Paper · 2016 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

Response of Cantaloupe Yield, Yield Components and Quality to Irrigation Rates and Soil Amendments Under Drip Irrigation in Calcareous Soils

A. Abdel-Halim; M. Ramadan

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A two-season field experiment was carried out in the newly reclaimed calcareous soils of the Horticulture Research Station at Nubaria region during 2010 and 2011 summer seasons. The objectives of this research were to study the effect of two irrigation rates and five soil amendments treatments on cantaloupe yield, yield components, and quality as well as amounts of applied irrigation water and water use efficiency. The treatments were assessed in a split plot design with three replicates, where the tested irrigation rates e.g. 100 and 80% ETc were represented in the main plots, while and the five soil amendment treatments (control without any soil amendments, organic matter (20 m3fed-1), organic matter + polymer (0.1% on mass basis) +, organic matter + organic matter+ taflah (0.2% on mass basis) and organic matter+ polymer + taflah +) were allocated to the subplots. The obtained results showed that:1- The growth parameters e.g. number of branches 98-1 and branch length were significantly affected by the adopted irrigation rates and soil amendment treatments. Irrigation regime 100% ETc exhibited the highest values for both growth traits, comparable with 80% ETc regime. The soil amendment treatments (OM +Tafla) and (OM + Tafla+ Polymer) resulted in the higher figures of Number of branches plant-1 in first and second seasons, respectively. Branch length trait was the highest with (OM + T + P) soil conditioner treatment in the first and second seasons.2- Average number of fruits plant-1 was increased with 80% ETc regime in the first and second seasons compared with 100% ETc regime. Average Fruit weight plant-1 exhibited different trend, where the values were increased under100% ETc regime, in the first and second seasons, comparing with 80% ETc regime. The soil amendment treatment (OM +Tafla+ Polymer) attained the highest figures of number of fruits plant-1 and fruit weight plant-1, in first and second seasons.3-Irrigation regime (80% ETc) insignificantly increased total fresh yield of cantaloupe crop, comparable with 100% ETc in the first and second seasons. The adopted soil amendment treatments revealed significant influence to affect total fresh yield of cantaloupe, and (OM + Tafla+ Polymer) resulted in the highest figures reached to 16.36 and 14.77 t/fed, respectively, in the first and second seasons.4- The TSS exhibited a reversed response with the assessed irrigation rates, and increased with lower irrigation rate and vice versa and such trend was true in the first and second seasons. The highest figurers of TSS were recorded with (OM + Tafla) treatment, in the first and second seasons.5- Applied Irrigation Water during 2007 and 2008 seasons were 1342 and 1074 m3/fed for 100% and 80% ETc regimes, respectively, and the peak of applied water was during fruit formation stage (July). Water use efficiency (WUE) values were increased with 80% ETc regime, comparable with 100% ETc regime. The soil amendment treatment (OM+ Tafla+ Polymer) was superior to improve WUE for cantaloupe in comparison with the others soil amendment treatments.6-Based on the obtained results, it is advisable to irrigate cantaloupe crop with amount of water equals to 80% ETc and supplying the soil conditioner composed of (tafla + organic matter + polymer) to attain the highest fruit yield, growth parameters, yield components, fruit quality, as well as improved water productivity of cantaloupe crop under the circumstances of the present research work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% ETc irrigation regime gave the highest growth-trait values (branch number and branch length), comparable with 80% ETc.

Treatment
100% ETce1
Outcome
growth traitse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
80% ETc regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation regime 100% ETc exhibited the highest values for both growth traits, comparable with 80% ETc regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla amendment gave a higher number of branches per plant in the first season.

Treatment
OM +Taflae1
Outcome
Number of branches plant-1e1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil amendment treatments (OM +Tafla) and (OM + Tafla+ Polymer) resulted in the higher figures of Number of branches plant-1 in first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla + Polymer amendment gave a higher number of branches per plant in the second season.

Treatment
OM + Tafla+ Polymere1
Outcome
Number of branches plant-1e1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil amendment treatments (OM +Tafla) and (OM + Tafla+ Polymer) resulted in the higher figures of Number of branches plant-1 in first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch length was highest with the OM + T + P soil conditioner.

