Paper · 2019 · Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology

Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)

A.K. Akintokun; C.O. Ojesola; P.O. Akintokun; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Tomato is affected by a lot of diseases including bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum (Rs), resulting in fruit yield loss. Chemical control of this disease is not advisable because of hazardous effects on human and environment, hence, the need to use biocontrol agents such as Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). This study investigated the potential of Bt in the control of Rs under screenhouse condition. Six treatments with three replications in completely randomized design were carried out. Agronomic parameters were measured and data collected were analyzed using one - way analysis of variance. Means were then separated using Duncan's Multiple Range Test at p ≤ 0.05. Inoculation of Bt and Rs simultaneously significantly suppressed the incidence of bacterial wilt and promoted plant growth. Higher plant heights (72.70 - 111.00 cm), stem girth (1.63 - 1.90 cm) and number of leaves (103.33 - 125.33) were recorded for plants inoculated with Bt at 9th week after planting compared to plants inoculated with Rs alone. Highest disease incidence was recorded in plants inoculated with Rs alone (100 %), while plants inoculated with Bt had the highest disease reduction (67%). This study revealed that Bt may be used in the control of bacterial wilt of tomato.Keywords: Bacillus thuringiensis, screenhouse, Bacterial wilt, Ralstonia solanacearum, Tomato

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous Bt and Rs inoculation suppressed bacterial wilt incidence in tomato.

Treatment
Inoculation of Bt and Rs simultaneouslye0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of bacterial wilte0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Bt and Rs simultaneously significantly suppressed the incidence of bacterial wilt and promoted plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous Bt and Rs inoculation promoted tomato growth.

Treatment
Inoculation of Bt and Rs simultaneouslye0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Bt and Rs simultaneously significantly suppressed the incidence of bacterial wilt and promoted plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt inoculation produced taller tomato plants than Rs alone at week 9.

Treatment
inoculated with Bte0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant heightse0
Direction
Highere0
Value
72.70 - 111.00 cme0
Qualifier
9th week after plantinge0
Comparator
plants inoculated with Rs alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant heights (72.70 - 111.00 cm), stem girth (1.63 - 1.90 cm) and number of leaves (103.33 - 125.33) were recorded for plants inoculated with Bt at 9th week after planting compared to plants inoculated with Rs alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt inoculation produced greater tomato stem girth than Rs alone at week 9.

Treatment
inoculated with Bte0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem girthe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
1.63 - 1.90 cme0
Qualifier
9th week after plantinge0
Comparator
plants inoculated with Rs alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant heights (72.70 - 111.00 cm), stem girth (1.63 - 1.90 cm) and number of leaves (103.33 - 125.33) were recorded for plants inoculated with Bt at 9th week after planting compared to plants inoculated with Rs alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt inoculation produced more tomato leaves than Rs alone at week 9.

Treatment
inoculated with Bte0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Second interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
Highere0
Value
103.33 - 125.33e0
Qualifier
9th week after plantinge0
Comparator
plants inoculated with Rs alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher plant heights (72.70 - 111.00 cm), stem girth (1.63 - 1.90 cm) and number of leaves (103.33 - 125.33) were recorded for plants inoculated with Bt at 9th week after planting compared to plants inoculated with Rs alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rs alone had 100% disease incidence in tomato.

Treatment
inoculated with Rs alonee0
Interactor
Rse0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
100 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest disease incidence was recorded in plants inoculated with Rs alone (100 %), while plants inoculated with Bt had the highest disease reduction (67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt inoculation had the highest tomato disease reduction at 67%.

Treatment
inoculated with Bte0
Interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease reductione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest disease incidence was recorded in plants inoculated with Rs alone (100 %), while plants inoculated with Bt had the highest disease reduction (67%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose Bt for control of tomato bacterial wilt.

Interactor
Bte0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control of bacterial wilte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study revealed that Bt may be used in the control of bacterial wilt of tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Antagonistic effect of Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of bacterial wilt of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–120 · show in text ↑

inoculation · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

transgenic · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

transgenic · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 16 positive, 11 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.