Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Stepped foliar plasma activated water application decreased chlorophyll content in maize leaves compared with distilled water application.

A claim from Effect of Plasma Activated Water Foliar Application on Selected Growth Parameters of Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stepped foliar plasma activated water application decreased chlorophyll content in maize leaves compared with distilled water application.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
stepped PAW foliar applicatione2
Outcome
chlorophyll contents in leavese2
Direction
decreasee2
Comparator
distilled water applicatione2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“a pot experiment was realized in order to prove effects of the foliar PAW application on maize growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–414
e2

“The stepped PAW foliar application, carried out in 7-day intervals, led to provable decrease of chlorophyll contents in leaves compared to the distilled water application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–586

Title

Effect of Plasma Activated Water Foliar Application on Selected Growth Parameters of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Petr Škarpa; Daniel Klofáč; František Krčma; et al. Water 2020. doi:10.3390/w12123545

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-eaa6d924126301dad42250f15f727161b7a9c208572f8c76680648bd481bfd57 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 84 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

physical treatment · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.