Paper · 2022 · Review on Agriculture and Rural Development

Evaluation of NDVI, SPAD values and yield of two different maize (Zeamays l.) genotypes under foliar fertilisation

Ibtissem Balaout; Annabella Zelenák; Anikó Nyéki; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ensuring global food security has become a matter of great concern with the constantly increasing population growth, resulting in rising food demands. Simultaneously, climate change and land degradation pose major risks to agricultural production. Maize is one of the most produced crops globally and maize yields must be increased to meet the population’s needs. Fertilisation is considered indispensable for the crop growth and development. Foliar fertilisation, unlike root fertilisation, enables rapid access of nutrients to plants while sustaining the environment. Our research was carried out at Látókép in 2021, where, foliar sprays of Natur Plasma T biostimulant, Natur Active complex foliar fertiliser, Zinc and Sulphur Mono additives were applied at the 8-leaf stage on two maize hybrids, Mv 352 (FAO 350) and Mv Anissa (FAO 510). The main objectives were to examine the treatment’s effect on crops at critical phenophases (12-leaf stage, silking, maturity), besides determining its impacts on the harvested yields. Based on our findings, foliar nutrients had positively influenced the NDVI and SPAD values of both crops. Furthermore, in comparison with the control plots, the yield of Mv Anissa was 9% higher, while that of Mv 352 was 5.4% higher. Consequently, Mv Anissa produced the highest yield of 21.345 t/ha, i.e. 2.8 tons higher than that obtained by Mv 352. Moreover, the treatment increased their thousand-grain weight. Thereby, our study demonstrates the efficiency of the foliar fertilisation method in improving maize vegetative growth and development in addition to its productivity by enhancing its final yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nutrients increased NDVI and SPAD in both maize hybrids.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar nutrientse0
Outcome
NDVI and SPAD valuese0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on our findings, foliar nutrients had positively influenced the NDVI and SPAD values of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zeamays l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatment raised Mv Anissa yield by 9% versus control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Mv Anissae0
Treatment
foliar fertilisationt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
9%e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, in comparison with the control plots, the yield of Mv Anissa was 9% higher, while that of Mv 352 was 5.4% higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zeamays l.) genotypes under foliar fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatment raised Mv 352 yield by 5.4% versus control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Mv 352e0
Treatment
foliar fertilisationt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.4%e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, in comparison with the control plots, the yield of Mv Anissa was 9% higher, while that of Mv 352 was 5.4% higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zeamays l.) genotypes under foliar fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mv Anissa yielded 21.345 t/ha, 2.8 tons above Mv 352.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Mv Anissae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
21.345 t/hae0
Qualifier
2.8 tons highere0
Comparator
Mv 352e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Consequently, Mv Anissa produced the highest yield of 21.345 t/ha, i.e. 2.8 tons higher than that obtained by Mv 352.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zeamays l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatment increased maize thousand-grain weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar fertilisationt0
Outcome
thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, the treatment increased their thousand-grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1439 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zeamays l.) genotypes under foliar fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–114 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.