Paper · 2019 · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)

LINKING FERTILIZER TYPE TO CHANGES IN SOIL MICROBIOME AND PLANT-NUTRIENT DYNAMICS

Heisey, Steven

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Farmer interest in Hawaiʻi for organic and biological inputs for crop nitrogen (N) management is increasing, however, there is little research about the how these inputs affect N losses in agricultural soils. Similarly, there has been little research examining the effect of biological fertilizers (e.g. plant growth promoting rhizobacteria) on the soil microbiome and how this might affect subsequent soil function including plant-soil-microbial nutrient flows. To address these knowledge gaps, a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants and a special three-chambered pot design that allowed for greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, and CH4) flux sampling and leachate collection. Treatments included a commercially available Beneficial Soil Microbe (BSM) inoculant, compost, urea, BSM + compost, and BSM + urea. Responses in above- and belowground plant growth, plant tissue micro and macronutrients, soil total nitrogen (N) and carbon (C), pH, soil nitrate and ammonium concentrations, and amount of leached nitrate and ammonium were measured. Fungal and prokaryotic community response was analyzed using a molecular barcoding approach of bacterial & archaeal 16S and fungal ITS rRNA marker genes, and drivers of community dynamics were determined using measured soil variables. Soil functional response was measured using MetaCyc predicted functional pathways for prokaryotes and FUNGuild trophic guild assignment for fungi. Results showed compost additions increased plant growth compared to the biological and synthetic fertilizer treatments. Urea increased the amount of ammonium leached from the soil, while compost increased the amount of nitrate leached. Treatments did not increase CO2 flux compared to the control. Relative to the control, urea treatments increased CH4 flux; and urea, BSM+ urea, and BSM increased N2O flux. Compost and BSM+ compost treatments shifted prokaryotic and fungal community structure relative to urea treatment or controls. No differences in soil function were found based on predicted prokaryotic functional pathways. Compost increased the amount of potential plant pathogens in the soil. Together these results showed that compost fertilizers can change soil microbial communities and nutrient availability in soils, but can also increase the prevalence of pathogenic fungi. Regular additions of high-nitrogen (N) composts to agricultural soils as part of a N fertilizer strategy are thought to be beneficial to the soil microbiome, while intensive, uninterrupted use of synthetic N fertilizers can be detrimental to soil health. Biological indicators of soil health include high microbial richness and diversity, and community composition that favors ecosystem services like efficient N nutrient cycling. Long-term trends have shown that continued, uninterrupted use of synthetic fertilization can negatively impact these factors and reduce soil function, but little is known about the ecological mechanisms behind such shifts. This study investigates treatment effects of organic and synthetic fertilizers on soil bacterial, archaeal and fungal communities, and elucidates how these inputs affect cross-domain microbial interactions. The study was conducted using a repeated measured design where radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea. A molecular barcoding approach of bacterial & archaeal 16S and fungal ITS rDNA marker genes was used to determine treatment effects on microbial richness, community composition and dynamics, network “hub” taxa, and cross-domain microbial interactions. Results showed that a single addition of compost had lasting impacts on soil microbial communities, introduced new organisms into the soil system, and altered network interactions and hub taxa. Single additions of urea did not significantly alter the structure of soil microbial communities but did reduce network complexity and alter hub taxa. This study shows that nitrogen fertilization strategies have important impacts on the soil microbiome, and microbial network analyses can be a powerful tool in determining shifts in soil community ecology that might otherwise be missed when only looking at single metric indicators like richness and diversity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost additions increased radish plant growth compared with the biological and synthetic fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
compost additionse1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the biological and synthetic fertilizer treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“compost additions increased plant growth compared to the biological and synthetic fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased the amount of ammonium leached from the soil.

Treatment
Ureae1
Outcome
amount of ammonium leached from the soile1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Urea increased the amount of ammonium leached from the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased the amount of nitrate leached.

Treatment
composte1
Outcome
amount of nitrate leachede1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“compost increased the amount of nitrate leached”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not increase CO2 flux compared with the control.

