Paper · 2019 · Pesticide Research Journal

Brown Manure Species, Weeds and Maize in a Co-Culture in the Field: Who Stands More Competitive?

Biswaranjan Behera; TK Das

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during rainy season (kharif) 2017 at New Delhi to evaluate the competition among the brown manuring species, Sesbania bispinosa and Crotalaria juncea, weeds and maize in a coculture/mixed stand. Results showed that maize was the most competitive with significantly higher growth rates at 25 and 35 d after sowing (DAS). The order of competitiveness was: maize > Sesbania > Crotalaria > weeds. After knocking down Sesbania and Crotalaria, maize continued to be superior competitor than weeds. In terms of weed suppression (~weed control index 91.9%), mixed stand of Sesbania bispinosa (12.5 kg seed ha-1) + Crotalaria juncea (12.5 kg seed ha-1) after knocking down at 35 DAS using 2, 4-D was most superior and similar to weed-free control. But, when Sesbania + Crotalaria was knocked down at 25 DAS, it resulted in greater maize plant height (189.2 cm), crop biomass (692.1 g m-2), total N uptake (123.4 kg ha-1) and cob yield (6.94 t ha-1) than at 35 DAS. Therefore, co-culture of brown manure involving a pre-emergence herbicide was more competitive against weeds and the dead residue proved to be stimulative to maize crop for boosting growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize had significantly higher growth rates at 25 and 35 DAS and was the strongest competitor.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
growth ratese0
Direction
highere0
Setting
New Delhie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize was the most competitive with significantly higher growth rates at 25 and 35 d after sowing (DAS). The order of competitiveness was: maize > Sesbania > Crotalaria > weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“at New Delhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize remained a superior competitor to weeds after brown manure knockdown.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
superior competitore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After knocking down Sesbania and Crotalaria, maize continued to be superior competitor than weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixed Sesbania and Crotalaria stand knocked down at 35 DAS gave 91.9% weed control index, similar to weed-free control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mixed stand of Sesbania bispinosa (12.5 kg seed ha-1) + Crotalaria juncea (12.5 kg seed ha-1)e0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Second interactor
Sesbania bispinosaSesbania bispinosae0other
Outcome
weed suppressione1
Direction
most superiore0
Value
91.9%e1
Comparator
weed-free controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · Second interactorXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixed stand of Sesbania bispinosa (12.5 kg seed ha-1) + Crotalaria juncea (12.5 kg seed ha-1) after knocking down at 35 DAS using 2, 4-D was most superior and similar to weed-free control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed suppression (~weed control index 91.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knockdown at 25 DAS gave greater maize plant height than 35 DAS, reaching 189.2 cm.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
25 DASe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
189.2 cme0
Comparator
35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when Sesbania + Crotalaria was knocked down at 25 DAS, it resulted in greater maize plant height (189.2 cm), crop biomass (692.1 g m-2), total N uptake (123.4 kg ha-1) and cob yield (6.94 t ha-1) than at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knockdown at 25 DAS gave greater maize biomass than 35 DAS, reaching 692.1 g m-2.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
25 DASe0
Outcome
crop biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
692.1 g m-2e0
Comparator
35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when Sesbania + Crotalaria was knocked down at 25 DAS, it resulted in greater maize plant height (189.2 cm), crop biomass (692.1 g m-2), total N uptake (123.4 kg ha-1) and cob yield (6.94 t ha-1) than at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knockdown at 25 DAS gave greater maize nitrogen uptake than 35 DAS, reaching 123.4 kg ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
25 DASe0
Outcome
total N uptakee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
123.4 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when Sesbania + Crotalaria was knocked down at 25 DAS, it resulted in greater maize plant height (189.2 cm), crop biomass (692.1 g m-2), total N uptake (123.4 kg ha-1) and cob yield (6.94 t ha-1) than at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Knockdown at 25 DAS gave greater maize cob yield than 35 DAS, reaching 6.94 t ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
25 DASe0
Outcome
cob yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
6.94 t ha-1e0
Comparator
35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when Sesbania + Crotalaria was knocked down at 25 DAS, it resulted in greater maize plant height (189.2 cm), crop biomass (692.1 g m-2), total N uptake (123.4 kg ha-1) and cob yield (6.94 t ha-1) than at 35 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–990 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded brown manure co-culture and residue suppressed weeds and stimulated maize growth and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
more competitive against weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-culture of brown manure involving a pre-emergence herbicide was more competitive against weeds and the dead residue proved to be stimulative to maize crop for boosting growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1190 · show in text ↑

Sesbania bispinosa · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Crotalaria juncea · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.