Paper · 2003 · Acta Agraria Debreceniensis

Effect of Irrigation on Maize Yield (Zea mays L.)

János Nagy

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We have been continually examining the fertilizer and irrigation reaction of commonly cultivated maize hybrids for nearly twenty years at the Látókép experimental station of the Center for Agricultural Sciences, Debrecen University.Upon evaluating the results, it can be established that year significantly influences the size of yield. Between the years of 1999 and 2002, in the average of applied fertilizers the difference is 3,4 t/ha, but even in irrigated treatments it reaches 3 t/ha. This is more than the effect of irrigation. Of the applied agrotechnical elements, the yield increasing effect of fertilization is the greatest and can even be greater than the effect of year. The yield increasing effect of fertilization can be reliably detected with small and medium doses, but at higher doses a plateau section is reached, where it is not worth applying more nutrients. Cultivation with irrigation can only be done with appropriate nutrient supply, due to the positive correlation of the two factors. The positive correlation also means that if the water supply of the plant declines, less fertilizer is needed for safe production. The two factors (irrigation and fertilization) have to be increased or decreased at the same time.According to the experiment, in unirrigated treatments, 90 kg/ha nitrogen and the related phosphorus and potassium are enough, while in irrigated treatments this was 120 kg.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year significantly influenced maize yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
yielde0
Setting
yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“year significantly influences the size of yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield varied by 3,4 t/ha across years.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
differencee0
Value
3,4 t/hae0
Setting
years of 1999 and 2002e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Between the years of 1999 and 2002, in the average of applied fertilizers the difference is 3,4 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yearly yield variation reached 3 t/ha in irrigated treatments.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigated treatmentse0
Outcome
differencee0
Value
3 t/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the difference is 3,4 t/ha, but even in irrigated treatments it reaches 3 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased yield more than other agrotechnical elements.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
effect of yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield increasing effect of fertilization is the greatest and can even be greater than the effect of year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small and medium fertilizer doses increased yield, with a plateau at higher doses.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
small and medium dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
higher dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increasing effect of fertilization can be reliably detected with small and medium doses, but at higher doses a plateau section is reached”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and fertilization were positively correlated.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
positive correlatione0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
nutrient supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation with irrigation can only be done with appropriate nutrient supply, due to the positive correlation of the two factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend paired adjustment of irrigation and fertilization.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
irrigation and fertilization) have to be increased or decreased at the same timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two factors (irrigation and fertilization) have to be increased or decreased at the same time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report 90 kg/ha nitrogen plus phosphorus and potassium as sufficient without irrigation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
unirrigated treatmentse0
Outcome
90 kg/ha nitrogen and the related phosphorus and potassium are enoughe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in unirrigated treatments, 90 kg/ha nitrogen and the related phosphorus and potassium are enough”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors report 120 kg nitrogen as sufficient under irrigation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
in irrigated treatments this was 120 kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while in irrigated treatments this was 120 kg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑

in vitro · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 44 positive, 8 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.