Paper · 2019 · Figshare

Application of biological activators and organic fertilizers in a pot experiment with marigold (Calendula officinalis L.).

Dimka Ivanova; Zdravka Petkova

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was carried out in 2016-2017 with the medicinal plant Calendula officinalis L. on different soil types - Leached Vertisol from the region of Bozhurishte and Fluvisol from the region of Tsalapitsa. This study investigated the effects of soil improvers in comparison to the traditionally used manure. The combination of soil and foliar fertilization ensures optimal plant nutrition and high quality of the biologically active substances of marigold. So, it is shown that the examined new organic fertilizers (Humipromoter and Biopromoter) in combination with 2 types of foliar bio stimulators liquid fertilizers containing amino acids (Aminosol and Amminostim bio) give a positive effect to plant growth. The ANOVA analysis for yield of biomass (g/pot) indicates that the influence of soil factors and different fertilization treatments is statistically significant at a variation level P <0.1%. Data variation due to different soil type is 44.9%, and for different types of fertilizers – 21.8%. The yields obtained from the soil type Leached Vertisols are nearly twice as high as those of the Fluvisols, as the differences are proved at P <0.5%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar fertilization supported optimal nutrition and high quality active substances.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
combination of soil and foliar fertilizatione0
Outcome
optimal plant nutrition and high quality of the biologically active substancese0
Direction
optimale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combination of soil and foliar fertilization ensures optimal plant nutrition and high quality of the biologically active substances of marigold.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humipromoter combined with the foliar fertilizers had a positive effect on plant growth.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
Humipromotere0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
Aminosol and Amminostim bioe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“the examined new organic fertilizers (Humipromoter and Biopromoter) in combination with 2 types of foliar bio stimulators liquid fertilizers containing amino acids (Aminosol and Amminostim bio) give a positive effect to plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–719 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biopromoter combined with the foliar fertilizers had a positive effect on plant growth.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
Biopromotere0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
positive effecte0
Qualifier
Aminosol and Amminostim bioe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“the examined new organic fertilizers (Humipromoter and Biopromoter) in combination with 2 types of foliar bio stimulators liquid fertilizers containing amino acids (Aminosol and Amminostim bio) give a positive effect to plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil factors significantly influenced biomass yield.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
yield of biomasse0
Setting
soil factorse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ANOVA analysis for yield of biomass (g/pot) indicates that the influence of soil factors and different fertilization treatments is statistically significant at a variation level P <0.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatments significantly influenced biomass yield.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
different fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
yield of biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The ANOVA analysis for yield of biomass (g/pot) indicates that the influence of soil factors and different fertilization treatments is statistically significant at a variation level P <0.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–910 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil type accounted for 44.9% of data variation.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
Data variatione0
Value
44.9%e0
Setting
different soil typee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Data variation due to different soil type is 44.9%, and for different types of fertilizers – 21.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1010 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer type accounted for 21.8% of data variation.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Treatment
different types of fertilizerse0
Outcome
Data variatione0
Value
21.8%e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Data variation due to different soil type is 44.9%, and for different types of fertilizers – 21.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1010 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leached Vertisol yielded nearly twice as much as Fluvisol.

Taxon
marigoldt0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highe0
Value
nearly twicee0
Comparator
Fluvisolse0
Setting
Leached Vertisolse0

Verbatim

t0

“marigold (Calendula officinalis L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The yields obtained from the soil type Leached Vertisols are nearly twice as high as those of the Fluvisols, as the differences are proved at P <0.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1161 · show in text ↑

application · quality: general · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Tagetes (marigolds)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.