Paper · 2019 · Crop Breeding Genetics and Genomics

Breeding Progress in Seedling Resistance against Various Races of Stripe and Leaf Rust in European Bread Wheat

Holger Zetzsche; Albrecht Serfling; Frank Ordon

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Stripe and leaf rust are major constraints of wheat production with substantial impacts on grain yield. Population dynamics of both pathogens and the emergence of new virulent races have resulted in relentless efforts related to wheat breeding to improve resistance during the last decades. Methods: To evaluate the breeding progress achieved with respect to race-specific resistance, a set of nine isolates of the two rust pathogens have been tested in seedling assays on a panel of 191 elite winter wheat cultivars representing wheat breeding in Europe between 1966 and 2013. Results: Significant differences in the resistance of wheat cultivars concerning both pathogens have been detected by means of two-way ANOVA. Isolates as well as genotype × isolate interaction had a significant effect for both pathogens. Breeding progress, resulting in an increased seedling resistance, has been achieved against all nine isolates over the past five decades. The slope of progress was steeper for leaf rust than for stripe rust isolates. Progress against the highly common leaf rust isolate “4171” and” the stripe rust isolate “Warrior(-)” was strongest. Conclusions: The study reveals that a steady increase in seedling resistance was achieved during the past five decades. An additive contribution of these isolate specific R genes after breakdown has been hypothesised.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cultivars differed significantly in resistance to both rust pathogens.

Outcome
resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant differences in the resistance of wheat cultivars concerning both pathogens have been detected by means of two-way ANOVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–730 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates significantly affected resistance to both rust pathogens.

Outcome
significant effect for both pathogense0

Not reportedInteractorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates as well as genotype × isolate interaction had a significant effect for both pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by isolate interaction significantly affected resistance to both pathogens.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
significant effect for both pathogense0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotype × isolate interaction had a significant effect for both pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling resistance increased against all nine isolates over five decades.

Outcome
seedling resistancee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
nine isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased seedling resistance, has been achieved against all nine isolates over the past five decades”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–964 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance progress was steeper for leaf rust than stripe rust isolates.

Outcome
slope of progresse0
Direction
steepere0
Comparator
stripe rust isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slope of progress was steeper for leaf rust than for stripe rust isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance progress was strongest against leaf rust isolate 4171.

Outcome
Progresse0
Direction
strongeste0
Qualifier
leaf rust isolate “4171”e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progress against the highly common leaf rust isolate “4171” and” the stripe rust isolate “Warrior(-)” was strongest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistance progress was strongest against stripe rust isolate Warrior(-).

Outcome
Progresse0
Direction
strongeste0
Qualifier
stripe rust isolate “Warrior(-)”e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progress against the highly common leaf rust isolate “4171” and” the stripe rust isolate “Warrior(-)” was strongest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1160 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesised additive contributions from isolate-specific resistance genes after breakdown.

Gene
isolate specific R genese0
Outcome
An additive contributione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An additive contribution of these isolate specific R genes after breakdown has been hypothesised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