Abstract
To assess economic of different weed control methods on transplanted rice, a research was conducted at farmers’ fields, Bhanu-11, Rupakot, Nepal during the rainy season of 2017. The experiment was laid out using single factorial Randomized Complete Block Designs (RCBD) with three replications of ten treatments as one hand weeding at 21 Days After Transplanting (DAT) (T1); two hand weedings at 21 and 42 DAT (T2); three hand weedings at 21 42 & 63 DAT (T3); single conoweeding at 21 DAT (T4); double cono weedings at 21 &42 DAT (T5); triple cono weedings at 21, 42 &63 DAT (T6); butachlor as pre emergence (T7); butachlor with single manual weeding at 21 DAT (T8); butachlor with double manual weedings at 21 & 42 DAT (T9) and weedy check (T10). All collected data were subjected to analyzed by computer software R package. The results revealed that butachlor as pre-emergence (T7), showed that significantly higher gross return (Rs. 167.51thousand/ha), net profit (Rs. 96.11thousand/ha) and higher benefit-cost ratio (2.346), which is economically viable and profitable and can recommend to the farmers for rainfed lowland condition.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence butachlor gave gross return of Rs. 167.51thousand/ha.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- butachlor as pre-emergence (T7)e0
- Outcome
- gross returne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 167.51thousand/hae0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“butachlor as pre-emergence (T7), showed that significantly higher gross return (Rs. 167.51thousand/ha)”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence butachlor gave net profit of Rs. 96.11thousand/ha.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- butachlor as pre-emergence (T7)e0
- Outcome
- net profite0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 96.11thousand/hae0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“butachlor as pre-emergence (T7), showed that significantly higher gross return (Rs. 167.51thousand/ha), net profit (Rs. 96.11thousand/ha)”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence butachlor gave benefit-cost ratio of 2.346.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- butachlor as pre-emergence (T7)e0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.346e0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“butachlor as pre-emergence (T7), showed that significantly higher gross return (Rs. 167.51thousand/ha), net profit (Rs. 96.11thousand/ha) and higher benefit-cost ratio (2.346)”
t0“Rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend pre-emergence butachlor for rainfed lowland farmers.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0
- Outcome
- recommend to the farmers for rainfed lowland conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“which is economically viable and profitable and can recommend to the farmers for rainfed lowland condition.”
t0“Rice”
The same questions in other papers
butachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
86 papers more in this group
See all 90 papers →herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
798 papers more in this group
See all 802 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.