Paper · 2006 · Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository)

Pest and disease management system for supporting winter oilseed rape decisions (PASSWORD) - vaildation phase (HGCA Project Report No. 390)

P. Gladders; Cheryl A. Dyer; Bruce D.L. Fitt; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pests and particularly diseases cause serious loss of yield and quality in winter oilseed rape estimated to exceed £80 million/annum in some years. These losses have occurred despite an annual expenditure of about £3.5 million for insecticides and £12 million on fungicides. Decision-making is difficult because there is complex spatial and temporal variation in pest and disease problems and improved guidance is required. The main objective of this project was to test new disease models developed in the first phase of this project and deliver a decision support system for both pest and disease control in oilseed rape. The regional light leaf spot forecast is well-established and reliable and indicates an increased risk of this disease in spring 2006. A new regional forecast for stem canker incidence preharvest has been developed and made available on the Internet. It was successful in 2004/05 and offers strategic guidance on risk provided weather factors are within the range used to develop the model. A four-stage crop-specific stem canker risk assessment method was developed that predicts the onset of phoma leaf spotting using post-harvest weather data and thermal time relationships for canker development and canker severity. Yield loss can then be calculated from canker severity and the economic impact of stem canker predicted. There is some flexibility in the timing of fungicide sprays to control stem canker. Delays of 2 to 3 weeks beyond a 10-20% plants affected threshold did not adversely affect yield. Stem canker severity and yield of different cultivars showed large variation between years and sites and smaller, but significant, variation in responses to fungicide. When phoma leaf spot appears in late autumn, it is only when plants are small that stem canker is likely to cause yield loss. In commercial crops, there were consistent trends for higher yields to be associated with higher fungicide inputs. Light leaf spot was very difficult to control with fungicides in the Aberdeen area where use of resistant cultivars is essential. The most effective disease control was obtained using a combination of resistant cultivars and fungicides. In some years, responses to fungicides were not cost-effective and targeting their use to high-risk situations is necessary to give the best margins over input costs. Close contact was maintained with potential users during the project and they influenced priorities and design features. The components of PASSWORD decision support system were tested and provide guidance for the management of invertebrate pests, phoma stem canker and light leaf spot. The system will be available to ArableDS for use in autumn 2006.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The regional light leaf spot forecast was reliable and indicated increased disease risk in spring 2006.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
light leaf spot forecaste0
Value
increased riske0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The regional light leaf spot forecast is well-established and reliable and indicates an increased risk of this disease in spring 2006.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A regional forecast for preharvest stem canker incidence was developed, made available online, and was successful in 2004/05.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
stem canker incidence preharveste0
Value
successful in 2004/05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A new regional forecast for stem canker incidence preharvest has been developed and made available on the Internet. It was successful in 2004/05”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A four-stage crop-specific method predicts phoma leaf spotting onset, canker severity, yield loss and economic impact.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
stem canker risk assessmente0
Value
four-stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A four-stage crop-specific stem canker risk assessment method was developed that predicts the onset of phoma leaf spotting using post-harvest weather data and thermal time relationships for canker development and canker severity. Yield loss can then be calculated from canker severity and the economic impact of stem canker predicted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying fungicide sprays 2 to 3 weeks beyond the 10-20% plant threshold did not adversely affect yield.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
Delays of 2 to 3 weekse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not adversely affecte0
Comparator
10-20% plants affected thresholde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delays of 2 to 3 weeks beyond a 10-20% plants affected threshold did not adversely affect yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem canker severity varied greatly between years and sites.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
Stem canker severitye0
Direction
large variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem canker severity and yield of different cultivars showed large variation between years and sites and smaller, but significant, variation in responses to fungicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of different cultivars varied greatly between years and sites.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
large variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem canker severity and yield of different cultivars showed large variation between years and sites and smaller, but significant, variation in responses to fungicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar responses to fungicide varied significantly.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
responses to fungicidee0
Direction
variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“smaller, but significant, variation in responses to fungicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1636–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late-autumn phoma leaf spot was associated with yield loss from stem canker only in small plants.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Organ / stage
plants are smalle0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Qualifier
late autumne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When phoma leaf spot appears in late autumn, it is only when plants are small that stem canker is likely to cause yield loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1699–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fungicide input was consistently associated with higher yields in commercial crops.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
fungicide inputse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Setting
commercial cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In commercial crops, there were consistent trends for higher yields to be associated with higher fungicide inputs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1825–1939 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide control of light leaf spot was very difficult in the Aberdeen area.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
Light leaf spote0
Direction
very difficult to controle0
Setting
Aberdeen areae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light leaf spot was very difficult to control with fungicides in the Aberdeen area where use of resistant cultivars is essential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining resistant cultivars and fungicides gave the most effective disease control.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Treatment
combination of resistant cultivars and fungicidese0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective disease control was obtained using a combination of resistant cultivars and fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2070–2176 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some years, fungicide responses were not cost effective.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
responses to fungicidese0
Qualifier
In some yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In some years, responses to fungicides were not cost-effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2177–2239 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend resistant cultivars for light leaf spot control in the Aberdeen area.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
use of resistant cultivars is essentiale0
Setting
Aberdeen areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light leaf spot was very difficult to control with fungicides in the Aberdeen area where use of resistant cultivars is essential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2069 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend targeting fungicides to high-risk situations for the best margins over input costs.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
targeting their use to high-risk situationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“targeting their use to high-risk situations is necessary to give the best margins over input costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2244–2343 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested PASSWORD components provide guidance on invertebrate pests, phoma stem canker and light leaf spot management.

Taxon
winter oilseed rapeBrassica napust0
Outcome
guidance for the management of invertebrate pests, phoma stem canker and light leaf spote0
Value
testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The components of PASSWORD decision support system were tested and provide guidance for the management of invertebrate pests, phoma stem canker and light leaf spot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2465–2629 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter oilseed rape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 · show in text ↑

fungicide · control · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fungicide · disease · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.