Paper · 2019 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Implementing the systems approach in rice pest management : India context

RK Tanwar; S Singh; SP Singh; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A basic IPM module for basmati rice as a part of integrated crop management accounting the pest prevalence and the information available from literature has been developed. As the module is location specific and dynamic, therefore needs regular updating and fine tuning depending on the location and pest prevalence. The technology has been successfully validated and implemented during 1998 to 2019 in Pusa Basmati 1, Taraori Basmati, Dehraduni Basmati, Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand with little modification and fine tuning. Implementation of the technology resulted in increase in rice grain yield i.e., 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradesh 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur in Haryana, 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand, 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana and 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmer's practices (FP). In all the basmati rice trials, higher yield as well as Benefit - Cost (B-C) ratio was obtained in IPM as compared to FP. Implementation of IPM led to significant reduction in uses of chemical pesticides. In case of IPM, only 1.46 application of chemical pesticides (103.2 g a.i./ha) were undertaken in Pusa Basmati 1121 against 2.8 application in FP (1214.4 g a.i./ha) at Bambawad, Uttar Pradesh. ICAR-NRRI, Cuttack developed and validated IPM module at Sigmapur (Cuttack, Odisha) non-Basmati rice variety Pooja for four kharif seasons i.e 2010-2013 using standard agronomic practices. The trial resulted in an enhancement of 47.1% yield and 26.47 % B-C ratio over FP. Additional income of Rs. 9857/- per ha was also obtained in IPM over FP. On-Farm trial on validation of IPM module in non-Basmati rice (Pooja variety) under semi deep water conditions conducted in 10 ha during rabi 2017 at Nagapur and Basudeipur villages in Khurda district of Odisha resulted in reduction in the incidence of insect pests and diseases with higher population of natural enemies as compared to FP. Rice yield was recorded 5600 kg ha-1 in IPM as against 4900 kg ha-1 in FP. Recently, ICT based e-pest monitoring and advisory has become an important component for area wise implementation of IPM at state and national level. The programme has been successfully implemented in Odisha during 2010 and 2011 under RKVY. Implementation of the programme had resulted successful management of swarming caterpillar in 13 rice growing districts of Odisha during kharif 2010 and 2011.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM increased rice grain yield by 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, Uttar Pradesh over farmers practice.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1e1
Treatment
Implementation of the technologye1
Outcome
rice grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
21.6%e1
Comparator
farmer's practices (FP)e1
Setting
Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradeshe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Implementation of the technology resulted in increase in rice grain yield i.e., 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradesh 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur in Haryana, 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand, 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana and 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmer's practices (FP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM increased rice grain yield by 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur, Haryana over farmers practice.

Material
Taraori Basmatie1
Treatment
Implementation of the technologye1
Outcome
rice grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
21.5%e1
Comparator
farmer's practices (FP)e1
Setting
Chhajpur in Haryanae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Implementation of the technology resulted in increase in rice grain yield i.e., 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradesh 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur in Haryana, 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand, 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana and 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmer's practices (FP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM increased rice grain yield by 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand over farmers practice.

Material
Type 3e1
Treatment
Implementation of the technologye1
Outcome
rice grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
19.5%e1
Comparator
farmer's practices (FP)e1
Setting
Uttarakhande1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Implementation of the technology resulted in increase in rice grain yield i.e., 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradesh 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur in Haryana, 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand, 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana and 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmer's practices (FP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM increased rice grain yield by 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana over farmers practice.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e1
Treatment
Implementation of the technologye1
Outcome
rice grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
14.5 to 22.7%e1
Comparator
farmer's practices (FP)e1
Setting
Haryanae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Implementation of the technology resulted in increase in rice grain yield i.e., 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradesh 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur in Haryana, 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand, 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana and 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmer's practices (FP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM increased rice grain yield by 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmers practice.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e1
Treatment
Implementation of the technologye1
Outcome
rice grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
38.2%e1
Comparator
farmer's practices (FP)e1
Setting
Uttar Pradeshe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“Implementation of the technology resulted in increase in rice grain yield i.e., 21.6% in Pusa Basmati 1 at Shikohpur, in Uttar Pradesh 21.5% in Taraori Basmati at Chhajpur in Haryana, 19.5% in Type 3 in Uttarakhand, 14.5 to 22.7% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Haryana and 38.2% in Pusa Basmati 1121 in Uttar Pradesh over farmer's practices (FP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–895 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM increased yield by 47.1% in the non-basmati rice variety Pooja at Sigmapur, Odisha over farmers practice.

