Paper · 2019 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

SOME MAIZE LEAF GROWTH TRAITS AS INFLUENCED BY SOME INTEGRATED FERTILIZATION REGIMES

Amira Khattab; A. El-Khawaga; M. Saleh; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the summer season of 2017, and then repeated at the summer season of 2018 in Agricultural Research Station. Faculty of Agric., Zigzag Univ., Sharkia Governorate, Egypt. The study investigated the impact of eleven nitrogen and five phosphorus fertilization regimes on some leaf traits 70 days after sowing (DAS) of maize cultivar single hybrid 168. Results showed that, 120kg N/fad., from different sources i.e., chemical fertilizer, compost and biofertilizers were effectless on number of leaves/plant at 70 days after sowing (DAS) of both seasons and their combined analysis. Number of leaves either under or above the ear of mono eared maize plant were not affected due to applying different nitrogen fertilization regimes studied. Leaf area/maize plant was significantly affected in the first season only. The largest leaf erea/plant (4254.22 cm2/plant) was obtained in the first season, with the appliance of the integrated N fertilization regime (90 kg N from chemical fertilizer +30 kg N from compost). Area of leaves under ear resulted from the integrated fertilization regime (cerealine + 60 kg chemical N+ 60 kg N from compost) was larger than that in the control treatment by 30.94% based on combined results. Regarding to the area of leaves above the ear, results of the 1st season displayed that area of leaves above the ear were at par in treatments N2, N3, N4, N5 and N6. Application of either 120kg chemical fertilizer (N2) or 90 kg chemical N +30 kg N from compost (N3) was conjucated with larger values of leaf area index comparably with other regimes. According to combined analysis, ear leaf area ranged from 481.87 cm2 in control treatment to 625.89 cm2 in the integrated nitrogen fertilization regimes comprised of cerealine + 60 kg chemical N/fad. + 60 kgN from compost. From the results of combined analysis, it could be noted that tassel leaf area ranged between 150.99 to 217.87 cm2 under biofertilization (N11) and the integrated fertilization regimes (N8)in the same order. Insignificant phosphorus fertilization effect under study on maize leaf traits studied at 70DAS, was recorded in both seasons and the combined analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg N/fad. regimes from chemical, compost and biofertilizer sources had no effect on leaves per plant at 70 DAS.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
120kg N/fad., from different sources i.e., chemical fertilizer, compost and biofertilizerse1
Outcome
number of leaves/plante1
Direction
effectlesse1
Qualifier
70 days after sowing (DAS)e1
Setting
both seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“120kg N/fad., from different sources i.e., chemical fertilizer, compost and biofertilizers were effectless on number of leaves/plant at 70 days after sowing (DAS) of both seasons and their combined analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–611 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaves above or under the ear were not affected by the nitrogen fertilization regimes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
different nitrogen fertilization regimes studiede1
Outcome
Number of leaves either under or above the eare1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Number of leaves either under or above the ear of mono eared maize plant were not affected due to applying different nitrogen fertilization regimes studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–768 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area per maize plant was significantly affected by the fertilization regimes in the first season only.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
Leafe1
Treatment
eleven nitrogen and five phosphorus fertilization regimese3
Outcome
Leaf area/maize plante1
Setting
first seasone1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Leaf area/maize plant was significantly affected in the first season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–843 · show in text ↑
e3

