Abstract
In this study, okra was dried and modelled with using five different drying methods exist in literature. In the methods of vacuum and hot air drying, the drying temperature of 50C was selected, while the powers of microwave and infrared were set as 90 W and 83 W, respectively. The results were evaluated in terms of drying time, product color quality, energy consumption and rehydration. The minimum drying time was obtained by microwave drying method. Also, the energy efficiency increased with the microwave drying method. In terms of color criteria the best value was obtained by the hot-air drying method. Rehydration content of dried okra samples with hot air was higher than that of other drying methods. From the results of this study, the most efficient drying methods were determined as microwave and hot-air drying.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Microwave drying gave the shortest drying time for okra.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- microwave drying methode0
- Outcome
- drying timee0
- Direction
- minimume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The minimum drying time was obtained by microwave drying method.”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Microwave drying increased drying energy efficiency.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- microwave drying methode0
- Outcome
- energy efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the energy efficiency increased with the microwave drying method”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot-air drying gave the best color criterion for okra.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- hot-air drying methode0
- Outcome
- color criteriae0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In terms of color criteria the best value was obtained by the hot-air drying method”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot-air dried okra had higher rehydration content than samples dried by other methods.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- hot aire0
- Outcome
- Rehydration contente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other drying methodse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rehydration content of dried okra samples with hot air was higher than that of other drying methods”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors identified microwave and hot-air drying as the most efficient methods.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Outcome
- microwave and hot-air dryinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the most efficient drying methods were determined as microwave and hot-air drying”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
processing · quality: postharvest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.