Paper · 2019 · PLoS ONE

Adjusting cotton planting density under the climatic conditions of Henan Province, China

Liyuan Liu; Chuanzong Li; Yingchun Han; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables such as temperature and solar radiation. Adjusting planting density is one of the most effective measures for maximizing cotton yield under certain climatic conditions. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the optimum planting density and the corresponding leaf area index (LAI) and yield under the climatic conditions of Henan Province, China, and (2) to learn how climatic conditions influence cotton growth, yield, and yield components. A three-year (2013-2015) field experiment was conducted in Anyang, Henan Province, using cultivar SCRC28 across six planting density treatments: 15,000, 33,000, 51,000, 69,000, 87,000, and 105,000 plants ha-1. The data showed that the yield attributes, including seed cotton yield, lint yield, dry matter accumulation, and the LAI, increased as planting density increased. Consequently, the treatment of the maximum density with 105,000 plants ha-1 was the highest-yielding over three years, with the LAIs averaged across the three years being 0.37 at the bud stage, 2.36 at the flower and boll-forming stage, and 1.37 at the boll-opening stage. Furthermore, the correlation between the cotton yield attributes and meteorological conditions indicated that light interception (LI) and the diurnal temperature range were the climatic factors that most strongly influenced cotton seed yield. Moreover, the influence of the number of growing degree days (GDD) on cotton was different at different growth stages. These observations will be useful for determining best management practices for cotton production under the climatic conditions of Henan Province, China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield, lint yield and dry matter accumulation increased as planting density increased.

Material
SCRC28e2
Treatment
planting densitye1
Outcome
seed cotton yield, lint yield, dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Anyang, Henan Provincee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data showed that the yield attributes, including seed cotton yield, lint yield, dry matter accumulation, and the LAI, increased as planting density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–904 · show in text ↑
e2

“A three-year (2013-2015) field experiment was conducted in Anyang, Henan Province, using cultivar SCRC28 across six planting density treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index increased as planting density increased.

Treatment
planting densitye1
Outcome
LAIe1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“The data showed that the yield attributes, including seed cotton yield, lint yield, dry matter accumulation, and the LAI, increased as planting density increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum density of 105,000 plants ha-1 was the highest-yielding treatment over three years.

Treatment
maximum density with 105,000 plants ha-1e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highest-yieldinge1
Qualifier
over three yearse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment of the maximum density with 105,000 plants ha-1 was the highest-yielding over three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1023 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average LAI at the bud stage was 0.37 over three years.

Organ / stage
bud stagee1
Outcome
LAIse1
Value
0.37e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the LAIs averaged across the three years being 0.37 at the bud stage, 2.36 at the flower and boll-forming stage, and 1.37 at the boll-opening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average LAI at the flower and boll-forming stage was 2.36 over three years.

Organ / stage
flower and boll-forming stagee1
Outcome
LAIse1
Value
2.36e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the LAIs averaged across the three years being 0.37 at the bud stage, 2.36 at the flower and boll-forming stage, and 1.37 at the boll-opening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average LAI at the boll-opening stage was 1.37 over three years.

Organ / stage
boll-opening stagee1
Outcome
LAIse1
Value
1.37e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth and development of cotton are closely related to climatic variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the LAIs averaged across the three years being 0.37 at the bud stage, 2.36 at the flower and boll-forming stage, and 1.37 at the boll-opening stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light interception and the diurnal temperature range were the climatic factors that most strongly influenced cotton seed yield.

Treatment
light interception (LI) and the diurnal temperature rangee0
Outcome
cotton seed yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light interception (LI) and the diurnal temperature range were the climatic factors that most strongly influenced cotton seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1420 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The influence of growing degree days on cotton differed among growth stages.

Organ / stage
growth stagese0
Treatment
number of growing degree days (GDD)e0
Outcome
the influence of the number of growing degree days (GDD) on cottone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the influence of the number of growing degree days (GDD) on cotton was different at different growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1539 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

density · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 34 positive, 35 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.