Paper · 2017 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Impact of Drought Stress on Maize (Zea mays) Plant in Presence or Absence of Salicylic Acid Spraying

Dina Ghazi

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during the summer season of 2013 at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University to study the impact of spraying salicylic acid (SA) on mitigating the negative effect of drought conditions on maize hybrid plants (cross cv. Giza 10). The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications. In the present study, three levels (100, 75 and 50 % of water holding capacity) were arranged as main plots and two foliar applications of salicylic acid (zero "sprayed with tap water as control treatment" and 200 mg.L-1) as sub-plots. The results showed that growth parameters, plant height (cm), fresh and dry weight of flag leaf (g), yield components (cob length (cm), no of grains/cob, 100 grains weight (g), grain yield, straw yield, cob yield ton/fed), mineral content of leaves (N, P and K in flag leaf), seed quality characteristics (crude protein, oil content and total carbohydrates %) were significantly decreased with drought stressat 50% of water holding capacity. While, the effect of salicylic acid sprayed at rate of 200 mg.L-1 on the previously mentioned traits recorded positive impact of high water deficit as compared with the control treatment (zero mg L-1 SA) which gave the lowest parameters. N, P and K concentrations in tested soil were significantly response (P ≤ 0.05) to drought stress, foliar spraying of (SA) and their combinations. Reduced level of water application at 50% resulted in decreases in the concentration of available N, P and K in soil. The highest concentrations of available N, P and K in soil were recorded at 75% of water holding capacity combined with 200 mg.L-1 SA, while the lowest concentrations were recorded at 50% of water holding capacity in the absence of spraying with SA. It can be conclude that, foliar application of salicylic acid at rate of 200 mg.L-1 could be used as appropriate growth regulator for reducing the negative effects on maize plant under water deficiency conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% water holding capacity drought significantly reduced maize growth traits.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stressat 50% of water holding capacitye0
Outcome
plant height (cm), fresh and dry weight of flag leaf (g)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth parameters, plant height (cm), fresh and dry weight of flag leaf (g), yield components (cob length (cm), no of grains/cob, 100 grains weight (g), grain yield, straw yield, cob yield ton/fed), mineral content of leaves (N, P and K in flag leaf), seed quality characteristics (crude protein, oil content and total carbohydrates %) were significantly decreased with drought stressat 50% of water holding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at 50% water holding capacity significantly reduced maize yield components and yields.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stressat 50% of water holding capacitye0
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield, cob yield ton/fede0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield components (cob length (cm), no of grains/cob, 100 grains weight (g), grain yield, straw yield, cob yield ton/fed), mineral content of leaves (N, P and K in flag leaf), seed quality characteristics (crude protein, oil content and total carbohydrates %) were significantly decreased with drought stressat 50% of water holding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at 50% water holding capacity significantly reduced leaf N, P and K.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stressat 50% of water holding capacitye0
Outcome
N, P and K in flag leafe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral content of leaves (N, P and K in flag leaf), seed quality characteristics (crude protein, oil content and total carbohydrates %) were significantly decreased with drought stressat 50% of water holding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at 50% water holding capacity significantly reduced seed protein, oil and carbohydrate traits.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stressat 50% of water holding capacitye0
Outcome
crude protein, oil content and total carbohydrates %e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed quality characteristics (crude protein, oil content and total carbohydrates %) were significantly decreased with drought stressat 50% of water holding capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid at 200 mg.L-1 improved the previously listed maize traits under severe deficit relative to the water-sprayed control.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
salicylic acid sprayed at rate of 200 mg.L-1e0
Outcome
previously mentioned traitse0
Direction
positive impacte0
Comparator
control treatment (zero mg L-1 SA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of salicylic acid sprayed at rate of 200 mg.L-1 on the previously mentioned traits recorded positive impact of high water deficit as compared with the control treatment (zero mg L-1 SA) which gave the lowest parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought, salicylic acid and their combination significantly affected soil N, P and K concentrations.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
drought stress, foliar spraying of (SA) and their combinationse0
Outcome
N, P and K concentrations in tested soile0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, P and K concentrations in tested soil were significantly response (P ≤ 0.05) to drought stress, foliar spraying of (SA) and their combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water application at 50% reduced available soil N, P and K.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
water application at 50%e0
Outcome
available N, P and K in soile0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced level of water application at 50% resulted in decreases in the concentration of available N, P and K in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N, P and K were highest at 75% water holding capacity with 200 mg.L-1 SA.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
75% of water holding capacity combined with 200 mg.L-1 SAe0
Outcome
concentrations of available N, P and K in soile0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest concentrations of available N, P and K in soil were recorded at 75% of water holding capacity combined with 200 mg.L-1 SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N, P and K were lowest at 50% water holding capacity without SA.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
50% of water holding capacity in the absence of spraying with SAe0
Outcome
lowest concentrationse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest concentrations were recorded at 50% of water holding capacity in the absence of spraying with SA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays) Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar salicylic acid at 200 mg.L-1 to reduce drought effects on maize.

Taxon
maize plantZea mayse0
Outcome
foliar application of salicylic acid at rate of 200 mg.L-1 could be used as appropriate growth regulator for reducing the negative effects on maize plant under water deficiency conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of salicylic acid at rate of 200 mg.L-1 could be used as appropriate growth regulator for reducing the negative effects on maize plant under water deficiency conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–2007 · show in text ↑

drought · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

38 papers: 11 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

drought · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

299 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

307 papers in the same direction as this paper · 77 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.