Paper · 2018 · Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor

Response of Some Egyptian Cotton Cultivars to Foliar Spray by Some Microelements

El-Saeed El-Gedwy

17
claims
37
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted on the Farm of Agricultural Research and Experiment Center, Faculty of Agriculture Moshtohor, Benha University, Toukh Directorate, Kalubia Governorate, Egypt, during the two successive seasons of 2015 and 2016 to study the effect of foliar spray by eight micronutrient treatments, i.e. without application (control), Zn, Mn, Fe, Zn + Mn, Zn + Fe, Mn + Fe and Zn + Mn + Fe on growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber quality properties for the two Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.) verities, i.e. Giza 86 and Giza 88. The experimental design was split plot design in four replications. The obvious results of this investigation can be summarized as follows: Significant differences were detected for all growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber properties of cotton among the two Egyptian cotton cultivars during 2015 and 2016 seasons. Giza 86 cultivar significantly surpassed Giza 88 cultivar and gave the greatest mean values of plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, boll weight, lint %, lint cotton yield/plant, seed index, seed cotton yield/fed, lint cotton yield/fed, fiber elongation %, micronaire value, fiber maturity ratio and fiber reflectance in the both seasons. While, Giza 88 recorded the highest mean values of upper half mean length, length uniformity index, fiber strength and fiber yellowness degree in the two seasons. Data revealed that the differences between the studied eight microelements treatments on growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber properties of cotton during 2015 and 2016 seasons were significant except, fiber reflectance and fiber yellowness degree were not significant. The application of combined of Zn + Mn + Fe treatment gave significantly the greatest mean values of plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, boll weight, lint %, lint cotton yield/plant, seed index, seed cotton yield/fed, lint cotton yield/fed, upper half mean length, length uniformity index, fiber strength, fiber elongation %, micronaire value and fiber maturity ratio in the both seasons. Planting Giza 86 which foliar spray by mixed Zn + Mn + Fe treatment significantly recorded the highest mean values of No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, boll weight, lint cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint cotton yield/fed and fiber maturity ratio in the first and second seasons. Meanwhile, planting Giza 88 under the same micronutrients application surpassed the other combinations in upper half mean length, length uniformity index and fiber strength during the both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two cotton cultivars differed significantly in growth, yield and fiber properties across both seasons.

Outcome
growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber propertiese0
Qualifier
2015 and 2016 seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences were detected for all growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber properties of cotton among the two Egyptian cotton cultivars during 2015 and 2016 seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 surpassed Giza 88 for plant height, sympodial branches and open bolls.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 86e0
Outcome
plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plante0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
Giza 88e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 86 cultivar significantly surpassed Giza 88 cultivar and gave the greatest mean values of plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 surpassed Giza 88 for seed cotton yield per plant, boll weight and lint percentage.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 86e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield/plant, boll weight, lint %e0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
Giza 88e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 86 cultivar significantly surpassed Giza 88 cultivar and gave the greatest mean values of plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, boll weight, lint %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1114 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 surpassed Giza 88 for lint yield per feddan, elongation and micronaire.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Material
Giza 86e1
Outcome
lint cotton yield/fed, fiber elongation %, micronaire valuee0
Direction
greateste1
Comparator
Giza 88e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint cotton yield/fed, fiber elongation %, micronaire value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“Giza 86 cultivar significantly surpassed Giza 88 cultivar and gave the greatest mean values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 surpassed Giza 88 for fiber maturity and reflectance.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Material
Giza 86e1
Outcome
fiber maturity ratio and fiber reflectancee0
Direction
greateste1
Comparator
Giza 88e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fiber maturity ratio and fiber reflectance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1279 · show in text ↑
e1

“Giza 86 cultivar significantly surpassed Giza 88 cultivar and gave the greatest mean values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–994 · show in text ↑
e2

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 88 had the highest upper half mean length, length uniformity and fiber strength.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 88e0
Outcome
upper half mean length, length uniformity index, fiber strengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 88 recorded the highest mean values of upper half mean length, length uniformity index, fiber strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1415 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 88 had the highest fiber yellowness degree.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 88e0
Outcome
fiber yellowness degreee0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Giza 88 recorded the highest mean values of upper half mean length, length uniformity index, fiber strength and fiber yellowness degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1443 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient treatments differed significantly in cotton growth, yield and fiber traits.

