Observationmodel-written summary

Relative crowding coefficient reached 15.12 under second-irrigation wheat planting with the stated intercrop and nitrogen rate.

A claim from Integrated crop managements through optimal planting date and nitrogen fertilizer levels in wheat – sugar beet association on competitive relationships and yield advantages · 2017

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative crowding coefficient reached 15.12 under second-irrigation wheat planting with the stated intercrop and nitrogen rate.

Treatment
100 Kg N/fede0
Outcome
relative crowding coefficient (K)e0
Direction
beste0
Value
15.12e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best results for relative crowding coefficient (K) was (15.12) achieved with wheat planting at second irrigation of sugar beet with intercropping pattern (100% + 25%) sugar beet/wheat in ridges (60 cm wide) and fertilized by 100 Kg N/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–992

Title

Integrated crop managements through optimal planting date and nitrogen fertilizer levels in wheat – sugar beet association on competitive relationships and yield advantages

Kamel Badr Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2017. doi:10.21608/assjm.2017.56859

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-7166d766dc0b2bf52c7be080e530ed6e52444e1ae06d30c8a0ea515505c35bb3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer