Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, flowering and yield attributes of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Jagraj Singh; Manoj Kumar Singh; Mukesh Kumar; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment was conducted on cucumber with using various INM treatments during the summer season of year 2018 to find out the effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, flowering and yield attributes of cucumber. Total ten treatments were tried in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control. Similarly, maximum net return (Rs. 66747 ha-1) and cost benefit ratio (2.27) were also found in the treatment 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum vine length of 137.70 cm compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
vine lengthe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
137.70 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased the number of leaves per plant to 97.80 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
number of leaves plant-1e1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
97.80e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum number of primary branches of 8.50 per plant compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
number of primary branches plant-1e1
Direction
maximume1
Value
8.50e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum leaf length and width of 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
length and width of leafe1
Direction
maximume1
Value
16.20 cm and 17.70 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the minimum days to first flower formation of 37.80 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
days to first flower formatione1
Direction
minimume1
Value
37.80e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the lowest number of male flowers per plant of 52.20 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
number of male flowers plant-1e1
Direction
loweste1
Value
52.20e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum number of female flowers per plant of 27.70 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
number of female flowers plant-1e1
Direction
maximume1
Value
27.70e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the lowest sex ratio of 1.90 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
sex ratioe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
1.90e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the minimum days taken to first fruit formation of 53.40 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
days taken to first fruit formatione1
Direction
minimume1
Value
53.40e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum number of fruits per plant of 8.35 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
number of fruits plant-1e1
Direction
maximume1
Value
8.35e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased fruit length to 20.20 cm compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
length of fruite1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
20.20 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased fruit weight to 161.50 g compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
weight of fruite1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
161.50 ge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum fruit yield per plant of 1.34 kg compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
fruit yield plant-1e1
Direction
maximume1
Value
1.34 kge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased fruit yield per plot to 8.04 kg compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
fruit yield plot-1e1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
8.04 kge1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the highest fruit yield of 148.88 q ha-1 compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
148.88 q ha-1e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum TSS of edible fruit of 4.11 0Brix compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
TSS of edible fruite1
Direction
maximume1
Value
4.11 0Brixe1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment gave the maximum net return of Rs. 66747 ha-1.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e2
Outcome
net returne2
Direction
maximume2
Value
Rs. 66747 ha-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Similarly, maximum net return (Rs. 66747 ha-1) and cost benefit ratio (2.27) were also found in the treatment 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased the cost benefit ratio to 2.27.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e2
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
2.27e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Similarly, maximum net return (Rs. 66747 ha-1) and cost benefit ratio (2.27) were also found in the treatment 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased fruit width to 4.38 cm compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
width of fruite1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
4.38 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 treatment increased peel thickness to 1.33 cm compared with control.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1e1
Outcome
peel thicknesse1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
1.33 cme1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Out of these an application of 75% RDF + 12.5% FYM + 12.5% VC ha-1 had a beneficial effect on growth parameters like maximum vine length (137.70 cm), number of leaves plant-1 (97.80), maximum number of primary branches plant-1 (8.50), maximum length and width of leaf i.e. 16.20 cm and 17.70 cm. flowering parameters viz. minimum days to first flower formation (37.80), minimum number of days to first male and female flower formation i.e. 39.70 and 44.57, lowest number of male flowers plant-1 (52.20), maximum number of female flowers plant-1 (27.70), lowest sex ratio (1.90) and yield and yield attributing characters like minimum days taken to first fruit formation (53.40), maximum number of fruits plant-1 (8.35), length of fruit (20.20 cm), width of fruit (4.38 cm), weight of fruit (161.50 g), maximum fruit yield plant-1 (1.34 kg), fruit yield plot-1 (8.04 kg), highest fruit yield (148.88 q ha-1), maximum TSS of edible fruit (4.11 0Brix) and peel thickness( 1.33 cm) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–115 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

178 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 263 positive, 25 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.