Paper · 2019 · AIMS Agriculture and Food

Management of two irrigation systems and Algae Foliar application on wheat plant growth

Mansour Hani A; Osama A. Nofal; Maybelle S. Gaballah; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the light of crop shortage production, water scarcity and environmental pollution. The utilization of biofertilizers as an algae extract and modern irrigation systems has become paramount important to reduce the chemical fertilizers and ensure good distribution for plants. Therefore, two field experiments were conducted in the Nubaria district at the Agricultural Station of the National Research Centre, El-Behira Governorate within the two winter seasons 2015/2016 & 2016/2017 to demonstrate the influence of two irrigation systems, i.e., drip and sprinkler and two rates of algae extract foliar application i.e., 0 g/L and 1.5 g/L on growth parameters and spike characteristics of two wheat varieties i.e., Gemiza-9 and Misr-1 grown in sandy soil. Results indicated that irrigation systems were significant effective on all characters except leaf area, plant height and spike length. On the other hand, all growth parameters and weight of spike of the two wheat varieties showed significantly differences under the studied treatments. The results clarified that some tested characters of Gemiza-9 variety were considerably improved. However, the Misr-1 variety surpassed Gemiza-9 in all characters in both seasons. While the algae foliar extract was significantly effective on all characters of study. The rate of 1.5 g/L of algae extract gave the highest values of all the studied parameters. Respecting to the first and second order interacted of factors under study effect on such parameters; the results showed that there were many parameters that improved significantly. According to the results of this study, it could be concluded that the combined treatments of foliar spray with 1.5 g/L of algae extract and two wheat varieties under two irrigation systems were found to be highly effective in improving wheat growth in sandy soil condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation system significantly affected measured wheat characters other than leaf area, height and spike length.

Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
all characterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation systems were significant effective on all characters except leaf area, plant height and spike length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation system did not significantly affect wheat leaf area, plant height or spike length.

Treatment
irrigation systemse0
Outcome
leaf area, plant height and spike lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation systems were significant effective on all characters except leaf area, plant height and spike length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Studied treatments significantly differentiated growth parameters and spike weight between the wheat varieties.

Treatment
studied treatmentse0
Outcome
all growth parameters and weight of spikee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all growth parameters and weight of spike of the two wheat varieties showed significantly differences under the studied treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some tested characters of Gemiza-9 improved.

Material
Gemiza-9e0
Outcome
some tested characterse0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some tested characters of Gemiza-9 variety were considerably improved.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr-1 surpassed Gemiza-9 in all measured characters in both seasons.

Material
Misr-1e0
Outcome
all characterse0
Direction
surpassede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
Gemiza-9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Misr-1 variety surpassed Gemiza-9 in all characters in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Algae foliar extract significantly affected all studied wheat characters.

Treatment
algae foliar extracte0
Outcome
all characters of studye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the algae foliar extract was significantly effective on all characters of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1.5 g/L algae extract rate gave the highest values across studied wheat parameters.

Treatment
1.5 g/L of algae extracte0
Outcome
all the studied parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of 1.5 g/L of algae extract gave the highest values of all the studied parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions among studied factors significantly improved many wheat parameters.

Outcome
many parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
significantlye0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were many parameters that improved significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.