Treatment
Treatmentse1
Outcome
CO2 fluxe1
Direction
did not increasee1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treatments did not increase CO2 flux compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to the control, urea treatments increased CH4 flux.

Treatment
urea treatmentse1
Outcome
CH4 fluxe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative to the control, urea treatments increased CH4 flux; and urea, BSM+ urea, and BSM increased N2O flux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to the control, urea increased N2O flux.

Treatment
ureae1
Outcome
N2O fluxe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative to the control, urea treatments increased CH4 flux; and urea, BSM+ urea, and BSM increased N2O flux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to the control, BSM + urea increased N2O flux.

Treatment
BSM+ ureae1
Outcome
N2O fluxe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative to the control, urea treatments increased CH4 flux; and urea, BSM+ urea, and BSM increased N2O flux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to the control, the BSM inoculant increased N2O flux.

Treatment
BSMe1
Outcome
N2O fluxe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative to the control, urea treatments increased CH4 flux; and urea, BSM+ urea, and BSM increased N2O flux”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost shifted prokaryotic and fungal community structure relative to urea treatment or controls.

Treatment
Composte1
Outcome
prokaryotic and fungal community structuree1
Direction
shiftede1
Comparator
urea treatment or controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compost and BSM+ compost treatments shifted prokaryotic and fungal community structure relative to urea treatment or controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BSM + compost shifted prokaryotic and fungal community structure relative to urea treatment or controls.

Treatment
BSM+ composte1
Outcome
prokaryotic and fungal community structuree1
Direction
shiftede1
Comparator
urea treatment or controlse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compost and BSM+ compost treatments shifted prokaryotic and fungal community structure relative to urea treatment or controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No differences in soil function were found based on predicted prokaryotic functional pathways.

Outcome
soil functione1
Direction
No differencese1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“No differences in soil function were found based on predicted prokaryotic functional pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost increased the amount of potential plant pathogens in the soil.

Treatment
Composte1
Interactor
potential plant pathogense1pathogen
Outcome
amount of potential plant pathogens in the soile1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a greenhouse study was conducted using radish plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–548 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compost increased the amount of potential plant pathogens in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single addition of compost had lasting impacts on soil microbial communities.

Treatment
a single addition of composte1
Outcome
lasting impacts on soil microbial communitiese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3240–3357 · show in text ↑
e1

“a single addition of compost had lasting impacts on soil microbial communities, introduced new organisms into the soil system, and altered network interactions and hub taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3631–3803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single addition of compost introduced new organisms into the soil system.

Treatment
a single addition of composte1
Outcome
introduced new organisms into the soil systeme1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3240–3357 · show in text ↑
e1

“a single addition of compost had lasting impacts on soil microbial communities, introduced new organisms into the soil system, and altered network interactions and hub taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3631–3803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single addition of compost altered network interactions and hub taxa.

Treatment
a single addition of composte1
Outcome
network interactions and hub taxae1
Direction
alterede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3240–3357 · show in text ↑
e1

“a single addition of compost had lasting impacts on soil microbial communities, introduced new organisms into the soil system, and altered network interactions and hub taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3631–3803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single additions of urea did not significantly alter the structure of soil microbial communities.

Treatment
Single additions of ureae1
Outcome
structure of soil microbial communitiese1
Direction
did not significantly altere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3240–3357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single additions of urea did not significantly alter the structure of soil microbial communities but did reduce network complexity and alter hub taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3805–3954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single additions of urea reduced network complexity.

Treatment
Single additions of ureae1
Outcome
network complexitye1
Direction
reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3240–3357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single additions of urea did not significantly alter the structure of soil microbial communities but did reduce network complexity and alter hub taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3805–3954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single additions of urea altered hub taxa.

Treatment
Single additions of ureae1
Outcome
hub taxae1
Direction
altere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“radish plants were grown in the same pots for six full crop cycles after single additions of a high-N compost or urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3240–3357 · show in text ↑
e1

“Single additions of urea did not significantly alter the structure of soil microbial communities but did reduce network complexity and alter hub taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3805–3954 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.