Paper · 2019 · Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center

Integration of some biopesticides against potato tuber moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Zell.), during storage with reference to histopathological changes detected by a transmission electron microscope in the endocrine system

Aziza Mohamed Fouad Sharaby; Mohamed Ahmed Gesraha; Sahar Ahmed Baker Fallatah

13
claims
38
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The potato tuber moth (PTM), Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is an important pest. It attacks several cultivated solanaceous plants including potato ( Solanum tubersum ), tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum ), eggplant ( Solanum melonguene ), tomato ( Lycopersicom esculentum ), and bell pepper ( Capasicum annuum ). It has also been reported to be found on several wild plant hosts of the following genera: Solanum , Datura , Nicotiana , Fabina , Hyoscyamus , Physalodes , Lycium , and Nicandra . All over the world, it is the most important insect pest in potato field and storage under subtropical warms and dry summer conditions. The larvae attack both foliage and tubers in the field and infested tubers brought into heaps. This research focuses on (a) the compatibility of Bacillus thuringiensis (Dipel-2X DF) and granulosis virus (GV virus) with plant basil extract ( Ocimum basilicum ), an aromatic plant, as a component of integrated pest management system against the potato tuber moth during storage and (b) histopathological changes detected in the endocrine system by a transmission electron microscope. 1. Insect culture rearing A stock laboratory colony of PTM was initiated on potato tubers. The culture was maintained following the method of Sharaby and Fallatah (Bull NRC Egypt 43: 79–85, 2019). The culture and all experiments were maintained under room conditions of 27 ± 2 °C and 70 ± 5% RH with a light regime (10:14 L:D). New clean potato tubers were added every 10 days for egg deposition and to keep a continuous culture. 2. Basil plant extract All parts of the basil plant ( Ocimum basilicum ) which was obtained from fields in June after 3 months of plantation were dried in a shad place then minced into fine powder in an electric mill. The weight of the plant powder (500 g) was filled into the Soxhlet apparatus and extracted with ethanol (85%) that was used as a solvent. 3. Biological aspects of plant basil extract and the microbial insecticides (Dipel-2X DF (32,000 international units of potency/mg (equivalent to 32 billion international units of potency/KG Registration NO. 26508) and granulosis virus (GV)) Basil extract was mixed with the microbial insecticides in order to study the combined effects on different biological aspects. Five millilitres of each of the tested substances (basil extract + B.t + GV) was mixed with 95-g commercial carrier material (talcum powder) and left to dry under room temperature; then, 1 kg of potato was treated by 25 g of the treated talcum powder w / w (to be used as dust). The three bioagents were tested separately and in different combinations. Two control groups were used (treated talcum powder and the other talcum powder without treatment). Different biological parameters and development of PTM were estimated. The remaining alive treated larvae were collected from inside the treated tubers after 13 days of hatching. Larvae were taken for ultrastructure investigations using the transmission electron microscope (TEM). To investigate the ultrastructure changes on the endocrine glands of the treated larvae, the brain neurosecretory cells, corpus cardiacum, corpus allatum, and prothoracic gland, were examined. Untreated larvae of the same age were used as control. In the data recorded, it is clear that there are insignificant differences at P < 0.01 of the mean number of deposited eggs that were laid on potato tubers treated by talcum powder mixed with the three additives (basil extract + B.t + GV) (3.0 eggs/♀) and on tuber treated by powder containing basil extract only (4.6 eggs/♀) and nearly equal difference in the B.t + extract or GV + extract (cleared 4.0 and 5.0 eggs/♀, respectively); no differences in treatments by B.t or GV when used separately were found compared with the two control treatments of talcum powder only or the untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀). The most effective combination was the mixture of the three additives: the mean number of emerged adults was 0.4, while it ranged from 1.2 to 14.4 for the other treatments compared with the two controls 35.4 and 37.2 individuals. The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments, and the lowest percentage (13.3%) was recorded for extract + B.t + GV; for other treatments, the percentage ranged from 25.00 to 54.96% compared with 92.20 and 98.40% in the two control treatments. Histopathological changes on the endocrine glands of the larvae that were detected by the electron microscope have been recorded. This research revealed that an additive effect was produced using a combination of three bioagents (basil plant extract + B.t + GV) against the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella . The combination of the three elements in one formulation may reduce the initial amount of potato destruction, decrease insect resistance build-up, and reduce the need for chemical insecticides and their associated risks. The obtained results suggested an interesting opportunity to develop bio-insecticides based on plant extracts for the control of this serious lepidopteran pest and other pests during storage, so usage of the mentioned combined mixture for controlling and protecting the tubers from increasing their toxicity could be recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three additives reduced eggs laid on potato tubers to 3.0 eggs per female.

