Paper · 2020 · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity

Abundance of soil microbes, endophytic fungi and blast disease of paddy rice with three pest management practices

Suryo Wiyono; Bonjok Istiaji; Hermanu Triwidodo; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract. Wiyono S, Istiaji B, Triwidodo H, Suryaningsih AS. 2020. Abundance of soil microbes, endophytic fungi and blast disease of paddy rice with three pest management practices. Biodiversitas 21: 4234-4239. Rice production in Indonesia faces a potential threat of pests and diseases. Biointensive Integrated Pest Management (Bio IPM) is a new approach based on natural and biological control, which effectively controls pests and diseases. However, the impact of this technology on soil microbes and endophytic fungi is almost unknown. The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of Bio IPM on abundance of soil microbes, endophytic fungi, and blast disease under field conditions. Three pest management types were tested i.e. conventional, reduced pesticides, and Bio IPM. Field experiment was set in four replications in randomized complete block design. Experiments were carried out in two seasons i.e. dry and wet season. Variables assessed during experiment were amount of soil bacteria, soil fungi, phosphate solubilizing bacteria, colonization of total leaf endophytes, colonization of Nigrospora sp., and blast disease severity. The results showed that the abundance of soil bacteria and phosphate solubilizing bacteria were significantly increased with Bio IPM whereas it was not found to be significant in soil fungi. Total endophytic fungi and Nigrospora sp. were found higher in Bio IPM especially in early growth stages. Bio IPM controlled neck blast more effectively than conventional and reduced pesticides, but it did not show any significant effect on leaf blast disease.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio IPM significantly increased soil bacterial abundance.

Taxon
paddy ricet0
Treatment
Bio IPMe0
Outcome
abundance of soil bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the abundance of soil bacteria and phosphate solubilizing bacteria were significantly increased with Bio IPM whereas it was not found to be significant in soil fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio IPM significantly increased phosphate solubilizing bacteria.

Taxon
paddy ricet0
Treatment
Bio IPMe0
Outcome
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the abundance of soil bacteria and phosphate solubilizing bacteria were significantly increased with Bio IPM whereas it was not found to be significant in soil fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1344 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total endophytic fungi were higher under Bio IPM, especially at early growth stages.

Taxon
paddy ricet0
Treatment
Bio IPMe0
Outcome
Total endophytic fungie0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
especially in early growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total endophytic fungi and Nigrospora sp. were found higher in Bio IPM especially in early growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nigrospora sp. was higher under Bio IPM, especially at early growth stages.

Taxon
paddy ricet0
Treatment
Bio IPMe0
Interactor
Nigrospora sp.Nigrosporae0symbiont
Outcome
Nigrospora sp.e0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
especially in early growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total endophytic fungi and Nigrospora sp. were found higher in Bio IPM especially in early growth stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio IPM controlled neck blast more effectively than conventional and reduced pesticide management.

Taxon
paddy ricet0
Treatment
Bio IPMe0
Outcome
neck blaste0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Comparator
conventional and reduced pesticidese0

Verbatim

e0

“Bio IPM controlled neck blast more effectively than conventional and reduced pesticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1538 · show in text ↑
t0

“paddy rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–76 · show in text ↑

ipm · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ipm · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

ipm · disease · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

ipm · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.