte5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
0.1%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Experiments were carried out using 3cm diameter leaf disks of Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–725 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest effect occurred at a concentration of 0.5% while the lowest effect was at 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1166 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plant extracts had no ovicidal effect.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise2
Treatment
plant extractse6
Outcome
ovicidal effectse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Experiments were carried out using 3cm diameter leaf disks of Phaseolus vulgaris L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–725 · show in text ↑
e6

“No ovicidal effects of the plant extracts were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1223 · show in text ↑

botanical · Tetranychus urticae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.