Paper · 2010 · Journal of plant protection sciences

Evaluation of insecticidal schedules for the management of insect pests of potato.

Palash Mondal; Amitava Konar; Niranjan Singh

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

1 2 3 Palash Mondal , Amitava Konar and N. Johnson Singh 1 2&3 Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Viswa-Bharati, Sriniketan-731 236, Birbhum, West Bengal. Department of Agricultural Entomology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur-741252, Nadia, West Bengal, India E-mail: konar_amitava@rediffmail.com Two year's field study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of five treatments against insect pests of potato. The minimum population of aphids, whitefly and epilachna beetle was observed in the treatment T which received soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloride, respectively at 40, 55 and 70 DAP than other treatments. Maximum yield of healty potato tuber was recorded in the plot treated with chlorpyriphos before planting and foliar spray of acephate, imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos + cypermethrin at 40, 55 and 70 DAP (T ). Yield of damaged tuber caused by soil pests was found maximum in control plot and it was recorded lowest in T treatment which received soil application of phorate 10G at 40 DAP and foliar spray with imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos + cypermethrin at 55 and 70 DAP, respectively. But soil application of phorate at planting followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, azadirachtin and Bt (T ) was not as effective as T . 1

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phorate then chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloride schedule produced the lowest aphid population among treatments.

Treatment
soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloridee0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
population of aphidse0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum population of aphids, whitefly and epilachna beetle was observed in the treatment T which received soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloride, respectively at 40, 55 and 70 DAP than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same phorate based schedule gave the lowest whitefly population among treatments.

Treatment
soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloridee0
Interactor
whiteflye0pest
Outcome
whiteflye0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum population of aphids, whitefly and epilachna beetle was observed in the treatment T which received soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloride, respectively at 40, 55 and 70 DAP than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same phorate based schedule gave the lowest epilachna beetle population among treatments.

Treatment
soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloridee0
Interactor
epilachna beetlee0pest
Outcome
epilachna beetlee0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum population of aphids, whitefly and epilachna beetle was observed in the treatment T which received soil application of phorate followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, imadicloprid and cartap hydrochloride, respectively at 40, 55 and 70 DAP than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–700 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos before planting followed by acephate, imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos plus cypermethrin gave the maximum healthy potato tuber yield.

Treatment
chlorpyriphos before planting and foliar spray of acephate, imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos + cypermethrine0
Outcome
yield of healty potato tubere0
Direction
Maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum yield of healty potato tuber was recorded in the plot treated with chlorpyriphos before planting and foliar spray of acephate, imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos + cypermethrin at 40, 55 and 70 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest soil pest damaged tuber yield.

Interactor
soil pestse0pest
Outcome
Yield of damaged tuber caused by soil pestse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of damaged tuber caused by soil pests was found maximum in control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phorate at 40 DAP followed by imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos plus cypermethrin at 55 and 70 DAP gave the lowest soil pest damaged tuber yield.

Treatment
soil application of phorate 10G at 40 DAP and foliar spray with imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos + cypermethrin at 55 and 70 DAPe0
Interactor
soil pestse1pest
Outcome
Yield of damaged tuber caused by soil pestse1
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
control plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was recorded lowest in T treatment which received soil application of phorate 10G at 40 DAP and foliar spray with imadichloprid and chlorpyriphos + cypermethrin at 55 and 70 DAP, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of damaged tuber caused by soil pests was found maximum in control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phorate at planting followed by chlorpyriphos, azadirachtin and Bt was less effective than the referenced treatment.

Treatment
soil application of phorate at planting followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, azadirachtin and Bte0
Outcome
not as effectivee0
Direction
not as effectivee0
Comparator
Te0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of phorate at planting followed by spraying of chlorpyriphos, azadirachtin and Bt (T ) was not as effective as T”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑

cypermethrin · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

phorate · Aphidomorpha · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chlorpyrifos · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chlorpyrifos · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phorate · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

chlorpyrifos · Aphidomorpha · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Aphidomorpha · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.