Paper · 2019 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Aerated Irrigation Promotes Soil Respiration and Microorganism Abundance around Tomato Rhizosphere

Yan Zhu; Huanjie Cai; Libing Song; et al.

19
claims
44
verbatim quotes
45
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Aerated irrigation improved soil aeration, increasing oxygen concentration and air‐filled porosity. Aerated irrigation enhanced soil, microbial, and root respiration and microbe abundance. Soil oxygen, air‐filled porosity correlated with respiration, microbe abundance. Aerated irrigation has economic benefits, promoting fruit yield and IWUE. Aerated irrigation (AI), by which aerated water is supplied to soil through subsurface drip irrigation (SDI), has shown high yield potential and application prospects. This study evaluated the impact of AI on soil aeration, respiration components, and microorganism abundance to determine the relationships between these parameters. Four treatments (W1AI, W2AI, W1CK, and W2CK) combining AI and nonaerated SDI (CK) and two irrigation levels (W1 and W2, with crop‐pan coefficients of 0.6 and 1.0) were conducted in a greenhouse during two tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) growing seasons in April to July in 2015 and 2016. The results showed that AI improved soil aeration conditions, with soil oxygen concentration and air‐filled porosity significantly increasing by 5.86 and 5.16%, respectively, compared with CK. The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK, and W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK. Moreover, the abundance of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi with W2AI significantly increased by 26.9, 27.1, and 24.8%, respectively, compared with W1AI. Soil oxygen concentration (under controlled soil temperature) and air‐filled porosity positively correlated with soil respiration and microorganism abundance. Mean fruit yield with AI was 22.4% higher than CK. Aerated irrigation therefore stimulated soil respiration and microbial proliferation by improving soil aeration conditions. Enhanced soil aeration, respiration, and microorganism abundance under AI provide economic benefit by improving fruit yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerated irrigation increased soil oxygen concentration relative to CK.

Treatment
AIe0
Outcome
soil oxygen concentratione0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
5.86e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil oxygen concentration and air‐filled porosity significantly increasing by 5.86 and 5.16%, respectively, compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerated irrigation increased air‐filled porosity relative to CK.

Treatment
AIe0
Outcome
air‐filled porositye0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
5.16%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil oxygen concentration and air‐filled porosity significantly increasing by 5.86 and 5.16%, respectively, compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W1AI increased soil respiration relative to W1CK.

Treatment
W1AIe0
Outcome
soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.8e0
Comparator
W1CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W1AI increased microbial respiration relative to W1CK.

Treatment
W1AIe0
Outcome
microbiale0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.0e0
Comparator
W1CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W1AI increased root respiration relative to W1CK.

Treatment
W1AIe0
Outcome
root respiratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23.4e0
Comparator
W1CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W1AI increased bacteria abundance relative to W1CK.

Treatment
W1AIe0
Outcome
bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.1e0
Comparator
W1CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W1AI increased actinomycetes abundance relative to W1CK.

Treatment
W1AIe0
Outcome
actinomycetese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.4e0
Comparator
W1CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W1AI increased fungi abundance relative to W1CK.

Treatment
W1AIe0
Outcome
fungi abundancee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.1%e0
Comparator
W1CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased soil respiration relative to W2CK.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
soile1
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.2e0
Comparator
W2CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased microbial respiration relative to W2CK.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
microbiale1
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.3e0
Comparator
W2CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased root respiration relative to W2CK.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
root respiratione1
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.7e0
Comparator
W2CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased bacteria abundance relative to W2CK.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
bacteriae1
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.2e0
Comparator
W2CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased actinomycetes abundance relative to W2CK.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
actinomycetese1
Direction
increasede0
Value
39.3e0
Comparator
W2CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased fungi abundance relative to W2CK.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
fungi abundancee1
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.1%e0
Comparator
W2CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“W2AI significantly increased these by 24.2, 15.3, 28.7, 39.2, 39.3, and 37.1%, respectively, compared with W2CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1493 · show in text ↑
e1

“The W1AI treatment increased soil, microbial, and root respiration as well as bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi abundance by 18.8, 10.0, 23.4, 30.1, 29.4, and 30.1%, respectively, compared with W1CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased bacteria abundance relative to W1AI.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
abundance of bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.9e0
Comparator
W1AIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the abundance of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi with W2AI significantly increased by 26.9, 27.1, and 24.8%, respectively, compared with W1AI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased actinomycetes abundance relative to W1AI.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
actinomycetese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.1e0
Comparator
W1AIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the abundance of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi with W2AI significantly increased by 26.9, 27.1, and 24.8%, respectively, compared with W1AI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

W2AI increased fungi abundance relative to W1AI.

Treatment
W2AIe0
Outcome
fungie0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.8%e0
Comparator
W1AIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the abundance of bacteria, actinomycetes, and fungi with W2AI significantly increased by 26.9, 27.1, and 24.8%, respectively, compared with W1AI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil oxygen concentration and air filled porosity were positively correlated with soil respiration and microorganism abundance.

Outcome
soil respiration and microorganism abundancee0
Direction
positivelye0
Setting
under controlled soil temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil oxygen concentration (under controlled soil temperature) and air‐filled porosity positively correlated with soil respiration and microorganism abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1651–1808 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerated irrigation increased mean fruit yield by 22.4% relative to CK.

Treatment
AIe0
Outcome
Mean fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
22.4%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean fruit yield with AI was 22.4% higher than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1859 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–86 · show in text ↑

irrigation · soil: physics · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 33 positive, 18 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

238 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.