Abstract
Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties (Starkrimson, Cooper IV, Red Chief, and Mollies Delicious) were planted at 3 planting densities (1600, 1142 and 952 plants / ha) on semi-dwarf rootstock during 2002-03 and data on yield and growth were recorded after 7 years. Results indicated that maximum mean trunk cross sectional area was registered in Mollies Delicious at all the densities (103.79, 92.61 and 77.06 cm2) and lowest (67.01, 75.65 and 80.33 cm2) in Cooper IV. Largest sized fruit (177.80 g/ fruit) recorded in the S3 (952 tree/ha) and minimum (160.73 g/ fruit) in S1 density (1600 tree/ha). Maximum mean yield and yield efficiency were recorded in Starkrimson and Red Chief and minimum yield and yield efficiency in Cooper IV. Density has a detrimental effect on yield efficiency, it was maximum (0.48 kg/cm2) in S3 and minimum (0.21 cm2) in S1 density. The fruit weight increases with decrease in plant density, fruit size has negative correlation with number of fruit tree. Positive correlation was obtained between yield and yield efficiency (0.999) and planting densities with yield efficiency (0.691).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Mollies Delicious had the maximum mean trunk cross-sectional area at all planting densities (103.79, 92.61 and 77.06 cm2)
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae1 - Material
- Mollies Deliciouse2
- Outcome
- trunk cross sectional areae2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 103.79, 92.61 and 77.06 cm2e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e2“maximum mean trunk cross sectional area was registered in Mollies Delicious at all the densities (103.79, 92.61 and 77.06 cm2) and lowest (67.01, 75.65 and 80.33 cm2) in Cooper IV”
Claim · model-written summary
Cooper IV had the lowest mean trunk cross-sectional area at the three planting densities (67.01, 75.65 and 80.33 cm2)
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Cooper IVe2
- Outcome
- trunk cross sectional areae2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Value
- 67.01, 75.65 and 80.33 cm2e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e2“maximum mean trunk cross sectional area was registered in Mollies Delicious at all the densities (103.79, 92.61 and 77.06 cm2) and lowest (67.01, 75.65 and 80.33 cm2) in Cooper IV”
Claim · model-written summary
The largest fruit (177.80 g/fruit) was recorded at the S3 density (952 trees/ha)
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- S3 (952 tree/ha)e3
- Outcome
- fruite3
- Direction
- Largest sizede3
- Value
- 177.80 g/ fruite3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e3“Largest sized fruit (177.80 g/ fruit) recorded in the S3 (952 tree/ha) and minimum (160.73 g/ fruit) in S1 density (1600 tree/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
The smallest fruit (160.73 g/fruit) was recorded at the S1 density (1600 trees/ha)
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- S1 density (1600 tree/ha)e3
- Outcome
- fruite3
- Direction
- minimume3
- Value
- 160.73 g/ fruite3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e3“Largest sized fruit (177.80 g/ fruit) recorded in the S3 (952 tree/ha) and minimum (160.73 g/ fruit) in S1 density (1600 tree/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Starkrimson and Red Chief had the maximum mean yield and yield efficiency
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Starkrimson and Red Chiefe4
- Outcome
- yield and yield efficiencye4
- Direction
- Maximume4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e4“Maximum mean yield and yield efficiency were recorded in Starkrimson and Red Chief and minimum yield and yield efficiency in Cooper IV”
Claim · model-written summary
Cooper IV had the minimum mean yield and yield efficiency
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Material
- Cooper IVe4
- Outcome
- yield and yield efficiencye4
- Direction
- minimume4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e4“Maximum mean yield and yield efficiency were recorded in Starkrimson and Red Chief and minimum yield and yield efficiency in Cooper IV”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield efficiency was maximum (0.48 kg/cm2) at the S3 density
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- S3e5
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 0.48 kg/cm2e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e5“Density has a detrimental effect on yield efficiency, it was maximum (0.48 kg/cm2) in S3 and minimum (0.21 cm2) in S1 density”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield efficiency was minimum (0.21 cm2) at the S1 density
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- S1 densitye5
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye5
- Direction
- minimume5
- Value
- 0.21 cm2e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e5“Density has a detrimental effect on yield efficiency, it was maximum (0.48 kg/cm2) in S3 and minimum (0.21 cm2) in S1 density”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting density had a detrimental effect on yield efficiency
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- Densitye5
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye5
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e5“Density has a detrimental effect on yield efficiency, it was maximum (0.48 kg/cm2) in S3 and minimum (0.21 cm2) in S1 density”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight increases as plant density decreases
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- plant densitye6
- Outcome
- fruit weighte6
- Direction
- increasese6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e6“The fruit weight increases with decrease in plant density”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit size is negatively correlated with the number of fruit per tree
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- number of fruit treee7
- Outcome
- fruit sizee7
- Direction
- negative correlatione7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e7“fruit size has negative correlation with number of fruit tree”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield and yield efficiency are positively correlated (0.999)
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye7
- Direction
- Positive correlatione7
- Value
- 0.999e7
- Comparator
- yielde7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e7“Positive correlation was obtained between yield and yield efficiency (0.999) and planting densities with yield efficiency (0.691)”
Claim · model-written summary
Planting density is positively correlated with yield efficiency (0.691)
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae1
- Treatment
- planting densitiese7
- Outcome
- yield efficiencye7
- Direction
- Positive correlatione7
- Value
- 0.691e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Four apple (Malus × domestica Borkh) varieties”
e7“Positive correlation was obtained between yield and yield efficiency (0.999) and planting densities with yield efficiency (0.691)”