“impact of eleven nitrogen and five phosphorus fertilization regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–299 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated N regime (90 kg chemical N + 30 kg compost N) gave the largest leaf area per plant, 4254.22 cm2, in the first season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
integrated N fertilization regime (90 kg N from chemical fertilizer +30 kg N from compost)e1
Outcome
leaf erea/plante1
Direction
largeste1
Value
4254.22 cm2/plante1
Setting
first seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The largest leaf erea/plant (4254.22 cm2/plant) was obtained in the first season, with the appliance of the integrated N fertilization regime (90 kg N from chemical fertilizer +30 kg N from compost)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1043 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated regime with cerealine raised leaf area under the ear by 30.94% over the control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leaves under eare1
Treatment
integrated fertilization regime (cerealine + 60 kg chemical N+ 60 kg N from compost)e1
Outcome
Area of leaves under eare1
Direction
largere1
Value
30.94%e1
Qualifier
based on combined resultse1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Area of leaves under ear resulted from the integrated fertilization regime (cerealine + 60 kg chemical N+ 60 kg N from compost) was larger than that in the control treatment by 30.94% based on combined results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1254 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area above the ear was at par among treatments N2 to N6 in the first season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leaves above the eare1
Treatment
treatments N2, N3, N4, N5 and N6e1
Outcome
area of leaves above the eare1
Direction
at pare1
Setting
1st seasone1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Regarding to the area of leaves above the ear, results of the 1st season displayed that area of leaves above the ear were at par in treatments N2, N3, N4, N5 and N6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1420 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 120 kg chemical fertilizer (N2) regime was associated with larger leaf area index than the other regimes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
120kg chemical fertilizer (N2)e1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
larger valuese1
Comparator
other regimese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of either 120kg chemical fertilizer (N2) or 90 kg chemical N +30 kg N from compost (N3) was conjucated with larger values of leaf area index comparably with other regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1604 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90 kg chemical N + 30 kg compost N regime (N3) was associated with larger leaf area index than the other regimes.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
90 kg chemical N +30 kg N from compost (N3)e1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
larger valuese1
Comparator
other regimese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of either 120kg chemical fertilizer (N2) or 90 kg chemical N +30 kg N from compost (N3) was conjucated with larger values of leaf area index comparably with other regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1604 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear leaf area was higher under the integrated nitrogen regime (625.89 cm2) than in the control (481.87 cm2).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
ear leafe1
Treatment
integrated nitrogen fertilization regimes comprised of cerealine + 60 kg chemical N/fad. + 60 kgN from composte1
Outcome
ear leaf areae1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
625.89 cm2e1
Qualifier
481.87 cm2 in control treatmente1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“According to combined analysis, ear leaf area ranged from 481.87 cm2 in control treatment to 625.89 cm2 in the integrated nitrogen fertilization regimes comprised of cerealine + 60 kg chemical N/fad. + 60 kgN from compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1827 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tassel leaf area under biofertilization (N11) was lower than under the integrated regime (N8), 150.99 to 217.87 cm2 in the same order.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
tassel leafe1
Treatment
biofertilization (N11)e1
Outcome
tassel leaf areae1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
150.99 to 217.87 cm2e1
Qualifier
in the same ordere1
Comparator
integrated fertilization regimes (N8)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“From the results of combined analysis, it could be noted that tassel leaf area ranged between 150.99 to 217.87 cm2 under biofertilization (N11) and the integrated fertilization regimes (N8)in the same order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–2035 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tassel leaf area under the integrated regime (N8) was higher than under biofertilization (N11), 150.99 to 217.87 cm2 in the same order.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
tassel leafe1
Treatment
integrated fertilization regimes (N8)e1
Outcome
tassel leaf areae1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
150.99 to 217.87 cm2e1
Qualifier
in the same ordere1
Comparator
biofertilization (N11)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“From the results of combined analysis, it could be noted that tassel leaf area ranged between 150.99 to 217.87 cm2 under biofertilization (N11) and the integrated fertilization regimes (N8)in the same order”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–2035 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization had an insignificant effect on maize leaf traits at 70 DAS in both seasons and the combined analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Material
single hybrid 168e2
Organ / stage
leafe1
Treatment
phosphorus fertilizatione1
Outcome
maize leaf traitse1
Direction
Insignificante1
Qualifier
70DASe1
Setting
both seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Insignificant phosphorus fertilization effect under study on maize leaf traits studied at 70DAS, was recorded in both seasons and the combined analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2188 · show in text ↑
e2

“maize cultivar single hybrid 168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–382 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

158 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 635 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.