Treatment
OM + T + Pe1
Outcome
Branch lengthe1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Branch length trait was the highest with (OM + T + P) soil conditioner treatment in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% ETc regime increased the average number of fruits per plant compared with 100% ETc.

Treatment
80% ETc regimee1
Outcome
Average number of fruits plant-1e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
100% ETc regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average number of fruits plant-1 was increased with 80% ETc regime in the first and second seasons compared with 100% ETc regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% ETc regime increased the average fruit weight per plant compared with 80% ETc.

Treatment
100% ETc regimee1
Outcome
Average Fruit weight plant-1e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
80% ETc regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average Fruit weight plant-1 exhibited different trend, where the values were increased under100% ETc regime, in the first and second seasons, comparing with 80% ETc regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla + Polymer amendment gave the highest number of fruits and fruit weight per plant.

Treatment
OM +Tafla+ Polymere1
Outcome
number of fruits plant-1 and fruit weight plant-1e1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil amendment treatment (OM +Tafla+ Polymer) attained the highest figures of number of fruits plant-1 and fruit weight plant-1, in first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% ETc regime insignificantly increased total fresh yield, comparable with 100% ETc.

Treatment
80% ETce1
Outcome
total fresh yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
100% ETce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation regime (80% ETc) insignificantly increased total fresh yield of cantaloupe crop, comparable with 100% ETc in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1942–2090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla + Polymer amendment gave the highest total fresh yield in the first season, 16.36 t/fed.

Treatment
OM + Tafla+ Polymere1
Outcome
total fresh yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
16.36e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The adopted soil amendment treatments revealed significant influence to affect total fresh yield of cantaloupe, and (OM + Tafla+ Polymer) resulted in the highest figures reached to 16.36 and 14.77 t/fed, respectively, in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla + Polymer amendment gave the highest total fresh yield in the second season, 14.77 t/fed.

Treatment
OM + Tafla+ Polymere1
Outcome
total fresh yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
14.77 t/fede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The adopted soil amendment treatments revealed significant influence to affect total fresh yield of cantaloupe, and (OM + Tafla+ Polymer) resulted in the highest figures reached to 16.36 and 14.77 t/fed, respectively, in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2092–2341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS increased with lower irrigation rate.

Treatment
lower irrigation ratee1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The TSS exhibited a reversed response with the assessed irrigation rates, and increased with lower irrigation rate and vice versa and such trend was true in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2345–2530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla amendment gave the highest TSS.

Treatment
OM + Taflae1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest figurers of TSS were recorded with (OM + Tafla) treatment, in the first and second seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2532–2634 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied irrigation water under 100% ETc was 1342 m3/fed.

Outcome
Applied Irrigation Watere1
Value
1342e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied Irrigation Water during 2007 and 2008 seasons were 1342 and 1074 m3/fed for 100% and 80% ETc regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2638–2746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied irrigation water under 80% ETc was 1074 m3/fed.

Outcome
Applied Irrigation Watere1
Value
1074e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applied Irrigation Water during 2007 and 2008 seasons were 1342 and 1074 m3/fed for 100% and 80% ETc regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2638–2746 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency increased with the 80% ETc regime, comparable with 100% ETc.

Treatment
80% ETc regimee1
Outcome
Water use efficiency (WUE) valuese1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
100% ETc regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“Water use efficiency (WUE) values were increased with 80% ETc regime, comparable with 100% ETc regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2833–2934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OM + Tafla + Polymer amendment was superior to the other amendments in improving water use efficiency.

Treatment
OM+ Tafla+ Polymere1
Outcome
improve WUEe1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
the others soil amendment treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil amendment treatment (OM+ Tafla+ Polymer) was superior to improve WUE for cantaloupe in comparison with the others soil amendment treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2936–3084 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigating cantaloupe at 80% ETc is advisable.

Outcome
irrigate cantaloupe crop with amount of water equals to 80% ETce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“it is advisable to irrigate cantaloupe crop with amount of water equals to 80% ETc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3118–3200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation rates and soil amendment treatments significantly affected the number of branches and branch length.

Treatment
irrigation rates and soil amendment treatmentse1
Outcome
number of branches 98-1 and branch lengthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Response of Cantaloupe Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 · show in text ↑
e1

“The growth parameters e.g. number of branches 98-1 and branch length were significantly affected by the adopted irrigation rates and soil amendment treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1073 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.