Paper · 2019 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Combination urea and compost fertilizer with different defoliation affected corn and peanut production based on integrated farming system

Syamsul Bahri; Asmuddin Natsir; Syamsuddin Hasan; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was aimed to study the effect of combination of compost and urea fertilizer, leaf defoliation intercropping system of corn and peanut crop. This study was conducted for 4 months and designed by Separate Plot Design. Defoliation of leaves under cob is main plot and combination of urea and compost doses is subplot. The treatments are as follows; main plot d0 = Without defoliation (control); d1 = 50% Defoliation; d2 = 100% Defoliation and combination of Urea and Compost doses; Subplot; p0 = 250 kg Urea/ha + 3 tons of compost/ha; p1 = 230 kg Urea/ha + 6 tons of compost/ha p2 = 210 kg Urea/ha + 9 tons of compost/ha; p3 = 190 kg Urea/ha + 12 tons of compost/ha. Each combination is repeated three times so that the total number is 36 plot experiments. Data were analyzed by using variance analysis and analysis of continuation test of least significance different (LSD). The results showed that the combination of fertilization is the same dry shelled corn production and dry peanut. d1 treatment and its interaction could increase dry production of shelled corn and peanut. Intercropping of corn and peanut is feasible to be cultivated in an integrated farming system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of urea and compost fertilization gave the same dry shelled corn production.

Treatment
combination of fertilizatione1
Outcome
dry shelled corn productione1
Direction
samee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the combination of fertilization is the same dry shelled corn production and dry peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of urea and compost fertilization gave the same dry peanut production.

Treatment
combination of fertilizatione1
Outcome
dry peanute1
Direction
samee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the combination of fertilization is the same dry shelled corn production and dry peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The d1 treatment could increase dry production of shelled corn.

Treatment
d1 treatment and its interactione2
Outcome
dry productione2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
coulde2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“d1 treatment and its interaction could increase dry production of shelled corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The d1 treatment could increase dry production of peanut.

Treatment
d1 treatment and its interactione2
Outcome
dry productione2
Direction
increasee2
Qualifier
coulde2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“d1 treatment and its interaction could increase dry production of shelled corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1089 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that corn and peanut intercropping is feasible in an integrated farming system.

Outcome
feasible to be cultivated in an integrated farming systeme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Intercropping of corn and peanut is feasible to be cultivated in an integrated farming system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1184 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.