Paper · 2019 · Plant Health Progress

Efficacy of Fungicide Seed Treatments in Controlling Blackleg of Canola

Sudha GC Upadhaya; Venkataramana Chapara; Mukhlesur Rahman; et al.

7
claims
21
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The efficacy of five fungicide seed treatments as a management tool against blackleg on spring canola was evaluated under greenhouse and field conditions in North Dakota. Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans, inflicts the greatest yield losses when infecting seedlings before they reach the six-leaf growth stage. In greenhouse studies, 10-day-old seedlings were inoculated with L. maculans spore suspensions and evaluated 12 days later and at maturity or inoculated 12, 20, or 28 days after planting and evaluated at maturity. In field trials conducted in 2017 and 2018, severity was assessed at maturity. In the greenhouse, all fungicide seed treatments reduced (P = 0.05) disease severity at the seedling stage, but only the protection provided by Obvius (fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + metalaxyl) and Helix Vibrance (mefenoxam + fludioxonil + sedaxane + difenoconazole + thiamethoxam) reduced (P < 0.05) severity at the adult stage; however, none of them provide effective protection when plants were inoculated 20 days after planting or later. In field trials, none of the treatments significantly (P > 0.05) improved plant stand and yield or reduced disease incidence and severity. Although fungicide seed treatment is a valuable tool, it should not be used as the only method to manage blackleg disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the greenhouse, all fungicide seed treatments reduced blackleg disease severity at the seedling stage of spring canola.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee2
Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse2
Interactor
Leptosphaeria maculansPlenodomus lingame1pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye2
Direction
reducede2
Setting
greenhousee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the greenhouse, all fungicide seed treatments reduced (P = 0.05) disease severity at the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Obvius reduced blackleg severity of spring canola at the adult stage in the greenhouse.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Organ / stage
adult stagee3
Treatment
Obvius (fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + metalaxyl)e3
Interactor
Leptosphaeria maculansPlenodomus lingame1pathogen
Outcome
severitye3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–213 · show in text ↑
e3

“but only the protection provided by Obvius (fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + metalaxyl) and Helix Vibrance (mefenoxam + fludioxonil + sedaxane + difenoconazole + thiamethoxam) reduced (P < 0.05) severity at the adult stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Helix Vibrance reduced blackleg severity of spring canola at the adult stage in the greenhouse.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Organ / stage
adult stagee3
Treatment
Helix Vibrance (mefenoxam + fludioxonil + sedaxane + difenoconazole + thiamethoxam)e3
Interactor
Leptosphaeria maculansPlenodomus lingame1pathogen
Outcome
severitye3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–213 · show in text ↑
e3

“but only the protection provided by Obvius (fluxapyroxad + pyraclostrobin + metalaxyl) and Helix Vibrance (mefenoxam + fludioxonil + sedaxane + difenoconazole + thiamethoxam) reduced (P < 0.05) severity at the adult stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatments did not provide effective protection when spring canola plants were inoculated 20 days after planting or later.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse2
Outcome
effective protectione4
Qualifier
inoculated 20 days after planting or latere4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the greenhouse, all fungicide seed treatments reduced (P = 0.05) disease severity at the seedling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–719 · show in text ↑
e4

“none of them provide effective protection when plants were inoculated 20 days after planting or later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In field trials, fungicide seed treatments did not significantly improve spring canola plant stand or yield.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse2
Outcome
plant stand and yielde5
Direction
improvede5
Setting
field trialse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“efficacy of five fungicide seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“In field trials, none of the treatments significantly (P > 0.05) improved plant stand and yield or reduced disease incidence and severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In field trials, fungicide seed treatments did not significantly reduce blackleg incidence and severity in spring canola.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Treatment
fungicide seed treatmentse2
Interactor
Leptosphaeria maculansPlenodomus lingame1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence and severitye5
Direction
reducede5
Setting
field trialse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Plenodomus lingam
Plenodomus lingam · InteractorJie-Hao Ou · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Blackleg, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“efficacy of five fungicide seed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“In field trials, none of the treatments significantly (P > 0.05) improved plant stand and yield or reduced disease incidence and severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide seed treatment should not be used as the only method to manage blackleg disease in spring canola.

Taxon
spring canolaBrassica napus var. napuse0
Outcome
as the only method to manage blackleg diseasee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“management tool against blackleg on spring canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 52–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“it should not be used as the only method to manage blackleg disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1316 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · Plenodomus lingam · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fungicide · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

26 papers: 22 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fungicide · control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

seed treatment · Plenodomus lingam · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · Plenodomus lingam · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.