Paper · 2019 · American Journal of BioScience

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this work is to propose a chemical management alternative to control Bidens pilosa and Euphorbia heterophylla in genetically modified soybean without affecting grain production and seed germination by using glyphosate applied only once and in mixture, aiming to reduce the number of applications and the amount of herbicides used. The experimental design was randomized blocks with 10 treatments and 4 replications. The soybean used was BRS-Valiosa RR. The treatments consisted of glyphosate and chlorimuron-ethyl applied once and alone (1.5; 2.0 and 80 L or g ha -1 pc), glyphosate in mixture with chlorimuron-ethyl (1.5+10 and 2.0+10 L or g ha -1 pc) and sequentially applied glyphosate (1.5/1.5; 2.0/1.5 and 2.0/1.5/1.5 L ha -1 pc), plus weeded (clean) and non-weeded (dirty) witnesses. The evaluations were: herbicide efficacy in B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, phytotoxicity, density, height and grain yield (kg ha -1 ) in soybean. The production data obtained were subjected to analysis of variance and F test by the SANEST program (P<0.05). It was concluded that the studied species, B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, were controlled by glyphosate at levels above 90%. There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
B. pilosaBidens pilosae0weed
Outcome
B. pilosae0
Direction
controllede0
Value
above 90%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bidens pilosa
Bidens pilosa · InteractorWiki Farazi · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the studied species, B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, were controlled by glyphosate at levels above 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Interactor
E. heterophyllaEuphorbia heterophyllae0weed
Outcome
E. heterophyllae0
Direction
controllede0
Value
above 90%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia heterophylla
Euphorbia heterophylla · InteractorPsumuseum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the studied species, B. pilosa and E. heterophylla, were controlled by glyphosate at levels above 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
visual injurye0
Direction
noe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · Bidens pilosa · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · Euphorbia heterophylla · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.