Paper · 2019 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Maize production constraints, traits preference and currentStrigacontrol options in western Tanzania: farmers’ consultation and implications for breeding

John Lobulu; Hussein Shimelis; Mark Laing; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Striga spp. severely affect maize yields in Tanzania causing yield losses varying from 20% to 100%. The use of Striga resistant varieties is an economical and environmentally friendly option that can be easily adopted by smallholder farmers. Uptake of newly developed varieties would be high if the breeding process is inclusive and consultative to farmer preferred traits and preferences. The aim of this study was to identify farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options, trait preference and perceptions among smallholder farmers in western Tanzania. Surveys were conducted in four districts, namely Igunga, Shinyanga rural, Urambo and Uyui during the 2017/2018 cropping season. Data were collected from 324 farmers using a semi-structured questionnaire (166), focus group discussions (158) and field observations. The major maize production constraints reported by farmers were; drought (97.2%), Striga infestation (93.1%), insect pests in field (90.1%) and in stores (72.7%). The main Striga control options described by farmers across the studied districts were: hoe weeding, uprooting, manure application and crop rotation in descending order. Only 59% of the farmers used the seed of improved maize varieties of either hybrids or open-pollinated varieties (OPV) which are Striga susceptible and the remaining used home saved seed. A breeding programme aiming at improving maize varieties for Striga resistance, including farmers’ preferred traits, should be designed and executed to control Striga infestations thus improving maize production, productivity and profitability in western Tanzania.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers reported drought as a maize production constraint at 97.2%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
droughte0
Value
97.2%e0
Setting
western Tanzaniae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought (97.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–923 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–497 · show in text ↑
e2

“smallholder farmers in western Tanzania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers reported Striga infestation as a maize production constraint at 93.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
StrigaStrigae0weed
Outcome
Striga infestatione0
Value
93.1%e0
Setting
western Tanzaniae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga
Striga · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Striga infestation (93.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–951 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–497 · show in text ↑
e2

“smallholder farmers in western Tanzania”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–577 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers reported field insect pests as a maize production constraint at 90.1%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
insect pests in fielde0
Value
90.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insect pests in field (90.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–982 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmers reported insect pests in stores as a maize production constraint at 72.7%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Interactor
insect pestse1pest
Outcome
in storese0
Value
72.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in stores (72.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect pests in field (90.1%) and in stores (72.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1004 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reported Striga control options were hoe weeding, uprooting and manure application in descending order.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
StrigaStrigae0weed
Outcome
hoe weeding, uprooting, manure applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga
Striga · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Striga control options described by farmers across the studied districts were: hoe weeding, uprooting, manure application and crop rotation in descending order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation was the fourth reported Striga control option.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
StrigaStrigae0weed
Outcome
crop rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga
Striga · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Striga control options described by farmers across the studied districts were: hoe weeding, uprooting, manure application and crop rotation in descending order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmers’ maize production constraints, current Striga control options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 59% of farmers used improved maize variety seed, comprising hybrids or open pollinated varieties that were Striga susceptible.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
StrigaStrigae0weed
Outcome
used the seed of improved maize varietiese0
Value
59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga
Striga · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 59% of the farmers used the seed of improved maize varieties of either hybrids or open-pollinated varieties (OPV) which are Striga susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1323 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining farmers used home saved maize seed.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
used home saved seede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remaining used home saved seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1362 · show in text ↑
e1

“improved maize varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1241 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend breeding Striga resistant maize with farmer preferred traits to improve production, productivity and profitability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
StrigaStrigae0weed
Outcome
A breeding programme aiming at improving maize varieties for Striga resistance, including farmers’ preferred traitse0
Setting
western Tanzaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Striga
Striga · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Marco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A breeding programme aiming at improving maize varieties for Striga resistance, including farmers’ preferred traits, should be designed and executed to control Striga infestations thus improving maize production, productivity and profitability in western Tanzania.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1628 · show in text ↑