Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth and Yield Attributing Parameters of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under Protected Condition

Sudeshna Kharga; Pranabjyoti Sarma; S.D. Warade; et al.

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at College of Horticulture and Forestry, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh to study the effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) grown under protected condition. It was laid out in Randomized Block Design comprising of thirteen treatments replicated thrice. The experiment was conducted during the off season with gynoecious hybrid variety KSP-1301. Integration of inorganic fertilizers, organic manures and biofertilizers has increased the efficacy of the nutrients in the soil. Integration of vermicompost with inorganic fertilizers and microbial inoculants has efficiently contributed in mineralisation of unavailable forms of nutrient to the available form. The results revealed that the vines of cucumber fertilized with T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha) recorded maximum vine length (190.26 cm), number of branches per plant (12.97) and internodal length (13.86 cm). However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave maximum vine length of 190.26 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha)e0
Outcome
vine lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
190.26 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the vines of cucumber fertilized with T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha) recorded maximum vine length (190.26 cm), number of branches per plant (12.97) and internodal length (13.86 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave maximum number of branches per plant of 12.97.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha)e0
Outcome
number of branches per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12.97e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the vines of cucumber fertilized with T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha) recorded maximum vine length (190.26 cm), number of branches per plant (12.97) and internodal length (13.86 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 gave maximum internodal length of 13.86 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha)e0
Outcome
internodal lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.86 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the vines of cucumber fertilized with T5 (75% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 7.5 t/ha) recorded maximum vine length (190.26 cm), number of branches per plant (12.97) and internodal length (13.86 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior days to 50% flowering result of 34.01.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
days to 50% floweringe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
34.01e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior days to 50% fruiting result of 45.01.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
days to 50% fruitinge0
Direction
superiore0
Value
45.01e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior fruit length result of 16.20 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
16.20 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior fruit breadth result of 4.21 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit breadthe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
4.21 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior fruit girth result of 13.18 cm.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit girthe0
Direction
superiore0
Value
13.18 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior fruit weight result of 197.39 g.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
197.39 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior yield of fruits per vine result of 1.75 kg.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
yield of fruits per vinee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
1.75 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior yield of fruits per plot result of 12.43 kg.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
yield of fruits per plote0
Direction
superiore0
Value
12.43 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior number of fruits per vine result of 10.81.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
number of fruits per vinee0
Direction
superiore0
Value
10.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior number of fruits per plot result of 91.51.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
number of fruits per plote0
Direction
superiore0
Value
91.51e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T13 gave a superior total yield result of 287.89 q/ha.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
287.89 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the superior response in terms of flowering and the yield attributing parameters like minimum days to 50% flowering (34.01), minimum days to 50% fruiting (45.01), fruit length (16.20 cm), fruit breadth (4.21 cm), fruit girth (13.18 cm), fruit weight (197.39 g), yield of fruits per vine (1.75 kg), yield of fruits per plot (12.43 kg), number of fruits per vine (10.81), number of fruits per plot (91.51) and total yield (287.89 q/ha) was recorded from T13 (50% of RDF of NPK + vermicompost @ 5 t/ha + Azotobacter @ 5 kg/ha + PSB @ 5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–95 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Azotobacter · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.