Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Bradyrhizobium co-inoculation enhances nitrogen fixation and growth of green grams (Vigna radiata L.) under water stress

Daniel Mumo Musyoka; Ezekiel Mugendi Njeru; Methuselah Mang’erere Nyamwange; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wildzek) is a neglected crop with great potential to boost food security among small scale farmers. Inoculation of this crop with beneficial soil microbiota can sustainably improve its production especially under water stress conditions. Here, we aimed at determining the effect of bradyrhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) co-inoculation on growth and nitrogen fixation of green grams under water stress conditions. Potted green grams variety KS20 were planted in sterilized soil and inoculated with Bradyrhizobium, Funneliformis mosseae, Rhizophagus irregularis, a commercial consortium of four AMF isolates (Rhizophagus irregularis, Funneliformis mosseae, Glomus etunicatum and Glomus aggregatum) and a consortium of the four aforementioned AMF isolates and Bradyrhizobium. The plants were subjected to three water stress levels, irrigation after interval of 4 days, 8 days and 12 days and maintained for 50 days. After harvesting, the plants were measured for nodulation, percentage root mycorrhizal colonization, growth parameters and shoot nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K). Remarkably, all AMF inoculations significantly P ≤ 0.05 increased shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW) and P compared to Bradyrhizobium and control plants under all the watering regimes. Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis resulted to highest shoot dry weight, root dry weight and P under water regime 3, which provided the most intense water stress condition. Moreover, strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.8765, P = 0.006) was observed between shoot dry weight, P and AMF root colonization under all watering regimes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculations increased shoot and root dry weight compared with Bradyrhizobium and controls across watering regimes.

Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under all the watering regimese0
Comparator
Bradyrhizobium and control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all AMF inoculations significantly P ≤ 0.05 increased shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW) and P compared to Bradyrhizobium and control plants under all the watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“green grams (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF inoculations increased shoot phosphorus compared with Bradyrhizobium and controls across watering regimes.

Treatment
AMF inoculationse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Bradyrhizobium and control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all AMF inoculations significantly P ≤ 0.05 increased shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW) and P compared to Bradyrhizobium and control plants under all the watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“green grams (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizophagus irregularis produced the highest shoot and root dry weight under the most intense water stress.

Treatment
Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularise0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weight, root dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under water regime 3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis resulted to highest shoot dry weight, root dry weight and P under water regime 3, which provided the most intense water stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“green grams (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizophagus irregularis produced the highest phosphorus under the most intense water stress.

Treatment
Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularise0
Interactor
Rhizophagus irregularisRhizophagus irregularise0symbiont
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizophagus irregularis
Rhizophagus irregularis · InteractorMylène Durant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis resulted to highest shoot dry weight, root dry weight and P under water regime 3, which provided the most intense water stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1508 · show in text ↑
t0

“green grams (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot dry weight, phosphorus and AMF root colonization were positively correlated across watering regimes.

Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot dry weight, P and AMF root colonizatione0
Direction
positivee0
Value
R2 = 0.8765e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.8765, P = 0.006) was observed between shoot dry weight, P and AMF root colonization under all watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“green grams (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–134 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 60 positive, 1 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.