Material
Poojae3
Treatment
IPMe3
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
enhancemente2
Value
47.1%e2
Comparator
FPe2
Setting
Sigmapur (Cuttack, Odisha)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“The trial resulted in an enhancement of 47.1% yield and 26.47 % B-C ratio over FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1565 · show in text ↑
e3

“developed and validated IPM module at Sigmapur (Cuttack, Odisha) non-Basmati rice variety Pooja”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM gave a higher Benefit-Cost ratio than farmers practice in all basmati rice trials.

Treatment
IPMe4
Outcome
Benefit - Cost (B-C) ratioe4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
FPe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e4

“In all the basmati rice trials, higher yield as well as Benefit - Cost (B-C) ratio was obtained in IPM as compared to FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Implementation of IPM significantly reduced the use of chemical pesticides in rice.

Treatment
Implementation of IPMe5
Outcome
uses of chemical pesticidese5
Direction
reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e5

“Implementation of IPM led to significant reduction in uses of chemical pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Pusa Basmati 1121 at Bambawad, IPM used fewer chemical pesticide applications in amount (103.2 g a.i./ha) than farmers practice.

Material
Pusa Basmati 1121e6
Treatment
IPMe6
Outcome
application of chemical pesticidese6
Direction
lowerinferrede6
Value
103.2 g a.i./hae6
Qualifier
1214.4 g a.i./hae6
Comparator
FPe6
Setting
Bambawad, Uttar Pradeshe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“In case of IPM, only 1.46 application of chemical pesticides (103.2 g a.i./ha) were undertaken in Pusa Basmati 1121 against 2.8 application in FP (1214.4 g a.i./ha) at Bambawad, Uttar Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM yielded 5600 kg/ha of rice against 4900 kg/ha under farmers practice in an on-farm trial in Odisha.

Treatment
IPMe7
Outcome
Rice yielde7
Direction
higherinferrede7
Value
5600 kg ha-1e7
Comparator
FPe7
Setting
at Nagapur and Basudeipur villages in Khurda district of Odishae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e0

“at Nagapur and Basudeipur villages in Khurda district of Odisha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1787–1850 · show in text ↑
e7

“Rice yield was recorded 5600 kg ha-1 in IPM as against 4900 kg ha-1 in FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM reduced the incidence of insect pests and diseases compared with farmers practice in an on-farm trial.

Treatment
IPMe1
Interactor
insect pestse1pest
Outcome
incidence of insect pests and diseasese1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
FPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“On-Farm trial on validation of IPM module in non-Basmati rice (Pooja variety) under semi deep water conditions conducted in 10 ha during rabi 2017 at Nagapur and Basudeipur villages in Khurda district of Odisha resulted in reduction in the incidence of insect pests and diseases with higher population of natural enemies as compared to FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM gave a higher population of natural enemies than farmers practice in an on-farm trial.

Treatment
IPMe1
Interactor
natural enemiese1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population of natural enemiese1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
FPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“On-Farm trial on validation of IPM module in non-Basmati rice (Pooja variety) under semi deep water conditions conducted in 10 ha during rabi 2017 at Nagapur and Basudeipur villages in Khurda district of Odisha resulted in reduction in the incidence of insect pests and diseases with higher population of natural enemies as compared to FP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The e-pest monitoring programme achieved successful management of swarming caterpillar in 13 rice growing districts of Odisha in kharif 2010 and 2011.

Interactor
swarming caterpillare2pest
Outcome
successful management of swarming caterpillare2
Setting
13 rice growing districts of Odishae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice pest management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“successful management of swarming caterpillar in 13 rice growing districts of Odisha during kharif 2010 and 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2341–2453 · show in text ↑

ipm · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ipm · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

ipm · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

ipm · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

43 papers: 43 positive, 0 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.