Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Effects of Biochar Combined with Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction on Rapeseed Yield and Soil Aggregate Stability in Upland of Purple Soils

Xiaoqin Tian; Zhuo Li; Longchang Wang; et al.

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Reduction of soil fertility and production efficiency resulting from excessive application of chemical fertilizers is universal in rapeseed-growing fields. The main objective of our study was to assess the effects of biochar combined with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on soil aggregate stability and rapeseed yield and to identify the relationship between yield and soil aggregate stability. A two-factor field experiment (2017–2019) was conducted with biochar (0 (C0), 10 (C10), 20 (C20) and 40 t·ha−1 (C40)) and nitrogen fertilizer (180 (N100), 144 (N80) and 108 kg N·ha−1 (N60)). Experimental results indicated that under N100 and N80 treatments, C10 significantly increased the macro-aggregates (R0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil water stable aggregate by 14.28%–15.85%, 14.88%–17.08% and 36.26%–42.22%, respectively, compared with C0. Besides, the overall difference of the soil water-stable aggregate content in 2–5 mm size range among nitrogen treatments was significant under the application of C10, which increased by 17.04%–33.04% compared with C0. Total organic carbon (TOC) in R0.25 of soil mechanical-stable aggregates was basically all increased after biochar application, especially in 0.25–1 mm and 1–2 mm aggregates, and had an increasing trend with biochar increase. C10 significantly increased rapeseed yield by 22.08%–45.65% in 2019, compared with C0. However, the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer reduced the two-year average rapeseed yield, which decreased by 11.67%–31.67% compared with N100. The highest yield of rapeseed was obtained by N100C10 in two consecutive years, which had no statistical difference with N80C10. However, the two-year yields of N80C10 were all higher than those of N100C0 with increase rate of 16.11%, and which would reduce 35.43% nitrogen fertilizer in the case of small yield difference, compared with the highest yield (2.67 t·ha−1) calculated by multi-dimensional nonlinear regression models. The regression analysis indicated R0.25, MWD and GMD had the strong positive associations with rapeseed yield, whereas percentage of aggregate destruction (PAD0.25) had a significant negative correlation with rapeseed yield. This study suggests that the application of biochar into upland purple soil could improve soil structure, increase the content of TOC in macro-aggregates under nitrogen fertilizer reduction as well as replace part of nitrogen fertilizer to achieve relatively high rapeseed yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C10 under N100 and N80 significantly increased soil macro-aggregates by 14.28%–15.85% relative to C0.

Treatment
C10e0
Outcome
macro-aggregates (R0.25)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.28%–15.85%e0
Comparator
C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“under N100 and N80 treatments, C10 significantly increased the macro-aggregates (R0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil water stable aggregate by 14.28%–15.85%, 14.88%–17.08% and 36.26%–42.22%, respectively, compared with C0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C10 under N100 and N80 increased soil aggregate mean weight diameter by 14.88%–17.08% relative to C0.

Treatment
C10e0
Outcome
mean weight diameter (MWD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.88%–17.08%e0
Comparator
C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“under N100 and N80 treatments, C10 significantly increased the macro-aggregates (R0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil water stable aggregate by 14.28%–15.85%, 14.88%–17.08% and 36.26%–42.22%, respectively, compared with C0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C10 under N100 and N80 increased soil aggregate geometric mean diameter by 36.26%–42.22% relative to C0.

Treatment
C10e0
Outcome
geometric mean diameter (GMD)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
36.26%–42.22%e0
Comparator
C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“under N100 and N80 treatments, C10 significantly increased the macro-aggregates (R0.25), mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil water stable aggregate by 14.28%–15.85%, 14.88%–17.08% and 36.26%–42.22%, respectively, compared with C0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under C10, nitrogen treatments differed significantly in 2–5 mm water-stable aggregate content, which increased 17.04%–33.04% relative to C0.

Treatment
C10e0
Outcome
soil water-stable aggregate content in 2–5 mm size rangee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.04%–33.04%e0
Comparator
C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the overall difference of the soil water-stable aggregate content in 2–5 mm size range among nitrogen treatments was significant under the application of C10, which increased by 17.04%–33.04% compared with C0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application generally increased total organic carbon in soil mechanical-stable aggregates, especially 0.25–1 mm and 1–2 mm aggregates, with an increasing trend as biochar increased.

Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
Total organic carbon (TOC) in R0.25 of soil mechanical-stable aggregatese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
especially in 0.25–1 mm and 1–2 mm aggregatese0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Total organic carbon (TOC) in R0.25 of soil mechanical-stable aggregates was basically all increased after biochar application, especially in 0.25–1 mm and 1–2 mm aggregates, and had an increasing trend with biochar increase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C10 significantly increased rapeseed yield by 22.08%–45.65% in 2019 relative to C0.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
C10e0
Outcome
rapeseed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.08%–45.65%e0
Comparator
C0e0

Verbatim

e0

“C10 significantly increased rapeseed yield by 22.08%–45.65% in 2019, compared with C0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased two-year mean rapeseed yield by 11.67%–31.67% relative to N100.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
reduction of nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
two-year average rapeseed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.67%–31.67%e0
Comparator
N100e0

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer reduced the two-year average rapeseed yield, which decreased by 11.67%–31.67% compared with N100.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1559 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N100C10 gave the highest rapeseed yield in both years.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
N100C10e0
Outcome
yield of rapeseede0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of rapeseed was obtained by N100C10 in two consecutive years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1638 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under N100C10 was not statistically different from N80C10.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
N100C10e0
Outcome
yield of rapeseede0
Direction
no statistical differencee0
Comparator
N80C10e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield of rapeseed was obtained by N100C10 in two consecutive years, which had no statistical difference with N80C10.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1688 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N80C10 yielded 16.11% more than N100C0 over two years.

Treatment
N80C10e0
Outcome
two-year yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.11%e0
Comparator
N100C0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the two-year yields of N80C10 were all higher than those of N100C0 with increase rate of 16.11%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1793 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The regression model indicated a highest yield of 2.67 t·ha−1 with a 35.43% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer.

Outcome
highest yielde0
Value
2.67 t·ha−1e0
Qualifier
35.43% nitrogen fertilizere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“would reduce 35.43% nitrogen fertilizer in the case of small yield difference, compared with the highest yield (2.67 t·ha−1) calculated by multi-dimensional nonlinear regression models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1989 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil macro-aggregate content, mean weight diameter and geometric mean diameter were strongly positively associated with rapeseed yield.

Outcome
rapeseed yielde0
Qualifier
R0.25, MWD and GMDe0

Not reportedTaxonSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“R0.25, MWD and GMD had the strong positive associations with rapeseed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2025–2100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aggregate destruction percentage was significantly negatively correlated with rapeseed yield.

Outcome
rapeseed yielde0
Qualifier
percentage of aggregate destruction (PAD0.25)e0

Not reportedTaxonSettingDirection

Verbatim

e0

“percentage of aggregate destruction (PAD0.25) had a significant negative correlation with rapeseed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2214 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest biochar in upland purple soil can improve soil structure and macro-aggregate carbon under nitrogen reduction while partly replacing fertilizer to maintain relatively high rapeseed yield.

Taxon
rapeseede0
Treatment
application of biochare0
Outcome
relatively high rapeseed yielde0

Verbatim

e0

“the application of biochar into upland purple soil could improve soil structure, increase the content of TOC in macro-aggregates under nitrogen fertilizer reduction as well as replace part of nitrogen fertilizer to achieve relatively high rapeseed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2241–2494 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

378 papers: 337 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 337 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

374 papers more in this group

See all 378 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.