Treatment
eight microelements treatmentse0
Outcome
growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber propertiese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences between the studied eight microelements treatments on growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber properties of cotton during 2015 and 2016 seasons were significant except, fiber reflectance and fiber yellowness degree were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber reflectance did not significantly differ among micronutrient treatments.

Treatment
eight microelements treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber reflectancee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight microelements treatments on growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber properties of cotton during 2015 and 2016 seasons were significant except, fiber reflectance and fiber yellowness degree were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber yellowness did not significantly differ among micronutrient treatments.

Treatment
eight microelements treatmentse0
Outcome
fiber yellowness degreee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“eight microelements treatments on growth, yield components and yield as well as fiber properties of cotton during 2015 and 2016 seasons were significant except, fiber reflectance and fiber yellowness degree were not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn + Mn + Fe produced the highest plant height, sympodial branches and open bolls.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Treatment
Zn + Mn + Fee0
Outcome
plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plante0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn + Mn + Fe treatment gave significantly the greatest mean values of plant height, No. of sympodial branches/plant, No. of open bolls/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1919 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn + Mn + Fe produced the highest lint yield per feddan, upper half mean length and length uniformity.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Treatment
Zn + Mn + Fee1
Outcome
lint cotton yield/fed, upper half mean length, length uniformity indexe0
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint cotton yield/fed, upper half mean length, length uniformity index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2097 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn + Mn + Fe treatment gave significantly the greatest mean values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1845 · show in text ↑
e2

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn + Mn + Fe produced the highest fiber strength, elongation and micronaire.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Treatment
Zn + Mn + Fee1
Outcome
fiber strength, fiber elongation %, micronaire valuee0
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fiber strength, fiber elongation %, micronaire value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2099–2151 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn + Mn + Fe treatment gave significantly the greatest mean values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1845 · show in text ↑
e2

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn + Mn + Fe produced the highest fiber maturity ratio.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Treatment
Zn + Mn + Fee1
Outcome
fiber maturity ratioe0
Direction
greateste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fiber maturity ratio in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2156–2196 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn + Mn + Fe treatment gave significantly the greatest mean values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1779–1845 · show in text ↑
e2

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 with Zn + Mn + Fe had the highest open bolls, seed cotton yield per plant and boll weight.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 86e0
Treatment
mixed Zn + Mn + Fe treatmente0
Outcome
No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, boll weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting Giza 86 which foliar spray by mixed Zn + Mn + Fe treatment significantly recorded the highest mean values of No. of open bolls/plant, seed cotton yield/plant, boll weight”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 2198–2377 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 86 with Zn + Mn + Fe had the highest lint yield per plant and seed and lint yield per feddan.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee2
Material
Giza 86e1
Treatment
mixed Zn + Mn + Fe treatmente1
Outcome
lint cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint cotton yield/fede0
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lint cotton yield/plant, seed cotton yield/fed, lint cotton yield/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2379–2448 · show in text ↑
e1

“planting Giza 86 which foliar spray by mixed Zn + Mn + Fe treatment significantly recorded the highest mean values”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 2198–2312 · show in text ↑
e2

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 88 with Zn + Mn + Fe surpassed other combinations for upper half mean length, uniformity and strength.

Taxon
Gossypium barbadenseGossypium barbadensee1
Material
Giza 88e0
Treatment
Zn + Mn + Fe treatmente2
Outcome
upper half mean length, length uniformity index and fiber strengthe0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other combinationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting Giza 88 under the same micronutrients application surpassed the other combinations in upper half mean length, length uniformity index and fiber strength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2518–2679 · show in text ↑
e1

“Egyptian cotton (Gossypium barbadense, L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–537 · show in text ↑
e2

“combined of Zn + Mn + Fe treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1801 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.