Abstract
Water shortage is a serious problem faced by the national security of Egypt. Two field experiments were conducted at Marsa Matrouh Agricultural Research Farm during summer seasons of 2013 and 2014 using drip irrigation system, to evaluate the effect of some fog water harvesting models (f.w.h.m) of model-1, model-2, model-3 and model-4 under some farmyard manure (FYM) rates (20, 30, 40 m3)/fad on groundnut productivity. Results cleared that model-1 exposed its superiority on the total water amount harvested during the two seasons that led to give significant greatest values of, pods, seeds yield/plant or /faddan, biological yield/fad., shelling %, seed and harvest index, seed protein and oil percentage and water use efficiency, and also that model confirmed its superiority and led to give the lowest percentage of number of seeds/pod, number of pods and seed/100 (g). It is worthy to mention that, (f.w.h) model-1 also led to enhance peanut yield as compared to the other (f.w.h.m) during the two experimental seasons. Results revealed that, increasing (FYM) improves the most values of the previous peanut traits significantly, during the two seasons, and on the other hand, peanut shelling %, number of pod and seeds per pod decreased significantly by increasing the added amount of (FYM) /fad. The interaction between f.w.h.m and (FYM) rates showed significant effect on, growing plant and per fad. Peanut plants under the condition of f.w.h model-1 fertilized by 30 or 40 m3 of that fertilizer gave best significant values for most studied peanut traits compared with other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Fog water harvesting model-1 enhanced peanut yield compared with the other fog water harvesting models.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- model-1e5
- Outcome
- peanut yielde5
- Direction
- enhancee5
- Comparator
- the other (f.w.h.m)e5
- Setting
- Marsa Matrouh Agricultural Research Farme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Two field experiments were conducted at Marsa Matrouh Agricultural Research Farm”
e1“on groundnut productivity”
e5“(f.w.h) model-1 also led to enhance peanut yield as compared to the other (f.w.h.m)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fog water harvesting model-1 showed superiority in the total water amount harvested.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- model-1e3
- Outcome
- total water amount harvestede3
- Direction
- superioritye3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on groundnut productivity”
e3“model-1 exposed its superiority on the total water amount harvested during the two seasons that led to give significant greatest values of, pods, seeds yield/plant or /faddan, biological yield/fad., shelling %, seed and harvest index, seed protein and oil percentage and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Fog water harvesting model-1 gave significant greatest values for pods, seed yield and biological yield.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- model-1e3
- Outcome
- pods, seeds yield/plant or /faddan, biological yield/fad.e3
- Direction
- greatest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on groundnut productivity”
e3“model-1 exposed its superiority on the total water amount harvested during the two seasons that led to give significant greatest values of, pods, seeds yield/plant or /faddan, biological yield/fad., shelling %, seed and harvest index, seed protein and oil percentage and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Fog water harvesting model-1 gave significant greatest values for shelling percentage, seed and harvest index.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- model-1e3
- Outcome
- shelling %, seed and harvest indexe3
- Direction
- greatest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on groundnut productivity”
e3“model-1 exposed its superiority on the total water amount harvested during the two seasons that led to give significant greatest values of, pods, seeds yield/plant or /faddan, biological yield/fad., shelling %, seed and harvest index, seed protein and oil percentage and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Fog water harvesting model-1 gave significant greatest values for seed protein, oil percentage and water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- model-1e3
- Outcome
- seed protein and oil percentage and water use efficiencye3
- Direction
- greatest valuese3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on groundnut productivity”
e3“model-1 exposed its superiority on the total water amount harvested during the two seasons that led to give significant greatest values of, pods, seeds yield/plant or /faddan, biological yield/fad., shelling %, seed and harvest index, seed protein and oil percentage and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Fog water harvesting model-1 gave the lowest number of seeds per pod, number of pods and seed weight per 100 g.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Treatment
- model-1e3
- Outcome
- number of seeds/pod, number of pods and seed/100 (g)e4
- Direction
- lowest percentagee4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“on groundnut productivity”
e3“model-1 exposed its superiority on the total water amount harvested during the two seasons”
e4“model confirmed its superiority and led to give the lowest percentage of number of seeds/pod, number of pods and seed/100 (g)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing FYM improved most values of the previous peanut traits significantly.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae6
- Treatment
- increasing (FYM)e6
- Outcome
- the most values of the previous peanut traitse6
- Direction
- improvese6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“increasing (FYM) improves the most values of the previous peanut traits significantly, during the two seasons”
e1“on groundnut productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing the added amount of FYM significantly decreased peanut shelling percentage, pod number and seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae7
- Treatment
- increasing the added amount of (FYM) /fade7
- Outcome
- peanut shelling %, number of pod and seeds per pode7
- Direction
- decreasede7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“peanut shelling %, number of pod and seeds per pod decreased significantly by increasing the added amount of (FYM) /fad”
Claim · model-written summary
The interaction between fog water harvesting models and FYM rates had a significant effect on growing plant and per faddan values.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae6
- Outcome
- growing plant and per fade7
- Qualifier
- The interaction between f.w.h.m and (FYM) ratese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“The interaction between f.w.h.m and (FYM) rates showed significant effect on, growing plant and per fad”
e6“increasing (FYM) improves the most values of the previous peanut traits significantly, during the two seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut under model-1 fertilized with 30 or 40 m3 of FYM gave the best significant values for most studied traits compared with other treatments.
- Taxon
- PeanutArachis hypogaeae7
- Treatment
- fertilized by 30 or 40 m3 of that fertilizere7
- Outcome
- most studied peanut traitse7
- Direction
- beste7
- Qualifier
- under the condition of f.w.h model-1e7
- Comparator
- other treatmentse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Peanut plants under the condition of f.w.h model-1 fertilized by 30 or 40 m3 of that fertilizer gave best significant values for most studied peanut traits compared with other treatments”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
679 papers more in this group
See all 683 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.