Abstract
We conducted this study over the course of two consecutive growing seasons to evaluate the response of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. et Nakai cv. Crimson Sweet) to grafting onto three Iranian rainfed and seedy watermelon landraces collected from Khaje, Sabzevar, and Ashtian, along with ‘Shintoza’ (Cucurbita maxima × Cucurbita moschata) seedlings as a rootstock for watermelon. Soil moisture content [percentage of field capacity (FC)] was determined by time domain reflectometry (TDR). Irrigation was applied in three different levels based on FC as 0.8FC-FC, 0.6FC-0.8FC and 0.3FC-0.6FC by furrow irrigation method. Yield, shoot dry weight, fruit quality, chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, relative water content (RWC), electrolyte leakage, and proline concentration were measured at the end of both growing seasons. The results showed that the highest fruit yield (9.4 kg) and shoot dry weight (390.8 g) were obtained in watermelons grafted onto Shintoza rootstock in 0.8FC-FC. The lowest fruit yield (1.4 kg) and shoot dry weight (55.6 g) were observed in un-grafted controls and in 0.3FC-0.6FC. Fruit quality in watermelons grafted onto Shintoza rootstock was significantly different compared to the other grafting combinations and the un-grafted control. Chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, RWC, electrolyte leakage, and proline were significantly affected by irrigation regimes. Shintoza and Sabzevar grafting combinations showed high levels of chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, and RWC as compared to un-grafted plants and Ashtian grafting combination.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Shintoza grafting at high irrigation gave the highest fruit yield.
- Taxon
- watermelons
Citrullus lanatuse0 - Material
- Shintozae0
- Treatment
- grafted onto Shintoza rootstock in 0.8FC-FCe0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 9.4 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest fruit yield (9.4 kg) and shoot dry weight (390.8 g) were obtained in watermelons grafted onto Shintoza rootstock in 0.8FC-FC”
Claim · model-written summary
Shintoza grafting at high irrigation gave the highest shoot dry weight.
- Taxon
- watermelons
Citrullus lanatuse0 - Material
- Shintozae0
- Treatment
- grafted onto Shintoza rootstock in 0.8FC-FCe0
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 390.8 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“highest fruit yield (9.4 kg) and shoot dry weight (390.8 g) were obtained in watermelons grafted onto Shintoza rootstock in 0.8FC-FC”
Claim · model-written summary
Ungrafted controls at low irrigation had the lowest fruit yield.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatust0 - Material
- un-grafted controlse0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1.4 kge0
- Qualifier
- 0.3FC-0.6FCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lowest fruit yield (1.4 kg) and shoot dry weight (55.6 g) were observed in un-grafted controls and in 0.3FC-0.6FC”
t0“Watermelon Landraces”
Claim · model-written summary
Ungrafted controls at low irrigation had the lowest shoot dry weight.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatust0 - Material
- un-grafted controlse0
- Outcome
- shoot dry weighte0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 55.6 ge0
- Qualifier
- 0.3FC-0.6FCe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lowest fruit yield (1.4 kg) and shoot dry weight (55.6 g) were observed in un-grafted controls and in 0.3FC-0.6FC”
t0“Watermelon Landraces”
Claim · model-written summary
Shintoza rootstock significantly changed fruit quality versus other grafts and ungrafted controls.
- Taxon
- watermelons
Citrullus lanatuse0 - Treatment
- grafted onto Shintoza rootstocke0
- Outcome
- Fruit qualitye0
- Comparator
- the other grafting combinations and the un-grafted controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit quality in watermelons grafted onto Shintoza rootstock was significantly different compared to the other grafting combinations and the un-grafted control”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation regimes significantly affected chlorophyll index, phenolics, RWC, electrolyte leakage and proline.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatust0 - Treatment
- irrigation regimese0
- Outcome
- Chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, RWC, electrolyte leakage, and prolinee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, RWC, electrolyte leakage, and proline were significantly affected by irrigation regimes”
t0“Watermelon Landraces”
Claim · model-written summary
Shintoza and Sabzevar grafts had higher chlorophyll index, phenolics and RWC than ungrafted and Ashtian plants.
- Taxon
- watermelon
Citrullus lanatust0 - Treatment
- Shintoza and Sabzevar grafting combinationse0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, and RWCe0
- Direction
- high levelse0
- Comparator
- un-grafted plants and Ashtian grafting combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Shintoza and Sabzevar grafting combinations showed high levels of chlorophyll index, phenolic compounds, and RWC as compared to un-grafted plants and Ashtian grafting combination”
t0“Watermelon Landraces”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →grafting · growth · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →grafting · physiology: water · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.