Abstract
The objective of this work is to propose a chemical management alternative to control Bidens pilosa and Euphorbia heterophylla in genetically modified soybean without affecting grain production and seed germination by using glyphosate applied only once and in mixture, aiming to reduce the number of applications and the amount of herbicides used. The experimental design was randomized blocks with 10 treatments and 4 replications. The soybean used was BRS-Valiosa RR. The treatments consisted of glyphosate and chlorimuron-ethyl applied once and alone (1.5; 2.0 and 80 L or g ha -1 pc), glyphosate in mixture with chlorimuron-ethyl (1.5+10 and 2.0+10 L or g ha -1 pc) and sequentially applied glyphosate (1.5/1.5; 2.0/1.5 and 2.0/1.5/1.5 L ha -1 pc), plus weeded (clean) and non-weeded (dirty) witnesses. The evaluations were: herbicide efficacy in B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, phytotoxicity, density, height and grain yield (kg ha -1 ) in soybean. The production data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance and F test by the SANEST program (P<0.05). It was concluded that the studied species, B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, were controlled by glyphosate at levels above 90%. There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
- Treatment
- glyphosatee0
- Interactor
- B. pilosa
Bidens pilosae0weed - Outcome
- B. pilosae0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- above 90%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the studied species, B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, were controlled by glyphosate at levels above 90%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
- Treatment
- glyphosatee0
- Interactor
- E. heterophylla
Euphorbia heterophyllae0weed
- Outcome
- E. heterophyllae0
- Direction
- controllede0
- Value
- above 90%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the studied species, B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, were controlled by glyphosate at levels above 90%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Outcome
- visual injurye0
- Direction
- noe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean production showed no significant decrease.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- no significant decreasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Outcome
- germinatione0
- Direction
- no significant decreasee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · Bidens pilosa · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
glyphosate · Euphorbia heterophylla · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.