Abstract
In an investigation carried out during Kharif 2018, bio-efficacy of nine insecticides and bio-pesticides (including control) were tested against major sucking pest Leafhopper, Empoasca kerri Pruthi of groundnut at S.K.N. College of Agriculture, Jobner (Rajasthan). On the basis of mean per cent reduction in leafhopper population the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8SL (84.31%) was found most effective, followed by thiamethoxam 25WG (81.66%) and acetamiprid 20SP (80%) and were also statistically at par with each other in their efficacy. Bio-pesticides Metarhizium anisopliae 1.15 WP (33.56%) and NSKE (Neem Seed Kernel Extract) (49.68%) were proved least effective, however both were differed significantly with each other. The descending order of effectiveness of treatments were as imidacloprid > thiamethoxam > acetamiprid > methyl demeton > fipronil > acephate > NSKE > Metarhizium anisopliae. The highest pod yield was obtained from the plot treated with insecticide imidacloprid (27.16 qha-1) followed by thiamethoxam (26.58 qha-1) and acetamiprid (26.11 qha-1) and were statistically at par with each other.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
imidacloprid 17.8SL reduced groundnut leafhopper population by 84.31%
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8SLe0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere0pest
- Outcome
- leafhopper populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 84.31%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the basis of mean per cent reduction in leafhopper population the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8SL (84.31%) was found most effective, followed by thiamethoxam 25WG (81.66%) and acetamiprid 20SP (80%) and were also statistically at par with each other in their efficacy.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
thiamethoxam 25WG reduced groundnut leafhopper population by 81.66%
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25WGe0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere0pest
- Outcome
- leafhopper populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 81.66%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the basis of mean per cent reduction in leafhopper population the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8SL (84.31%) was found most effective, followed by thiamethoxam 25WG (81.66%) and acetamiprid 20SP (80%) and were also statistically at par with each other in their efficacy.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
acetamiprid 20SP reduced groundnut leafhopper population by 80%
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- acetamiprid 20SPe0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere0pest
- Outcome
- leafhopper populatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 80%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“On the basis of mean per cent reduction in leafhopper population the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8SL (84.31%) was found most effective, followed by thiamethoxam 25WG (81.66%) and acetamiprid 20SP (80%) and were also statistically at par with each other in their efficacy.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Metarhizium anisopliae 1.15 WP was among the least effective treatments, with 33.56% leafhopper reduction.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Metarhizium anisopliae 1.15 WPe0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere1pest
- Second interactor
- Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- leafhopper populatione1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 33.56%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bio-pesticides Metarhizium anisopliae 1.15 WP (33.56%) and NSKE (Neem Seed Kernel Extract) (49.68%) were proved least effective, however both were differed significantly with each other.”
e1“On the basis of mean per cent reduction in leafhopper population the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8SL (84.31%) was found most effective, followed by thiamethoxam 25WG (81.66%) and acetamiprid 20SP (80%) and were also statistically at par with each other in their efficacy.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
NSKE (Neem Seed Kernel Extract) was among the least effective treatments, with 49.68% leafhopper reduction.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- NSKE (Neem Seed Kernel Extract)e0
- Interactor
- leafhoppere1pest
- Outcome
- leafhopper populatione1
- Direction
- reductione1
- Value
- 49.68%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bio-pesticides Metarhizium anisopliae 1.15 WP (33.56%) and NSKE (Neem Seed Kernel Extract) (49.68%) were proved least effective, however both were differed significantly with each other.”
e1“On the basis of mean per cent reduction in leafhopper population the treatment of imidacloprid 17.8SL (84.31%) was found most effective, followed by thiamethoxam 25WG (81.66%) and acetamiprid 20SP (80%) and were also statistically at par with each other in their efficacy.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut pod yield under imidacloprid was 27.16 qha-1.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 27.16 qha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest pod yield was obtained from the plot treated with insecticide imidacloprid (27.16 qha-1) followed by thiamethoxam (26.58 qha-1) and acetamiprid (26.11 qha-1) and were statistically at par with each other.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut pod yield under thiamethoxam was 26.58 qha-1.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxame0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Value
- 26.58 qha-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest pod yield was obtained from the plot treated with insecticide imidacloprid (27.16 qha-1) followed by thiamethoxam (26.58 qha-1) and acetamiprid (26.11 qha-1) and were statistically at par with each other.”
t0“groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnut pod yield under acetamiprid was 26.11 qha-1.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- acetamipride0
- Outcome
- pod yielde0
- Value
- 26.11 qha-1e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest pod yield was obtained from the plot treated with insecticide imidacloprid (27.16 qha-1) followed by thiamethoxam (26.58 qha-1) and acetamiprid (26.11 qha-1) and were statistically at par with each other.”
t0“groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
Azadirachta indica · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
acetamiprid · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiamethoxam · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Metarhizium anisopliae · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →botanical · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.