Paper · 2019 · Agronomy Journal

Agronomic Responses of Maize Hybrids to Row Spacing and Plant Population in the Summer and Winter Seasons in Brazil

Fagner Souto Dias; Wemerson Mendonça Rezende; Leandro Tonello Zuffo; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter. The additional maize produced in the winter and the high‐yielding opportunities in the summer season make it important to understand responses of maize hybrids to row spacing and plant population across the two annual Brazilian growing seasons. In the 2015 to 2016 summer season and the 2016 winter season, maize response to plant population, ranging from 60,000 to 90,000 plants ha −1 , was evaluated for three hybrids in 0.45‐, 0.60‐, 0.75‐, and 0.90‐m row spacing. Plant architecture traits, grain yield and yield components did not differ with row spacing, and their responses to plant population were not affected by hybrid type and/or row spacing. The DKB390PRO2 hybrid (single cross) demonstrated better grain yield performance in the summer, whereas the BG7049YH hybrid (three‐way cross) had the highest yield in the winter. Plant and ear height increased linearly in response to plant population in the summer season, whereas other plant architecture traits, ear leaf chlorophyll concentration, and grain yield components decreased linearly with increasing plant populations in both seasons. There was a quadratic response in maize grain yield to plant population, and it was maximized with 78,688 plants ha −1 in the summer, and 71,206 plants ha −1 in the winter. Our results show preliminary evidence that regardless of row spacing, maize grain yield can be maximized with DKB390 hybrid (single cross) with 78,500 plants ha −1 in the summer, and BG7049YH hybrid (three‐way) with 71,000 plants ha −1 in the winter season. Core Ideas Regardless of summer or winter seasons, hybrid performance was not affected by row spacing. Maize hybrids exhibited similar yield responses to row spacing and plant population. Most of the yield components and plant architecture traits decreased linearly with increasing plant population. The maximum grain yield occurring at lower plant population (71,000 plants ha −1 ) in the winter than in the summer season (78,500 plants ha −1 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant architecture traits, grain yield and yield components of maize did not differ with row spacing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
row spacinge1
Outcome
Plant architecture traits, grain yield and yield componentse1
Direction
did not differe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant architecture traits, grain yield and yield components did not differ with row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–646 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Responses of maize to plant population were not affected by hybrid type or row spacing.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plant populatione2
Outcome
responses to plant populatione2
Direction
not affectede2
Qualifier
by hybrid type and/or row spacinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“their responses to plant population were not affected by hybrid type and/or row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–739 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DKB390PRO2 hybrid (single cross) had better grain yield performance in summer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
DKB390PRO2 hybrid (single cross)e3
Outcome
grain yield performancee3
Setting
summere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e3

“The DKB390PRO2 hybrid (single cross) demonstrated better grain yield performance in the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–835 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BG7049YH hybrid (three-way cross) had the highest grain yield in winter.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
BG7049YH hybrid (three‐way cross)e4
Outcome
yielde4
Qualifier
had the higheste4
Setting
wintere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“the BG7049YH hybrid (three‐way cross) had the highest yield in the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant and ear height of maize increased linearly with plant population in the summer season.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plant populatione5
Outcome
Plant and ear heighte5
Direction
increased linearlye5
Setting
summer seasone5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plant and ear height increased linearly in response to plant population in the summer season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other plant architecture traits, ear leaf chlorophyll concentration and grain yield components of maize decreased linearly with increasing plant population in both seasons.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
increasing plant populationse6
Outcome
other plant architecture traits, ear leaf chlorophyll concentration, and grain yield componentse6
Direction
decreased linearlye6
Setting
both seasonse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“other plant architecture traits, ear leaf chlorophyll concentration, and grain yield components decreased linearly with increasing plant populations in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was maximized at 78,688 plants ha -1 in the summer season under a quadratic response to plant population.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plant populatione7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
maximizede7
Value
78,688 plants ha −1e7
Qualifier
quadratic responsee7
Setting
summere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a quadratic response in maize grain yield to plant population, and it was maximized with 78,688 plants ha −1 in the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield was maximized at 71,206 plants ha -1 in the winter season under a quadratic response to plant population.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plant populatione7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
maximizede7
Value
71,206 plants ha −1e6
Qualifier
quadratic responsee7
Setting
wintere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brazil has two growing seasons for maize ( Zea mays L.) production: summer and winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was a quadratic response in maize grain yield to plant population, and it was maximized with 78,688 plants ha −1 in the summer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1320 · show in text ↑
e6

“71,206 plants ha −1 in the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1359 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

654 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.