Abstract
Abstract Field experiments were conducted during 2017 seasons study the effect of tillage, water regimes and weed management methods on weeds and transplanted rice. The design was split plot with combinations of tillage and water regimes as main plot treatments and weed management methods as subplot treatments. The weed biomass was significantly reduced and the rice performance was superior under intensive tillage (three ploughings followed by (fb) puddling), when compared to the conventional farmers practice of land preparation. Among the water regimes, continuous deep water ponding (> 7.5 cm water) either till panicle initiation or grain filling stage suppressed weed growth better than that under the recommended practice of maintaining about 5 cm water level with intermittent drainage. Weed control efficiency (WCE) was maximum under azimsulfuron 35 g/ha applied at 15 days after transplanting (DAT), followed by pre-plant application of oxyflourfen fb one hand weeding at 20 DAT.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive tillage reduced weed biomass versus conventional farmer land preparation.
Verbatim
e0“The weed biomass was significantly reduced and the rice performance was superior under intensive tillage (three ploughings followed by (fb) puddling), when compared to the conventional farmers practice of land preparation.”
t0“weeds and transplanted rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive tillage yielded superior rice performance versus conventional preparation.
Verbatim
e0“The weed biomass was significantly reduced and the rice performance was superior under intensive tillage (three ploughings followed by (fb) puddling), when compared to the conventional farmers practice of land preparation.”
t0“transplanted rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep continuous ponding until panicle initiation suppressed weed growth better than recommended intermittent drainage.
Verbatim
e0“continuous deep water ponding (> 7.5 cm water) either till panicle initiation or grain filling stage suppressed weed growth better than that under the recommended practice of maintaining about 5 cm water level with intermittent drainage.”
t0“weeds and transplanted rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep continuous ponding until grain filling suppressed weed growth better than recommended intermittent drainage.
Verbatim
e0“continuous deep water ponding (> 7.5 cm water) either till panicle initiation or grain filling stage suppressed weed growth better than that under the recommended practice of maintaining about 5 cm water level with intermittent drainage.”
t0“weeds and transplanted rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Azimsulfuron at 15 DAT produced maximum weed control efficiency.
Verbatim
e0“Weed control efficiency (WCE) was maximum under azimsulfuron 35 g/ha applied at 15 days after transplanting (DAT), followed by pre-plant application of oxyflourfen fb one hand weeding at 20 DAT.”
t0“weeds and transplanted rice”
The same questions in other papers
azimsulfuron · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
32 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →tillage · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
82 papers more in this group
See all 86 papers →tillage · organism · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
142 papers more in this group
See all 146 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.