Paper · 2019 · The Journal of Development Studies

Sustainability of the Economic Benefit of Bt Cotton in China: Results from Household Surveys

Fangbin Qiao; Jikun Huang

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In recent years, the sustainability of the economic benefit of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops has been subject to substantial debate. Using seven rounds of household survey data, this study shows that the economic benefit continued for 15 years after the commercialisation of Bt cotton in China. Owing to Bt cotton adoption, farmers have saved 8.46 billion US dollars on pesticide use during 1997–2012. This number is more than double if the benefits of increased yield, decreased labour use, and increased seed cost are considered. More importantly, the total quantity of pesticides used has been reduced by 2.19 million tons nationally during 1997–2012.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Economic benefits of Bt cotton persisted for 15 years after commercialization in China.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Outcome
economic benefite0
Direction
continuede0
Value
15 yearse0
Setting
Chinae0

Verbatim

e0

“the economic benefit continued for 15 years after the commercialisation of Bt cotton in China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton adoption saved farmers 8.46 billion US dollars on pesticide use during 1997–2012.

Taxon
Bt cottone0
Treatment
Bt cotton adoptione0
Outcome
pesticide usee0
Direction
savede0
Value
8.46 billion US dollarse0
Qualifier
during 1997–2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Owing to Bt cotton adoption, farmers have saved 8.46 billion US dollars on pesticide use during 1997–2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total economic benefits were more than double pesticide savings when yield, labor and seed costs were included.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Outcome
benefitse0
Direction
more than doublee0
Qualifier
increased yield, decreased labour use, and increased seed coste0

Verbatim

e0

“This number is more than double if the benefits of increased yield, decreased labour use, and increased seed cost are considered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–534 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton adoption increased yield.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
Bt cotton adoptione1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the benefits of increased yield, decreased labour use, and increased seed cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton adoption decreased labor use.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
Bt cotton adoptione1
Outcome
labour usee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield, decreased labour use, and increased seed cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton adoption increased seed cost.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
Bt cotton adoptione1
Outcome
seed coste0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increased yield, decreased labour use, and increased seed cost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–519 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–326 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

National pesticide quantity fell by 2.19 million tons during 1997–2012.

Taxon
Bt cottone1
Treatment
Bt cotton adoptione1
Outcome
total quantity of pesticides usede0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.19 million tonse0
Qualifier
during 1997–2012e0
Setting
nationallye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the total quantity of pesticides used has been reduced by 2.19 million tons nationally during 1997–2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bt cotton adoption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–326 · show in text ↑

transgenic · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 24 positive, 3 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

transgenic · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 74 positive, 4 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.