Paper · 2019 · Agricultural Science Digest - A Research Journal

Sterilization procedure and callus regeneration in black turmeric (Curcuma caesia)

A. S. Abubakar; R. N. Pudake

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sterilization procedure, media composition, explants selection and control of physical environment are critical for successful cultures and callus induction with surface sterilization being very challenging in most plants. Five different sterilization methods were evaluated to come up with the best for subsequent use to establish an in vitro regeneration method for the induction of callus in Curcuma caesia using excised leaf and rhizome explants. Murashige and Skoog (MS) media supplemented with various concentration of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4-D)/Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (0.5- 5.0mg/L), singly or in combination with Benzyl aminopurine (BAP)/Kinetin (KIN) (0.1-5.0mg/L), 0.3% sucrose and 0.08% agar were used. The result of the sterilization procedures showed 15% NaHClO3 (5min) + 70% Ethanol (30s) + 0.1% HgCl2 (5min) to be the most effective in controlling contamination in C. caesia among all the treatments tested. The response to callus induction was found to depend on the type of explants used and growth regulators combination. Leaf explants gave the highest percentage of callus induction. Highest percentage of callus induction (66.70%) was obtained in the growth regulator combination of 2, 4-D (0.5mg/L) + BAP (0.1mg/L) and least (14.29%) in IAA (2.0mg/L) + BAP (0.5mg/L). Equal and higher concentration of 2, 4-D + BAP of 5.0mg/L each also provided better result (40.00%). No callus was obtained in all the single concentration of 2, 4-D used.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15% NaHClO3 + 70% ethanol + 0.1% HgCl2 sterilization sequence was the most effective in controlling contamination in Curcuma caesia

Taxon
Curcuma caesiaCurcuma caesiat0
Treatment
15% NaHClO3 (5min) + 70% Ethanol (30s) + 0.1% HgCl2 (5min)e1
Outcome
controlling contaminatione1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
all the treatments testede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma caesia
Curcuma caesia · TaxonRamesh Raju · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Curcuma caesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“15% NaHClO3 (5min) + 70% Ethanol (30s) + 0.1% HgCl2 (5min) to be the most effective in controlling contamination in C. caesia among all the treatments tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf explants gave the highest percentage of callus induction in Curcuma caesia

Taxon
Curcuma caesiaCurcuma caesiat0
Organ / stage
Leafe2
Treatment
Leaf explantse2
Outcome
percentage of callus inductione2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma caesia
Curcuma caesia · TaxonRamesh Raju · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Curcuma caesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf explants gave the highest percentage of callus induction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction was highest (66.70%) with 2,4-D 0.5 mg/L plus BAP 0.1 mg/L in Curcuma caesia

Taxon
Curcuma caesiaCurcuma caesiat0
Treatment
2, 4-D (0.5mg/L) + BAP (0.1mg/L)e3
Outcome
percentage of callus inductione3
Direction
Higheste3
Value
66.70%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma caesia
Curcuma caesia · TaxonRamesh Raju · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Curcuma caesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest percentage of callus induction (66.70%) was obtained in the growth regulator combination of 2, 4-D (0.5mg/L) + BAP (0.1mg/L) and least (14.29%) in IAA (2.0mg/L) + BAP (0.5mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Callus induction was lowest (14.29%) with IAA 2.0 mg/L plus BAP 0.5 mg/L in Curcuma caesia

Taxon
Curcuma caesiaCurcuma caesiat0
Treatment
IAA (2.0mg/L) + BAP (0.5mg/L)e3
Outcome
percentage of callus inductione3
Direction
leaste3
Value
14.29%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma caesia
Curcuma caesia · TaxonRamesh Raju · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Curcuma caesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
e3

“Highest percentage of callus induction (66.70%) was obtained in the growth regulator combination of 2, 4-D (0.5mg/L) + BAP (0.1mg/L) and least (14.29%) in IAA (2.0mg/L) + BAP (0.5mg/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Equal and higher 2,4-D plus BAP at 5.0 mg/L each gave a better callus result (40.00%)

Taxon
Curcuma caesiaCurcuma caesiat0
Treatment
2, 4-D + BAP of 5.0mg/L eache4
Outcome
resulte4
Direction
bettere4
Value
40.00%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma caesia
Curcuma caesia · TaxonRamesh Raju · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Curcuma caesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
e4

“Equal and higher concentration of 2, 4-D + BAP of 5.0mg/L each also provided better result (40.00%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No callus was obtained with any single concentration of 2,4-D in Curcuma caesia

Taxon
Curcuma caesiaCurcuma caesiat0
Treatment
single concentration of 2, 4-De5
Outcome
No callus was obtainede5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Curcuma caesia
Curcuma caesia · TaxonRamesh Raju · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Curcuma caesia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 · show in text ↑
e5

“No callus was obtained in all the single concentration of 2, 4-D used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1476 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · growth · Curcuma caesia (black zedoary)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Curcuma caesia (black zedoary)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

in vitro · growth · Curcuma caesia (black zedoary)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.