Abstract
Several fruit characteristics were determined along with the total phenolic content (TP) and total antioxidant capacities (TAC) of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions previously selected from the Mediterranean region of Turkey and grown in Mut, Mersin, Turkey. Five cultivars (‘Can2’, ‘Cin’, ‘Havran’, ‘Ozark Premier’ and ‘Papaz’) from the same orchard were also included in this study. TP and TAC were determined by ferric reducing ability (FRAP) and trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assays. The accessions were found to be significantly different for all the characters tested. TP ranged between 136.8 (‘Ozark Premier’) and 583.1 (Selection No. 3) Gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/kg fresh weight (fw) while FRAP and TEAC measurements of TAC ranged between 0.123 (Selection 33C 02) and 0.127 (Selection 31C 18) to 0.835 (‘Can 2’) and 0.420 (Selection No. 8)mmolTE/kgfw. The correlation analysis indicated that TP was significantly correlated with L and hue° values of color measurements. While FRAP was found to be correlated with pH, no significant correlation was detected with TEAC. A notable variation among the green-fleshed P. cerasifera accessions was reported for TP and TAC and, P. cerasifera had comparable TP to other plum species while it did not have a good antioxidant activity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
The P. cerasifera accessions differed significantly for all characters tested.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasifera
Prunus cerasiferae0 - Outcome
- characters testede1
- Qualifier
- significantly differente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e1“The accessions were found to be significantly different for all the characters tested”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum total phenolic content was 583.1 GAE/kg fresh weight, in Selection No. 3.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- total phenolic contente0
- Value
- 583.1 (Selection No. 3) Gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/kg fresh weight (fw)e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total phenolic content (TP) and total antioxidant capacities (TAC) of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e3“583.1 (Selection No. 3) Gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/kg fresh weight (fw)”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimum total phenolic content was 136.8 GAE/kg fresh weight, in Ozark Premier.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- TPe2
- Value
- 136.8e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e2“TP ranged between 136.8”
Claim · model-written summary
Total antioxidant capacity by FRAP and TEAC had a minimum of 0.123 mmol TE/kg fresh weight.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- TACe4
- Value
- 0.123e4
- Qualifier
- FRAP and TEAC measurementse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e4“FRAP and TEAC measurements of TAC ranged between 0.123”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum total antioxidant capacity reached 0.835 mmol TE/kg fresh weight.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- TACe0
- Value
- 0.835e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“total phenolic content (TP) and total antioxidant capacities (TAC) of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e5“to 0.835”
Claim · model-written summary
Total phenolic content was significantly correlated with the L and hue values of color measurements.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- TPe6
- Direction
- significantly correlatede6
- Comparator
- color measurementse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e6“TP was significantly correlated with L and hue° values of color measurements”
Claim · model-written summary
FRAP was correlated with pH.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- FRAPe7
- Direction
- correlatede7
- Comparator
- pHe7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e7“While FRAP was found to be correlated with pH”
Claim · model-written summary
TEAC showed no significant correlation with FRAP.
- Taxon
- Prunus cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae0
- Outcome
- TEACe2
- Direction
- no significant correlatione2
- Comparator
- FRAPe1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e1“While FRAP was found to be correlated with pH”
e2“no significant correlation was detected with TEAC”
Claim · model-written summary
Green-fleshed P. cerasifera accessions showed notable variation in TP and TAC.
- Taxon
- P. cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae1
- Outcome
- variatione1
- Qualifier
- green-fleshede1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“of eighteen Prunus cerasifera accessions”
e1“A notable variation among the green-fleshed P. cerasifera accessions was reported for TP and TAC”
Claim · model-written summary
P. cerasifera had total phenolic content comparable to other plum species.
- Taxon
- P. cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae1
- Outcome
- TPe1
- Direction
- comparablee1
- Comparator
- other plum speciese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“P. cerasifera had comparable TP to other plum species while it did not have a good antioxidant activity”
Claim · model-written summary
P. cerasifera did not have a good antioxidant activity.
- Taxon
- P. cerasiferaPrunus cerasiferae1
- Outcome
- antioxidant activitye1
- Qualifier
- did not have a goode1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“P. cerasifera had comparable TP to other plum species while it did not have a good antioxidant activity”