Paper · 2017 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Nano Chitosan on Growth, Physiological and Biochemical Parameters of Phaseolus vulgaris under Salt Stress

M. Zayed; S. Elkafafi; Amina Zedan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
102
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salt stress is one of the abiotic stresses; it is a major factor which reduces crop productivity. Nano particles have become a pioneer material in agriculture research nowadays because they have unique physicochemical properties. This study aimed to investigate the effects of chitosan nanoparticles on germination and seedling growth parameters under salt stress condition for bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Moreover the effect of nano chitosan combined with selected concentration of salinity (100mM NaCl) on germination and vegetative growth was also examined. Different concentrations of salinity (50 mM, 100 mM and 150 mM NaCl) was used. Data indicated that salinity decreased salt tolerance index S.T.I of germination percentage as well as seedling growth. The bad effect was higher in 150 mM concentration; so the second experiment was continued with the 100 mM NaCl concentration. The treatment of bean plantwith 100 mM of salt combined with different concentration of nano chitosan (0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3%) indicated that nano chitosan in all concentrations significantly promoted seed germination and radical length under salt stress. The best treatment on germination was 0.3 % of nano chitosan. Growth variables (plant height, leaf area, fresh and dry weights of the shoot and root) were increased significantly. High significant increase in both M.S.I and Chl.a, similarly , catalase , proline, RWC, Chl.b , caroteniods and antioxident enzymes showed positive eefect at 0.1% concentrarion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity decreased germination salt tolerance index and seedling growth.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
salinitye0
Outcome
salt tolerance index S.T.I of germination percentage as well as seedling growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“salinity decreased salt tolerance index S.T.I of germination percentage as well as seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–765 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The adverse salinity effect was greater at 150 mM.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
150 mM concentratione0
Outcome
bad effecte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The bad effect was higher in 150 mM concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All nano chitosan concentrations significantly promoted bean seed germination and radical length under salt stress.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
nano chitosan in all concentrationse0
Outcome
seed germination and radical lengthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nano chitosan in all concentrations significantly promoted seed germination and radical length under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0.3 % nano chitosan treatment produced the best germination result.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
0.3 % of nano chitosane0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The best treatment on germination was 0.3 % of nano chitosan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth variables increased significantly under nano chitosan treatment.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
nano chitosane1
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, fresh and dry weights of the shoot and roote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth variables (plant height, leaf area, fresh and dry weights of the shoot and root) were increased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1324 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment of bean plantwith 100 mM of salt combined with different concentration of nano chitosan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M.S.I and Chl.a increased highly significantly.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
nano chitosane1
Outcome
M.S.I and Chl.ae0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High significant increase in both M.S.I and Chl.a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1375 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatment of bean plantwith 100 mM of salt combined with different concentration of nano chitosan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Catalase, proline, RWC, Chl.b, caroteniods, and antioxidant enzymes showed a positive effect at 0.1% concentration.

Taxon
bean plante1
Treatment
0.1% concentrarione0
Outcome
catalase , proline, RWC, Chl.b , caroteniods and antioxident enzymese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“catalase , proline, RWC, Chl.b , caroteniods and antioxident enzymes showed positive eefect at 0.1% concentrarion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1502 · show in text ↑
e1

“bean plant (Phaseolus vulgaris L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–411 · show in text ↑

chitosan · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

salinity · tolerance: abiotic · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.