Treatment
basil extract + B.t + GVe0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
eggs/♀e0
Direction
decreasee2
Value
3.0 eggs/♀e0
Comparator
untreated tuberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“talcum powder mixed with the three additives (basil extract + B.t + GV) (3.0 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3443–3527 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3855–3885 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil extract alone yielded 4.6 eggs per female.

Treatment
basil extract onlye0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
eggs/♀e0
Direction
decreasee2
Value
4.6 eggs/♀e0
Comparator
untreated tuberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tuber treated by powder containing basil extract only (4.6 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3535–3601 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3855–3885 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B.t plus extract yielded 4.0 eggs per female.

Treatment
B.t + extracte0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
eggs/♀e0
Direction
decreasee2
Value
4.0e0
Comparator
untreated tuberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B.t + extract or GV + extract (cleared 4.0 and 5.0 eggs/♀, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3637–3709 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3855–3885 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GV plus extract yielded 5.0 eggs per female.

Treatment
GV + extracte0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
eggs/♀e0
Direction
decreasee2
Value
5.0 eggs/♀e0
Comparator
untreated tuberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GV + extract (cleared 4.0 and 5.0 eggs/♀, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3654–3709 · show in text ↑
e1

“untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3855–3885 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B.t alone did not differ from controls in egg deposition.

Treatment
B.te0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
eggs/♀e0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
the two control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in treatments by B.t or GV when used separately were found compared with the two control treatments of talcum powder only or the untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3711–3885 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GV alone did not differ from controls in egg deposition.

Treatment
GVe0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
eggs/♀e0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
the two control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no differences in treatments by B.t or GV when used separately were found compared with the two control treatments of talcum powder only or the untreated tubers (38.2 eggs/♀)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3711–3885 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-additive mixture had the fewest emerged adults, 0.4.

Treatment
mixture of the three additivese0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
mean number of emerged adultse0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
0.4e0
Comparator
the two controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective combination was the mixture of the three additives: the mean number of emerged adults was 0.4, while it ranged from 1.2 to 14.4 for the other treatments compared with the two controls 35.4 and 37.2 individuals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3887–4116 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatments produced 1.2 to 14.4 emerged adults versus 35.4 and 37.2 for controls.

Treatment
other treatmentse0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
emerged adultse1
Direction
decreasede2
Value
1.2 to 14.4e0
Comparator
the two controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it ranged from 1.2 to 14.4 for the other treatments compared with the two controls 35.4 and 37.2 individuals.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4007–4116 · show in text ↑
e1

“the mean number of emerged adults was 0.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3958–3999 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-additive mixture produced the lowest F1 emergence, 13.3%.

Treatment
extract + B.t + GVe0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
percentage of emerged F 1e1
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.3%e0
Comparator
two control treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest percentage (13.3%) was recorded for extract + B.t + GV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4202–4267 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments, and the lowest percentage (13.3%) was recorded for extract + B.t + GV; for other treatments, the percentage ranged from 25.00 to 54.96% compared with 92.20 and 98.40% in the two control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4395 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other treatments produced F1 emergence of 25.00 to 54.96%, below controls.

Treatment
other treatmentse0
Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
percentagee0
Direction
decreasede1
Value
25.00 to 54.96%e0
Comparator
the two control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for other treatments, the percentage ranged from 25.00 to 54.96% compared with 92.20 and 98.40% in the two control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4269–4395 · show in text ↑
e1

“The percentage of emerged F 1 was greatly decreased by the different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4117–4196 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated larvae showed endocrine gland histopathology.

Interactor
potato tuber motht0pest
Outcome
Histopathological changes on the endocrine glands of the larvaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Histopathological changes on the endocrine glands of the larvae that were detected by the electron microscope have been recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4396–4525 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato tuber moth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three bioagents had an additive effect against potato tuber moth.

Treatment
basil plant extract + B.t + GVe0
Interactor
Phthorimaea operculellaPhthorimaea operculellae0pest
Outcome
additive effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phthorimaea operculella
Phthorimaea operculella · InteractorCaroline Harding, MAF · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an additive effect was produced using a combination of three bioagents (basil plant extract + B.t + GV) against the potato tuber moth Phthorimaea operculella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4554–4711 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended the combined mixture for protecting stored potato tubers.

Outcome
usage of the mentioned combined mixture for controlling and protecting the tuberse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“usage of the mentioned combined mixture for controlling and protecting the tubers from increasing their toxicity could be recommended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5130–5264 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑

botanical · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.