Paper · 2021 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility as influenced by integrated nitrogen management and foliar spray of iron in groundnut on Typic Ustochrept

N.K. Pareek; Shri Rakesh

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at experiment farm, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner during two consecutive kharif seasons in sandy and slightly alkaline Ustochrepts/Entisols to study the effect of integrated use of organic and inorganic source of N in conjunction with Fe on nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility status of groundnut. Application of FYM @ 15 t ha−1 significantly increased the soil organic carbon content, available N status, available P2O5 status and available K2O status during both the years, respectively. Increasing levels of nitrogen had a tendency of improving the organic carbon content and available N status of soil and decreasing the available P, available K and DTPA extractable iron status of the soil only slightly during both the years. Foliar spray of Fe applied alone or in combination with citric acid had no significant effect on the organic carbon content and available N, P, K and DTPA extractable iron status of the soil after harvest of the crop during both the years. Response of groundnut to applied nitrogen decreased considerably with FYM application and foliar spray of iron alone or applied in integration with citric acid @ 0.1% during both the years and pooled basis while increasing levels of nitrogen decreased the NUE while its application in more number of splits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM increased soil organic carbon and available N, P and K.

Treatment
FYM @ 15 t ha−1e0
Outcome
soil organic carbon content, available N status, available P2O5 statuse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @ 15 t ha−1 significantly increased the soil organic carbon content, available N status, available P2O5 status and available K2O status during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen tended to improve soil carbon and available N.

Treatment
Increasing levels of nitrogene0
Outcome
organic carbon content and available N status of soile0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing levels of nitrogen had a tendency of improving the organic carbon content and available N status of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen slightly decreased soil available P, K and iron.

Outcome
available P, available K and DTPA extractable iron status of the soile0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the available P, available K and DTPA extractable iron status of the soil only slightly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron had no significant effect on measured soil fertility status.

Treatment
Foliar spray of Fee0
Outcome
organic carbon content and available N, P, K and DTPA extractable iron status of the soile0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar spray of Fe applied alone or in combination with citric acid had no significant effect on the organic carbon content and available N, P, K and DTPA extractable iron status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM reduced groundnut response to applied nitrogen.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
FYM applicatione0
Outcome
Response of groundnut to applied nitrogene0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Response of groundnut to applied nitrogen decreased considerably with FYM application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron reduced groundnut response to applied nitrogen.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
foliar spray of irone0

Not reportedComparatorOutcomeDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spray of iron alone or applied in integration with citric acid @ 0.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen decreased nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
increasing levels of nitrogene0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing levels of nitrogen decreased the NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–128 · show in text ↑

iron atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 42 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 147 positive, 6 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.