Paper · 2000 · Western Journal of Applied Forestry

The Influence of Weeding on Growth of Browsed Seedlings in Douglas-Fir Plantations

M. E. O'Dea; M. Newton; E. C. Cole; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Large Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) transplants were exposed to heavy browsing pressure under various weeding regimes in two experiments continued 4 and 5 yr, respectively. Browsing had relatively little effect on seedlings that did not receive weed control because potential growth was modest. With increasing degrees of weed control, seedlings that escaped browsing grew more rapidly. Weeding facilitated escapement from reach of browsing and increased net growth significantly because of both escapement and increased rates of recovery after herbivory. When subjected to repeated browsing, seedlings were similar in size in plots weeded both the first year and for 2 yr. Seedlings in plots weeded at both levels were larger than those in unweeded plots. Intensive weeding after planting appears to be a useful and integrative method of protecting seedlings from browsing losses. West. J. Appl. For. 15(3):163-168.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Browsing had little effect on seedlings without weed control.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
Browsinge0
Outcome
relatively little effecte0
Qualifier
did not receive weed controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Browsing had relatively little effect on seedlings that did not receive weed control because potential growth was modest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unbrowsed seedlings grew faster with increasing weed control.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
weed controle0
Outcome
seedlings that escaped browsing grew more rapidlye0
Direction
more rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing degrees of weed control, seedlings that escaped browsing grew more rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding enabled seedlings to grow beyond browsing reach.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
Weedinge0
Outcome
escapement from reach of browsinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeding facilitated escapement from reach of browsing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding significantly increased net growth through escape and recovery after herbivory.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
Weedinge0
Outcome
net growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeding facilitated escapement from reach of browsing and increased net growth significantly because of both escapement and increased rates of recovery after herbivory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under repeated browsing, seedlings weeded for one year and two years had similar size.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
weeded both the first yeare0
Outcome
sizee0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
for 2 yre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When subjected to repeated browsing, seedlings were similar in size in plots weeded both the first year and for 2 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings at both weeding levels were larger than those in unweeded plots.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
weeded at both levelse0
Outcome
Seedlingse0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
unweeded plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in plots weeded at both levels were larger than those in unweeded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend intensive postplanting weeding to protect seedlings from browsing losses.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Outcome
Intensive weeding after plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive weeding after planting appears to be a useful and integrative method of protecting seedlings from browsing losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-Fir”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–70 · show in text ↑

herbicide · growth · Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.