Paper · 1932 · Journal of Forestry

Some Further Relations of Fire to Longleaf Pine

H. H. Chapman

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Professor Chapman has long studied the influence of fire on the reproduction of longleaf pine. In this article he distinguishes between (1) burning preceding seeding and subsequent complete or periodic protection and (2) complete protection before and after seeding. His experiments convince him that the ground must be freed of competing material prior to seed fall by means of fire but that annual burning subsequent to seeding is highly detrimental. His experiments on intermittent burning and protection at two- to three-year intervals after seeding and prior to the start of height growth are not completed, but they indicate some value in bringing about conditions favorable to healthy height growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ground must be freed of competing material before seed fall by means of fire in longleaf pine.

Taxon
Longleaf PinePinus palustrist0
Treatment
firee1
Outcome
competing materiale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus palustris
Pinus palustris · TaxonChuck Bargeron, University of Georgia · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Longleaf Pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“His experiments convince him that the ground must be freed of competing material prior to seed fall by means of fire”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual burning after seeding is highly detrimental to longleaf pine reproduction.

Taxon
Longleaf PinePinus palustrist0
Treatment
annual burning subsequent to seedinge2
Outcome
reproductione0
Direction
highly detrimentale2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus palustris
Pinus palustris · TaxonChuck Bargeron, University of Georgia · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Longleaf Pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
e0

“influence of fire on the reproduction of longleaf pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“annual burning subsequent to seeding is highly detrimental”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–460 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intermittent burning and protection at two- to three-year intervals after seeding may favour healthy height growth in longleaf pine; these experiments are not completed.

Taxon
Longleaf PinePinus palustrist0
Treatment
intermittent burning and protection at two- to three-year intervals after seedinge3
Outcome
healthy height growthe3
Direction
favorablee3
Qualifier
not completede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus palustris
Pinus palustris · TaxonChuck Bargeron, University of Georgia · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Longleaf Pine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–47 · show in text ↑
e3

“His experiments on intermittent burning and protection at two- to three-year intervals after seeding and prior to the start of height growth are not completed, but they indicate some value in bringing about conditions favorable to healthy height growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–714 · show in text ↑

fire · pest · Pinus palustris (longleaf pine)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fire · growth · Pinus palustris (longleaf pine)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.