Abstract
The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of gradual water deficit stress on some phonological and morphological traits and grain yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars. This study was carried out in 2007 and 2008, to evaluate responses of three chickpea cultivars (Hashem and Arman from kabuli and Pirooz from desi type) under well watering (I1: 70mm evaporation from class A pan), gradual water deficit (I2 and I3:70→90→110→130 and 70→100→130mm evaporation from class A pan, respectively) and severe water stress (I4:130mm evaporation from class A pan). Result showed that days to flowering and plant height were decreased, as water limitation increased. This reduction was significant under gradual water stress (I2 and I3) and severe water deficit (I4), compared with control (I1). There were no significant differences in grain filling period and grain yield among I1, I2 and I3 irrigation treatments. No significant differences in days to physiologic maturity and number of sub branches were recorded among irrigation treatments. Interactions of year × cultivar for days to physiologic maturity, grain filling period and grain yield (P≤0.01) and for days to flowering and plant height (P≤0.05) were significant. The superiority of Arman in producing comparatively greater grain yield could be attributed to higher grain filling period of this cultivar in both years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Days to flowering and plant height decreased as water limitation increased; the reduction was significant under gradual and severe water deficit compared with control (I1).
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume0 - Treatment
- gradual water deficit stresse0
- Outcome
- days to flowering and plant heighte1
- Direction
- decreasede1
- Qualifier
- as water limitation increasede1
- Comparator
- control (I1)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of Gradual Water Deficit Stress on Phenological and Morphological Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of gradual water deficit stress on some phonological and morphological traits and grain yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars”
e1“Result showed that days to flowering and plant height were decreased, as water limitation increased”
e2“This reduction was significant under gradual water stress (I2 and I3) and severe water deficit (I4), compared with control (I1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain filling period and grain yield did not differ significantly among the I1, I2 and I3 irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation treatmentse3
- Outcome
- grain filling period and grain yielde3
- Direction
- no significant differencese3
- Comparator
- I1e3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of Gradual Water Deficit Stress on Phenological and Morphological Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of gradual water deficit stress on some phonological and morphological traits and grain yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars”
e3“There were no significant differences in grain filling period and grain yield among I1, I2 and I3 irrigation treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Days to physiologic maturity and number of sub branches did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Treatment
- irrigation treatmentse4
- Outcome
- days to physiologic maturity and number of sub branchese4
- Direction
- No significant differencese4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of Gradual Water Deficit Stress on Phenological and Morphological Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of gradual water deficit stress on some phonological and morphological traits and grain yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars”
e4“No significant differences in days to physiologic maturity and number of sub branches were recorded among irrigation treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The year × cultivar interaction was significant for days to physiologic maturity, grain filling period and grain yield (P≤0.01).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- cultivare5
- Outcome
- days to physiologic maturity, grain filling period and grain yielde5
- Value
- P≤0.01e5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of Gradual Water Deficit Stress on Phenological and Morphological Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of gradual water deficit stress on some phonological and morphological traits and grain yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars”
e5“Interactions of year × cultivar for days to physiologic maturity, grain filling period and grain yield (P≤0.01) and for days to flowering and plant height (P≤0.05) were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
The year × cultivar interaction was significant for days to flowering and plant height (P≤0.05).
- Taxon
- chickpeaCicer arietinume0
- Material
- cultivare5
- Outcome
- days to flowering and plant heighte5
- Value
- P≤0.05e5
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of Gradual Water Deficit Stress on Phenological and Morphological Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e0“The aims of this study were to investigate the effect of gradual water deficit stress on some phonological and morphological traits and grain yield of desi and kabuli chickpea cultivars”
e5“Interactions of year × cultivar for days to physiologic maturity, grain filling period and grain yield (P≤0.01) and for days to flowering and plant height (P≤0.05) were significant”
Claim · model-written summary
The superiority of Arman in grain yield could be attributed to its higher grain filling period in both years.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Material
- Armane6
- Outcome
- grain yielde6
- Qualifier
- higher grain filling periode6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Effects of Gradual Water Deficit Stress on Phenological and Morphological Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
e6“The superiority of Arman in producing comparatively greater grain yield could be attributed to higher grain filling period of this cultivar in both years”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 113 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.