Paper · 2022 · Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control

Field evaluation of the entomopathogenic fungi enriched with organic amendments against Holotrichia consanguinea Blanchard (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) infesting groundnut crop

Prakash S. Patel; Sushma Deb; Prakash H. Rabari; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background White grubs are highly polyphagous and most destructive soil pests inflicting damage to a groundnut crop that causes economic yield losses in commercial groundnut production in India. In this study, potential of the two entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) viz., Metarhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) Sorokin and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin enriched with organic amendments like neem cake, castor cake, vermicompost and poultry manure was evaluated to manage buildup of white grub population in groundnut crop. Results Results showed that the plot treated with soil application of vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha showed the least amount of plant mortality due to white grub which was at par with castor cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha and neem cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha which showed only 1.74, 2.00 and 2.24% plant damage, respectively. Plots treated with vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha had the fewest (0.19) white grubs per one meter row length. Based on highest pod yield, net realization and net gain, the treatment with soil application of vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha was found most effective treatments for the management of white grub in groundnut. Conclusions Results indicated that M. anisopliae supplemented with various organic amendments, such as vermicompost, castor cake, and neem cake can be commercialized as a healthy alternative to minimize the use of synthetic pesticides in groundnut crops for white grub management .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus M. anisopliae resulted in 1.74% groundnut damage and the least plant mortality.

Taxon
groundnut cropArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/hae0
Interactor
white grube0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant damagee0
Direction
leaste0
Value
1.74e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plot treated with soil application of vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha showed the least amount of plant mortality due to white grub which was at par with castor cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha and neem cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha which showed only 1.74, 2.00 and 2.24% plant damage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake plus M. anisopliae resulted in 2.00% plant damage.

Taxon
groundnut cropArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
castor cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/hae0
Outcome
plant damagee0
Value
2.00e0

Not reportedInteractorComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“castor cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha and neem cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha which showed only 1.74, 2.00 and 2.24% plant damage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake plus M. anisopliae resulted in 2.24% plant damage.

Taxon
groundnut cropArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
neem cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/hae0
Outcome
plant damagee0
Value
2.24%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neem cake @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha which showed only 1.74, 2.00 and 2.24% plant damage, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus M. anisopliae had the fewest white grubs, at 0.19 per meter row.

Taxon
groundnut cropArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/hae0
Interactor
white grubse0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
white grubs per one meter row lengthe0
Direction
feweste0
Value
0.19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha had the fewest (0.19) white grubs per one meter row length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 160–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost plus M. anisopliae was most effective by pod yield, net realization and net gain.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/hae0
Interactor
white grube0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod yield, net realization and net gaine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on highest pod yield, net realization and net gain, the treatment with soil application of vermicompost @ 1 ton/ha + M. anisopliae 1.15 WP (1 × 10 8 cfu/g) @ 2 kg/ha was found most effective treatments for the management of white grub in groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1386 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended M. anisopliae with organic amendments as an alternative to synthetic pesticides for groundnut white grub management.

Taxon
groundnut cropsArachis hypogaeae0
Interactor
white grube0pest
Second interactor
M. anisopliaeMetarhizium anisopliaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
healthy alternative to minimize the use of synthetic pesticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Metarhizium anisopliae
Metarhizium anisopliae · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryChengshu Wang and Yuxian Xia · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. anisopliae supplemented with various organic amendments, such as vermicompost, castor cake, and neem cake can be commercialized as a healthy alternative to minimize the use of synthetic pesticides in groundnut crops for white grub management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1666 · show in text ↑

Metarhizium anisopliae · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Metarhizium anisopliae · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.