Abstract
Two field experiments were carried out in Sers El – Lian Research Station (A.R.C) Menofyia Governorate, Egypt in 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 seasons to investigate the effect of three sowing dates of wheat with sugar beet, four intercropping patterns and three nitrogen fertilizer levels on competitive relationships, yield advantage and cereal units of wheat with sugar beet. A split – split plot design with three replications was used. The most import results can be summarized as follows: The highest value of land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.36 was obtained when sowing wheat with sugar beet at the first irrigation and intercropping patterns (100% sugar beet + 33.3% wheat) in ridges at 120 Kg N/fed (D2 × S3 × N3) in combined analysis of two seasons. The best results for relative crowding coefficient (K) was (15.12) achieved with wheat planting at second irrigation of sugar beet with intercropping pattern (100% + 25%) sugar beet/wheat in ridges (60 cm wide) and fertilized by 100 Kg N/fed (D3 × S1 × N2) in combined analysis of the two seasons. Combined data over two seasons of aggressivity (A) revealed that wheat was the dominant component and sugar beet was dominated in combined analysis. Aggressivity values were increased with wheat planting at first irrigation of sugar beet under combination between different intercropping pattern and nitrogen fertilizer rates the highest values (0.62) was obtained at first irrigation of sugar beet with intercropping pattern (100% sugar beet + 25% wheat) on beds and 80 or 100 Kg N/fed (D2 × S2 × N1 or N2). Whereas, the lowest values (0.17) of A were showed with the second irrigation of sugar beet with two factors (D3 × S3 × N3).The highest values of cereal units (113.80)/fed was obtained when wheat just before the first irrigation of sugar beet and intercropping pattern (100% sugar beet + 33.3% wheat) in ridges and 120 Kg N/fed (D2 × S3 × N3). in combined analysis of two seasons. While the lowest one (97.76) cereal unit/fed was obtained with sugar beet at the same irrigation with intercropping pattern (100% sugar beet + 33.3% wheat) on beds and 80 Kg N/fed (D1 × S4 × N1).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum land equivalent ratio was 1.36 under the stated planting and fertilizer combination.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 120 Kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio (LER)e0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1.36e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest value of land equivalent ratio (LER) 1.36 was obtained when sowing wheat with sugar beet at the first irrigation and intercropping patterns (100% sugar beet + 33.3% wheat) in ridges at 120 Kg N/fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Relative crowding coefficient reached 15.12 under second-irrigation wheat planting with the stated intercrop and nitrogen rate.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 100 Kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- relative crowding coefficient (K)e0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 15.12e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best results for relative crowding coefficient (K) was (15.12) achieved with wheat planting at second irrigation of sugar beet with intercropping pattern (100% + 25%) sugar beet/wheat in ridges (60 cm wide) and fertilized by 100 Kg N/fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat was the dominant component and sugar beet the dominated component.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- dominant componente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wheat was the dominant component and sugar beet was dominated”
Claim · model-written summary
Aggressivity was highest at 0.62 under first irrigation and the stated planting and nitrogen combinations.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 80 or 100 Kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- highest valuese0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 0.62e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest values (0.62) was obtained at first irrigation of sugar beet with intercropping pattern (100% sugar beet + 25% wheat) on beds and 80 or 100 Kg N/fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Aggressivity was lowest at 0.17 under the second irrigation combination.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest values (0.17) of A were showed with the second irrigation of sugar beet with two factors (D3 × S3 × N3)”
t0“wheat – sugar beet”
Claim · model-written summary
Cereal units were highest at 113.80 per fed under the stated first-irrigation intercrop and nitrogen combination.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 120 Kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- cereal unitse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 113.80)/fede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest values of cereal units (113.80)/fed was obtained when wheat just before the first irrigation of sugar beet and intercropping pattern (100% sugar beet + 33.3% wheat) in ridges and 120 Kg N/fed”
Claim · model-written summary
Cereal units were lowest at 97.76 per fed under the stated bed intercrop and nitrogen combination.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 80 Kg N/fede0
- Outcome
- cereal unit/fede0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 97.76e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the lowest one (97.76) cereal unit/fed was obtained with sugar beet at the same irrigation with intercropping pattern (100% sugar beet + 33.3% wheat) on beds and 80 Kg N/fed”
t0“wheat – sugar beet”